Activate WP-0003 and WP-0004. Add tools/effective_config.py (deterministic, order-independent override-path resolver — path only, never a value) and tools/config_explain.py + `make explain` to render the layer path, winning layer, validator, owner, consumers, and secret references for any surface.*. Verified on all 4 seeded surfaces; order-independent; no values/secrets leak. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
5.7 KiB
id, type, title, domain, repo, status, owner, topic_slug, created, updated, state_hub_workstream_id
| id | type | title | domain | repo | status | owner | topic_slug | created | updated | state_hub_workstream_id |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATLAS-WP-0004 | workplan | Effective-config explain and graph | infotech | config-atlas | active | codex | custodian | 2026-06-26 | 2026-06-27 | fbfdbf2b-ca6b-450e-a654-a61c5939f068 |
Effective-config explain and graph
Turn the registry into the read-first control-plane MVP: given a key, show its layer path, what overrides what, its owner, its consumers, and its blast radius — statically, from source links, without reading any live value.
This is Phase 3 of specs/ArchitectureBlueprint.md
§6 and realizes PRD FR-5 and FR-7
(specs/ProductRequirementsDocument.md).
The configuration knowledge graph reuses the State Hub relationship store rather
than building a new graph database (docs/ecosystem-boundaries.md
§2.5; research/configuration-control-plane.md §5).
Depends on: ATLAS-WP-0002 (entries carry sources[].role and relations).
Benefits from, but does not require, ATLAS-WP-0003 (connectors enrich coverage).
Hard boundary: this renders the effective-config path only. Resolving the
actual effective value is out of scope (delegated downstream); feature-flag
surfaces link to feature-control and are never re-resolved here.
Exit condition: config explain <surface-id> emits an ordered override path
with winning layer, what it overrode, validating schema, and owner; config-typed
edges are expressible to the State Hub graph; a blast-radius view lists affected
consumers.
Sequencing: T01 (resolver) → T02 (CLI) and T05 (tests); T03 (graph edges) → T04 (blast-radius). T01 and T03 may start in parallel.
Effective-config path resolver (static)
id: ATLAS-WP-0004-T01
status: done
priority: high
state_hub_task_id: "cee293aa-b407-4b97-a462-b67d7aa0f170"
Result 2026-06-27: Added tools/effective_config.py — a pure, deterministic
resolver that orders a surface's sources[] by canonical L0-L9 layer rank and
emits the override path (contributing layers, winning layer, what each overrode,
validator, owner). Renders the PATH only, never a value; non-layer roles
(feature-control-key) are listed as linked authority. Verified order-independent
(8x shuffle -> identical path).
Implement a static resolver that, from a surface's sources[] (with layer role),
the L0–L9 ordering, and the explicit merge rules, produces the override path:
ordered contributing layers, the winning layer, what each overrode, the validating
schema, and the owner — never a live value. Honors non-overridable guardrails. See
the config explain shape in wiki/ConfigLayering.md.
- Acceptance: given a surface with ordered sources, the resolver returns a deterministic, order-independent override path with owner + validator refs and no resolved value.
config explain tool
id: ATLAS-WP-0004-T02
status: done
priority: high
state_hub_task_id: "5d66a8c1-74bd-4c6f-9ea6-839e884ad103"
Result 2026-06-27: Added tools/config_explain.py and make explain SURFACE=.... Renders the resolver output (layer path, overrides, winning layer,
validator, owner, consumers, secret refs) for any surface.* id. Verified on all
4 seeded surfaces; no values or secret values appear in output. Documented in
.claude/rules/stack-and-commands.md.
Add a tools/ command (e.g. config_explain.py) that takes a surface.* id and
renders the resolver output as the human/agent-readable config explain view.
Reuse the existing tools/ + Makefile pattern (make explain SURFACE=...).
- Acceptance:
config explain surface.infotech.state-hub.api-configprints the ordered layer path, overrides, validator, owner, and consumers.
Config knowledge graph edges to State Hub
id: ATLAS-WP-0004-T03
status: todo
priority: medium
state_hub_task_id: "7b16eaa0-f5e1-4ff3-809d-729b312fd154"
Emit config-typed edges (consumed_by, overrides, depends_on_secret,
related_to) from surface entries to the State Hub relationship/graph model,
contributing the config semantics of each edge while the hub stores topology
(PRD FR-7; ecosystem-boundaries §2.5). Do not build a separate graph store.
- Acceptance: declared edges from the seed surfaces are expressed to the State Hub without duplicating its store; edges are queryable by surface id.
Blast-radius / dependency view
id: ATLAS-WP-0004-T04
status: todo
priority: medium
state_hub_task_id: "57e085c7-25e8-4e2d-bb3e-43b82e351aa9"
Build a view that, for a given surface, traverses the graph to list affected
consumers, dependent surfaces, and referenced secrets — the
config key → service → tenant → feature → secret → owner chain from
research §5. Supports change-risk reasoning before a change.
- Acceptance: for a surface, the view lists downstream consumers and dependent surfaces; a change to a high-fan-out surface is visibly higher risk.
Resolver determinism tests
id: ATLAS-WP-0004-T05
status: todo
priority: medium
state_hub_task_id: "77b19d5f-f55c-48bb-8129-ba1478e47223"
Add tests proving the override path is deterministic and order-independent
(consistent with the merge-rule and CUE-unification rationale,
research §3.3), and that no live or secret value ever appears in explain output.
Wire into the CI gate (make validate).
- Acceptance: tests pass in CI; an explain output containing a literal value or secret fails the test.
After workplan or registry file updates, sync from ~/state-hub:
make fix-consistency REPO=config-atlas