T01 connector_base + docs/discovery-connectors.md (read-only/stateless, candidate->PR->promote; `candidate` added to schema status enum; candidates/ gitignored, excluded from gate). T02 connector_reposcoping (repo-scoping facts -> candidates; graceful degrade). T03 connector_gitconfig (deterministic scan; real .env -> secret-ref, no values; verified 4 real candidates from ~/state-hub). T04 connector_featurecontrol (feature-flag surfaces linking to feature-control keys, no eval logic; FR-12). T05 registry_health (unowned + stale detection). Make targets: connect-gitconfig/reposcoping/featurecontrol, registry-health. WP-0003 finished (5/5). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
6.5 KiB
id, type, title, domain, repo, status, owner, topic_slug, created, updated, state_hub_workstream_id
| id | type | title | domain | repo | status | owner | topic_slug | created | updated | state_hub_workstream_id |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATLAS-WP-0003 | workplan | Discovery connectors | infotech | config-atlas | finished | codex | custodian | 2026-06-26 | 2026-06-27 | e4400d9c-021a-4e44-8e9b-719f94a9561a |
Discovery connectors
Grow the configuration-surface registry from automated discovery instead of
only hand authoring — by reusing repo-scoping's scanner → candidate → approval
machinery rather than building bespoke scanners.
This is Phase 2 of specs/ArchitectureBlueprint.md
§6 and realizes PRD FR-8 (specs/ProductRequirementsDocument.md).
Connectors are read-only and stateless: they emit candidate surface entries
for human/agent PR review and never write any source system or auto-merge
(docs/ecosystem-boundaries.md §2.4).
Depends on: ATLAS-WP-0002 (surface schema, registry layout, CI gate). The
candidate → approval → registry-truth state machine and source-linked evidence
model are reused from repo-scoping, not reinvented.
Exit condition: at least one connector produces candidate surfaces that enter via PR, validate against the schema, and can be promoted to entries; stale/unowned surfaces are reported. No connector mutates a source system.
Sequencing: T01 (contract) first; T02–T04 (connectors) depend on T01 and may proceed in parallel; T05 (stale/unowned) depends on having connector-produced data.
Define the connector contract and candidate workflow
id: ATLAS-WP-0003-T01
status: done
priority: high
state_hub_task_id: "e7b03e49-7e49-4629-ada1-facdf596569b"
Result 2026-06-27: Added tools/connector_base.py (validates + writes candidates,
refuses to overwrite promoted entries, never stores values) and the contract in
docs/discovery-connectors.md (read-only/stateless, candidate->PR->promote,
status: candidate + provenance). Added candidate to the schema status enum;
candidates/ is gitignored and excluded from the gate.
Specify the read-only connector contract and the candidate lifecycle. Define the
candidate entry format (a surface entry with status: candidate + provenance) and
its location (registry/surfaces/candidates/), and the connector → candidate YAML → PR → validate → promote/merge flow. Reuse repo-scoping's
Scope→…→Evidence→Fact provenance and candidate→approval model
(~/repo-scoping/docs/scope-md-spec.md, src/repo_scoping/candidate_graph/).
Document in docs/discovery-connectors.md.
- Acceptance: a documented contract (inputs, candidate output shape, promotion
rules); connectors are specified as stateless and non-mutating; the candidate
schema reuses the surface-entry schema with a
candidatestatus + provenance.
repo-scoping fact ingestion connector
id: ATLAS-WP-0003-T02
status: done
priority: high
state_hub_task_id: "2447547b-1776-4225-af4f-f73680ccb2df"
Result 2026-06-27: Added tools/connector_reposcoping.py (+ make
connect-reposcoping). Consumes repo-scoping facts (--facts file or
REPO_SCOPING_URL), filters config facts, emits schema-valid candidates; degrades
gracefully when the API is down. Verified on synthetic facts (2 config candidates,
non-config skipped).
Build the connector that consumes repo-scoping observed facts/evidence as input
and emits candidate configuration surfaces, adding only the config-kind and layer
classification on top (ecosystem-boundaries §2.4 option a). Map repo-scoping facts
about config files/env/params to surface.* candidates with kind, scope, and
sources[] populated.
- Acceptance: running the connector against a registered repo's repo-scoping facts emits valid candidate surfaces (schema-valid) with source links; zero writes to repo-scoping or the scanned repo.
git-config deterministic scanner
id: ATLAS-WP-0003-T03
status: done
priority: medium
state_hub_task_id: "ddfb8eaf-46b4-4b15-9719-b167538c15fb"
Result 2026-06-27: Added tools/connector_gitconfig.py (+ make connect-gitconfig).
Deterministic scan for .env.example / values.yaml / config*.yaml; real .env ->
secret-ref (no value read). Verified on ~/state-hub: 4 real candidates including a
Helm values.yaml and a secret-ref .env.
Build a deterministic scanner over repository config surfaces — env files, YAML/TOML
config, Kubernetes ConfigMap/Secret references, and Helm values*.yaml overlays —
emitting candidate entries with inferred kind and layer role per source. Secret
references become secret-ref candidates (reference only, never values).
- Acceptance: scanning a sample repo emits candidates classified by kind, with Helm overlays mapped to layer roles; secret references carry no values.
feature-control flag connector
id: ATLAS-WP-0003-T04
status: done
priority: medium
state_hub_task_id: "9e2f5893-7b98-4ca6-89d7-94d093d6bd4b"
Result 2026-06-27: Added tools/connector_featurecontrol.py (+ make
connect-featurecontrol). Emits feature-flag surfaces linking to feature-control
keys (role: feature-control-key, openfeature endpoint) with no eval logic (FR-12);
degrades when no key registry exists. Verified on synthetic keys.
Build a connector that inventories feature-control keys and emits feature-flag
surfaces that link to the feature-control key (sources[].role: feature-control-key) and contain no evaluation logic (PRD FR-12; reinforces the
delegation boundary). Surface stale flags as a signal.
- Acceptance: feature-control keys appear as
feature-flagcandidate surfaces linking to the authoritative key; config-atlas holds no flag-evaluation logic.
Stale and unowned surface detection
id: ATLAS-WP-0003-T05
status: done
priority: medium
state_hub_task_id: "ddcf070c-a863-47df-8c99-61c1980a8d18"
Result 2026-06-27: Added tools/registry_health.py (+ make registry-health).
Reports unowned (missing/unresolvable owner vs reuse-surface roster as domain-tree
stand-in) and stale (evidence.last_seen) surfaces. Verified: 4 promoted surfaces,
all owned and fresh.
Add a report that flags surfaces with no resolvable owner (against domain-tree)
and surfaces whose sources were not seen in the latest scan (stale/drift signal),
using evidence.last_seen. Wire it into the validation tooling (tools/).
- Acceptance: the report lists unowned and stale surfaces; an unowned or unseen-since-N-days surface is surfaced for review.
After workplan or registry file updates, sync from ~/state-hub:
make fix-consistency REPO=config-atlas