Add Claude Code support, credential routing polish, and CYA-WP-0006

Mirror sibling-repo Claude setup (CLAUDE.md + .claude/rules/*), align
AGENTS.md with fleet credential-routing template, and close housekeeping
gaps (WP-0002-T05 done, WP-0005 status note). Draft CYA-WP-0006 for
Profile 1 production hardening as the proposed next slice.

workplans/CYA-WP-0002-memory-integration-roadmap.md

@@ -137,10 +137,11 @@ completed: "2026-05-26"
 
 ```task
 id: CYA-WP-0002-T05
-status: progress
+status: done
 priority: high
 state_hub_task_id: "d30f159c-3459-4c7b-ba31-990a73deaffb"
 started: "2026-05-26 final ralph push"
+completed: "2026-05-28"
 ```
 
 - Expand the test suite (building on T07) with memory-specific tests (in-memory fake phase-memory adapter, profile scenarios, error cases).

workplans/CYA-WP-0005-agentic-memory-profiles-and-phase-memory-feedback.md

@@ -254,7 +254,9 @@ When complete:
 
 ---
 
-**Status note**: This workplan is created in `proposed` state. It captures a focused, high-leverage planning and feedback slice. Implementation of the profiles (beyond the baseline documentation and optional Profile 1 spike) should be activated only after review and operator go-ahead, following the ralph-workplan discipline used for 0001–0004.
+**Status note**: Completed 2026-05-28. Profile 0 baseline, Profiles 1–3 definitions, phase-memory
+feedback artifact, and minimal Profile 1 spike are delivered. Production hardening for Profile 1
+is tracked in `workplans/CYA-WP-0006-profile-1-production-hardening.md`.
 
