generated from coulomb/repo-seed
feat(registry): scaffold HR workflow registry with assessment loop
Add workflow entries for INTENT assessment and automation-roadmap phases, workflows.yaml index, assessment-loop stages, and capability.hr.workflow-catalog for reuse-surface federation. Completes HUMAN-WP-0002.
This commit is contained in:
111
registry/workflows/workflow.hr.automation-roadmap.md
Normal file
111
registry/workflows/workflow.hr.automation-roadmap.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,111 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
id: workflow.hr.automation-roadmap
|
||||
name: HR Automation Roadmap
|
||||
summary: Prioritize high-impact repetitive HR tasks for intelligent automation while preserving human-led strategic and relational work.
|
||||
owner: human-resources
|
||||
status: draft
|
||||
domain: consumer
|
||||
intent_phase: automation-roadmap
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- automation
|
||||
- roadmap
|
||||
- prioritization
|
||||
- planning
|
||||
|
||||
assessment:
|
||||
stage: inventory
|
||||
last_reviewed: "2026-06-24"
|
||||
blockers:
|
||||
- Depends on workflow.hr.current-state-assessment reaching automation_potential stage
|
||||
notes:
|
||||
- Initial scaffold entry; candidate list seeded from INTENT automation guidance.
|
||||
|
||||
lifecycle:
|
||||
depends_on:
|
||||
- workflow.hr.current-state-assessment
|
||||
precedes: []
|
||||
supports: []
|
||||
|
||||
scope:
|
||||
includes:
|
||||
- prioritizing automation candidates by impact, effort, and risk
|
||||
- defining human-in-the-loop boundaries per candidate
|
||||
- sequencing rollout (start small, expand with feedback)
|
||||
excludes:
|
||||
- building or deploying HRIS/payroll products
|
||||
- replacing coaching, complex dispute resolution, or culture-building
|
||||
|
||||
actors:
|
||||
- HR operators and people-ops leads
|
||||
- engineering/automation agents (future implementation)
|
||||
- custodian agents (workplan and registry coordination)
|
||||
|
||||
inputs:
|
||||
- current-state assessment outputs (process maps, pain points)
|
||||
- INTENT automation best practices (high-impact repetitive tasks first)
|
||||
- compliance and data-security constraints
|
||||
|
||||
outputs:
|
||||
- ranked automation backlog with rationale
|
||||
- per-candidate human-touch boundaries
|
||||
- phased rollout plan with feedback/ROI review hooks
|
||||
|
||||
metrics_hooks:
|
||||
- manual-touch reduction target per candidate (TBD)
|
||||
- cycle-time reduction target per candidate (TBD)
|
||||
- employee self-service adoption (TBD)
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# HR Automation Roadmap
|
||||
|
||||
## Overview
|
||||
|
||||
Second INTENT phase: turn assessment findings into a sequenced automation plan.
|
||||
Automation amplifies efficiency; strategic and relational HR work stays
|
||||
human-led per INTENT.
|
||||
|
||||
## Candidate seed list
|
||||
|
||||
From INTENT automation guidance—validate against current-state inventory:
|
||||
|
||||
| Candidate | Typical impact | Human touch retained |
|
||||
|-----------|----------------|----------------------|
|
||||
| Onboarding paperwork & checklist routing | High volume, repetitive | Culture immersion, manager intro |
|
||||
| Leave and absence requests | Self-service friendly | Complex cases, accommodations |
|
||||
| Benefits enrollment reminders | Seasonal, rule-based | Plan design, exceptions |
|
||||
| Compliance tracking & audit prep | Error reduction | Investigations, judgment calls |
|
||||
| Basic HR reporting | Time savings | Interpretation, strategy |
|
||||
| Payroll-adjacent data validation | Accuracy | Compensation design (out of scope for product build) |
|
||||
|
||||
## Prioritization rubric
|
||||
|
||||
Score each candidate (1–5) on:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Volume** — how often the task runs
|
||||
2. **Repetition** — rule-bound vs judgment-heavy
|
||||
3. **Pain** — current friction from assessment
|
||||
4. **Risk** — compliance/privacy exposure if automated poorly
|
||||
5. **Readiness** — data, tools, and policy clarity available
|
||||
|
||||
Prefer high `(volume + repetition + pain) / risk` with readiness ≥ 3.
