generated from coulomb/repo-seed
T01 Toolchain — vite + pnpm 9.15 + React 18 + strict TS (ADR-0001).
T02 Folder layout — src/{shared,engine,anchor,source,binder,work,app}/
mirroring the future subsystem split, with path aliases.
T03 Boundary lint — eslint-plugin-boundaries enforcing the dependency
edges from wiki/DependencyMap.md §4; verified by a violating fixture.
T04 Canonical normalization v1 — src/shared/text/normalize.ts with
NORMALIZE_VERSION=1; 10/10 vitest covering ligatures, CRLF, soft
hyphens (including line-break reassembly), mixed whitespace.
T05 PDF fixture corpus — 7 user-supplied German PDFs in fixtures/pdfs/
(gitignored binaries) plus a manifest with verbatim known-good
quotes and page counts, ready for CE-WP-0002 selector tests.
T06 README upgrade — umbrella README points at wiki/docs/workplans
and documents the dev workflow.
T07 ADR-0002..0006 stubs in docs/decisions/.
Toolchain end-to-end: pnpm install + lint + typecheck + test all green.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
3.1 KiB
3.1 KiB
ADR-0001 — Toolchain (Vite + pnpm + React 18 + strict TypeScript)
- Status: accepted
- Date: 2026-05-24
- Workplan: CE-WP-0001-T01
Context
citation-evidence is the umbrella repo for an MVP that will eventually be
segmented into six packages (shared/engine, anchor, source, binder,
work, app per wiki/DependencyMap.md). We need a single toolchain that:
- Gives a fast inner dev loop for a React-based reference workspace.
- Plays well with a future pnpm workspace split (so each
src/<name>/folder can become a workspace package with agit mvand apackage.jsoncut). - Provides first-class TypeScript with the strictest practical settings — the
shared contracts in
wiki/SharedContracts.mdonly pay off if the type system actually enforces them. - Has a credible unit-test story for the engine/anchor/source pure-logic code and an integration path for the UI later.
Options considered
-
Vite + pnpm + React + Vitest (chosen)
- Fast HMR; well-supported React plugin; Vitest shares the Vite pipeline so tests use the same module resolution as the app.
- pnpm workspaces are the most ergonomic path to the eventual multi-package split.
- React 18 because the PRD's reference workspace is a desktop-class web app and the ecosystem (PDF viewer libraries, drag-and-drop, etc.) targets it.
-
Next.js (App Router)
- Heavier than needed for a local-first reference workspace; SSR/route handlers add complexity the MVP doesn't use.
- Harder to split into independent packages later.
-
tsc-only + custom runner
- Simplest, but no HMR and we'd hand-roll the React + bundler integration. Pointless overhead for a UI-centric project.
-
Bun / Deno
- Toolchain bets that would add risk to the PDF/viewer integration spike,
which is already the highest-risk part of the project (see
CE-WP-0002-T02).
- Toolchain bets that would add risk to the PDF/viewer integration spike,
which is already the highest-risk part of the project (see
Decision
Use Vite 5 + pnpm 9 + React 18 + TypeScript 5 with strict,
noUncheckedIndexedAccess, exactOptionalPropertyTypes, noImplicitOverride,
noFallthroughCasesInSwitch, verbatimModuleSyntax turned on. Use
Vitest 2 as the test runner. Node version pinned to 20.10.0 LTS via
.nvmrc. Path aliases (@shared/*, @engine/*, etc.) map to src/<name>/*
so import sites read the same whether or not the folder is later extracted.
Consequences
- Bumping React or Node is a deliberate, ADR-worthy change.
- The eventual pnpm workspace split keeps the same import names — each
package's
namebecomes@citation-evidence/<folder>and the path aliases are replaced by package resolution. No source-code churn required. - Vitest's Vite-aware resolution means a contract test that imports across partitions will fail at the same boundary that production code would — there is no test-only loophole.
- ESLint rules enforcing the dependency map (CE-WP-0001-T03) layer on top
cleanly:
eslint-plugin-boundariesreads the sametsconfigpaths. - No application dependencies are installed in this task — only the toolchain. Subsequent workplans install PDF, drag-and-drop, etc. on demand and record them in their own ADRs where the choice is non-obvious.