Files
flex-auth/examples/topaz/scripts/probe.sh
tegwick 82177d88a9 Topaz alignment spike — mapping doc + green e2e example
Closes FLEX-WP-0005 T04. Validates ADR-003's commitment to shape the
standalone core for cheap Topaz adapter work.

Spike output:
- docs/topaz-mapping-spike.md — vocabulary map (subject, group, tenant,
  knowledge_base, document, plus parent / owner_team / reader / steward /
  member relations), Rego module shape, decision envelope, wire-protocol
  ranking (gRPC primary, REST fallback, embedding rejected), schema
  restatement recommendation, implications for FLEX-WP-0002 / 0004.
- examples/topaz/ — runnable docker-compose deploying Topaz with the
  flex-auth-shaped manifest. seed and probe one-shots cover three
  scenarios: alice (steward) allow, bob (group→reader) allow, eve
  (outsider) deny. End-to-end green on 2026-05-16:

    probe: steward-allow OK (check=true)
    probe: reader-allow  OK (check=true)
    probe: outsider-deny OK (check=false)
    probe: all checks passed

Key findings recorded as Implementation Notes in the spike doc:
- Rego input contract bridging (Topaz raw shape ↔ flex-auth canonical
  shape) is adapter scope, not core scope.
- Topaz identity objects are a Topaz convention; the adapter
  materializes them at directory import time.
- Directory-only permission resolution is sufficient for the common
  case; Rego is reserved for context-dependent decisions.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-16 09:04:42 +02:00

67 lines
2.1 KiB
Bash
Executable File

#!/bin/sh
# Probe the Topaz directory's Check API to verify the seeded manifest
# correctly resolves reader/steward/outsider permissions for the
# Markitect internal-document fixture. Exits 0 if all checks match
# expectations.
#
# This probe deliberately uses the directory Check API rather than the
# authorizer Is API. The manifest permissions are the substrate the
# Topaz adapter (FLEX-WP-0004 T01) and the standalone evaluator both
# consult; demonstrating it works end-to-end here is the spike's actual
# validation question. Bridging flex-auth's Rego input shape into
# Topaz's raw authorizer input is adapter work, intentionally out of
# this spike's scope (see docs/topaz-mapping-spike.md §"Implementation
# Notes").
set -eu
apk add --no-cache curl jq >/dev/null
DIR="${DIRECTORY_REST:-http://topaz:9393}"
echo "probe: directory REST = $DIR"
check() {
name="$1"
subject="$2"
resource="$3"
permission="$4"
expect="$5" # "true" or "false"
body=$(cat <<EOF
{
"object_type": "document",
"object_id": "$resource",
"relation": "$permission",
"subject_type": "user",
"subject_id": "$subject"
}
EOF
)
response=$(curl -sf -X POST "$DIR/api/v3/directory/check" \
-H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
-d "$body")
echo "probe: $name => $response"
got=$(echo "$response" | jq -r '.check')
if [ "$got" = "$expect" ]; then
echo "probe: $name OK (check=$got)"
else
echo "probe: $name FAIL (check=$got; expected=$expect)"
exit 1
fi
}
# Three scenarios on the seeded directory:
# 1. Alice is a steward on the document, so read should be permitted.
# 2. Bob is a member of reader:platform-architecture, which is the
# reader on the document via subject_relation=member, so read should
# be permitted via the reader|group#member union in the manifest.
# 3. Eve has no relation to the document, so read should be denied.
check "steward-allow" "alice@example.test" "document:internal-note" "read" "true"
check "reader-allow" "bob@example.test" "document:internal-note" "read" "true"
check "outsider-deny" "eve@example.test" "document:internal-note" "read" "false"
echo "probe: all checks passed"