 **References** (non-exhaustive):
 - Research: `history/2026-05-28-CYA-Agentic-Memory-Research-Variations.md`

workplans/CYA-WP-0006-profile-1-production-hardening.md

@@ -0,0 +1,199 @@
+---
+id: CYA-WP-0006
+type: workplan
+title: "Profile 1 Production Hardening: Reflection UX, Compaction, and Surfacing"
+domain: capabilities
+repo: can-you-assist
+status: proposed
+owner: grok
+topic_slug: foerster-capabilities
+created: "2026-06-19"
+updated: "2026-06-19"
+---
+
+# CYA-WP-0006: Profile 1 Production Hardening
+
+## Goal
+
+Move the **Profile 1** (Reflexion-style verbal reflections) spike from CYA-WP-0005-T05
+from "minimal but working" to **production-quality** behavior that users can rely on daily:
+
+- Clearer capture UX inside `cya retrospect`
+- Lightweight reflection management (review, edit path, basic compaction)
+- Stronger surfacing in normal responses and `--explain-context`
+- Expanded tests and observability
+
+Preserve all Profile 0 / safety invariants: user-controlled inspectable memory, full
+provenance, memory signals add caution only (never downgrade risk or bypass confirmation).
+
+## Background & References
+
+- **Profile 1 spike (done):** `remember_reflection()`, `KIND_REFLECTION`, optional capture
+  step in `run_retrospection()`, preferential recall by kind, basic output surfacing.
+- **Gap analysis:** `history/2026-05-28-CYA-Intent-Scope-Gap-Analysis-Post-0005.md` —
+  recommends production-hardening Profile 1 as the highest-leverage next deepening step.
+- **Profile definitions:** MemoryVision.md — Profile 1 section and Capability Matrix.
+- **Safety contract:** `src/cya/safety/risk.py` + CYA-WP-0002-T04 invariants.
+
+## Non-Goals (for this slice)
+
+- Profile 2 (hierarchical synthesis) or Profile 3 (procedural evolution) implementation.
+- Real `llm-connect` client wiring (separate future slice).
+- Deep `phase-memory` graph/planner integration (feedback doc exists; wiring is later).
+- Automatic background reflection generation without explicit user trigger.
+- PyPI publishing or CI automation (registered debt from CYA-WP-0004).
+
+## Task Breakdown
+
+### T01 — Audit Profile 1 spike gaps vs MemoryVision acceptance
+
+```task
+id: CYA-WP-0006-T01
+status: todo
+priority: high
+```
+
+Document the delta between shipped spike behavior and MemoryVision Profile 1 acceptance
+criteria: capture UX, activation surfacing, compaction, explainability, safety integration.
+Produce a short checklist in the workplan or `docs/` that gates T02–T05.
+
+**Acceptance criteria:**
+- Gap checklist exists with prioritized items mapped to tasks T02–T05.
+- No code changes required unless a blocking bug is found (file separately as ADHOC if so).
+
+### T02 — Improve `cya retrospect` reflection capture UX
+
+```task
+id: CYA-WP-0006-T02
+status: todo
+priority: high
+```
+
+Enhance the optional verbal-lesson step in `run_retrospection()`:
+
+- Guided prompts (what went well / what to remember / what to avoid)
+- Preview before save; allow skip without storing empty records
+- Store structured metadata (session date, scope) in provenance
+
+**Acceptance criteria:**
+- Users can capture 1–3 concise lessons with clear prompts and confirmation.
+- Skipping leaves no orphan/empty reflection records.
+- Existing retrospection kinds and goals flow unchanged.
+
+### T03 — Reflection review and lightweight compaction
+
+```task
+id: CYA-WP-0006-T03
+status: todo
+priority: medium
+```
+
+Add user-visible reflection management without hiding state:
+
+- `export_memory(..., kinds=["reflection"])` surfaced via CLI helper or documented path
+- Simple compaction: detect near-duplicate reflections in the same scope (string similarity
+  or normalized key collision) and offer merge/replace in retrospect or a small subcommand
+- All compaction is explicit — no silent deletion
+
+**Acceptance criteria:**
+- User can list/export reflections for a scope.
+- Duplicate detection works on a small fixture set; merge/replace is opt-in.
+- Compaction never bypasses safety or provenance requirements.
+
+### T04 — Strengthen surfacing in responses and `--explain-context`
+
+```task
+id: CYA-WP-0006-T04
+status: todo
+priority: high
+```
+
+Improve how activated reflections appear in `handle_request()` and context explanation:
+
+- Show count + truncated lesson text in `--explain-context` with provenance
+- Normal responses include a concise "reflections influenced this" line when relevant
+- Cap token/line budget to avoid wall-of-text
+
+**Acceptance criteria:**
+- Roundtrip test: stored reflection → recall → visible in explain output.
+- Output remains readable for 0, 1, and 5+ reflections.
+
+### T05 — Tests, observability, and safety regression coverage
+
+```task
+id: CYA-WP-0006-T05
+status: todo
+priority: high
+```
+
+Expand `tests/test_memory.py` and orchestrator tests for:
+
+- New capture UX paths (prompt/skip/preview)
+- Compaction opt-in behavior
+- Surfacing in explain-context
+- Safety invariant: reflections cannot downgrade destructive-command confirmation
+
+Add basic observability in `export_memory` (reflection counts by scope).
+
+**Acceptance criteria:**
+- `make test` / `python3 -m pytest tests/ -q` passes cleanly.
+- At least one test per new behavior path from T02–T04.
+
+### T06 — Documentation updates
+
+```task
+id: CYA-WP-0006-T06
+status: todo
+priority: medium
+```
+
+Update README.md (retrospect / Profile 1 section), MemoryVision.md status note, and
+SCOPE.md if delivered scope changes materially.
+
+**Acceptance criteria:**
+- README documents the hardened Profile 1 flow with an example session.
+- MemoryVision notes Profile 1 as "production" (not "spike") when T02–T05 complete.
+
+### T07 — Register, sync, and handoff
+
+```task
+id: CYA-WP-0006-T07
+status: todo
+priority: medium
+```
+
+Register workstream in State Hub via `make fix-consistency REPO=can-you-assist`,
+log progress event, set workplan to `ready` after review or `active` when implementation
+starts.
+
+**Acceptance criteria:**
+- `state_hub_workstream_id` and task ids written by fix-consistency.
+- `.custodian-brief.md` regenerated with CYA-WP-0006 visible.
+
+## Dependencies & Cross-Repo Coordination
+
+- **phase-memory:** Optional future compaction planner hooks — not required for this slice.
+  See `docs/phase-memory-optimization-suggestions.md` for long-term asks.
+- **llm-connect:** Not required (reflections are user-authored text in this slice).
+
+## Debt & Future Work (Registered)
+
+- Profile 2 synthesis spikes (user-triggered, dry-run first).
+- Real `llm-connect` adapter implementation slice.
+- CI gate for `make test` + `make check-dist` (from CYA-WP-0004 debt).
+- Profile selection UX (`cya memory profile ...`).
+
+## Success Criteria
+
+When complete:
+
+- Profile 1 is demonstrably production-usable: capture, review, activation, and surfacing
+  are polished and tested.
+- Safety and explainability invariants from Profile 0 remain intact.
+- Users reading README + MemoryVision understand Profile 1 as shipped capability, not a spike.
+
+---
+
+**Status note:** Created `proposed` on 2026-06-19 after CYA-WP-0005 completion and gap
+analysis recommendations. Activate to `ready` after operator review; move to `active` when
+implementation begins (ralph-workplan or direct session).