|
||||
|
||||
## Assessment loop position
|
||||
|
||||
Blocked at **`inventory`** until current-state assessment advances to
|
||||
`automation_potential`. See `registry/assessment-loop.md`.
|
||||
|
||||
### Next steps
|
||||
|
||||
1. Import validated candidates from current-state assessment.
|
||||
2. Apply prioritization rubric; produce ranked backlog.
|
||||
3. Define phase-1 pilot (single candidate, clear ROI metric).
|
||||
4. Advance to `automation_potential` when backlog is ranked and bounded.
|
||||
|
||||
## INTENT linkage
|
||||
|
||||
> *"…current-state assessment, **automation roadmap**, metrics framework,
|
||||
> specific workflows…"* — `INTENT.md`
|
||||
|
||||
> *"Automation excels at admin (payroll, benefits enrollment, compliance
|
||||
> tracking, basic reporting) but strategic/relational elements remain
|
||||
> human-led."* — `INTENT.md` background
|
||||
97
registry/workflows/workflow.hr.current-state-assessment.md
Normal file
97
registry/workflows/workflow.hr.current-state-assessment.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,97 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
id: workflow.hr.current-state-assessment
|
||||
name: Current-State HR Assessment
|
||||
summary: Inventory HR functions, processes, tools, and pain points to establish a factual baseline before automation or redesign.
|
||||
owner: human-resources
|
||||
status: draft
|
||||
domain: consumer
|
||||
intent_phase: assessment
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- assessment
|
||||
- current-state
|
||||
- inventory
|
||||
- planning
|
||||
|
||||
assessment:
|
||||
stage: inventory
|
||||
last_reviewed: "2026-06-24"
|
||||
blockers: []
|
||||
notes:
|
||||
- Initial scaffold entry; function inventory seeded from INTENT background.
|
||||
|
||||
lifecycle:
|
||||
precedes:
|
||||
- workflow.hr.automation-roadmap
|
||||
supports: []
|
||||
|
||||
scope:
|
||||
includes:
|
||||
- mapping HR functions to current processes and tooling
|
||||
- identifying manual vs semi-automated vs automated steps
|
||||
- surfacing compliance, data, and people-risks in the baseline
|
||||
excludes:
|
||||
- payroll/HRIS product selection or implementation
|
||||
- legal contract generation
|
||||
- production workflow automation
|
||||
|
||||
actors:
|
||||
- HR operators and people-ops leads
|
||||
- hiring managers and team leads (input)
|
||||
- custodian agents (registry and workplan maintenance)
|
||||
|
||||
inputs:
|
||||
- INTENT.md HR function list and best-practice notes
|
||||
- existing policies-in-draft and operational runbooks (as discovered)
|
||||
- tool inventory (HRIS, ticketing, docs, spreadsheets)
|
||||
|
||||
outputs:
|
||||
- function-level process maps with automation-readiness signals
|
||||
- gap list (data, policy, tooling, training)
|
||||
- prioritized pain points for roadmap intake
|
||||
|
||||
metrics_hooks:
|
||||
- time-to-complete per function area (baseline TBD)
|
||||
- manual-touch count per process (baseline TBD)
|
||||
- policy/process consistency score (baseline TBD)
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Current-State HR Assessment
|
||||
|
||||
## Overview
|
||||
|
||||
First INTENT phase: establish what HR does today, how, and with what friction.
|
||||
This workflow is meta-planning—it produces the evidence base for every
|
||||
operational HR workflow entry added later.
|
||||
|
||||
## HR function inventory
|
||||
|
||||
Seed list from INTENT background (expand per assessment cycle):
|
||||
|
||||
| Function area | Assessment focus |
|
||||
|---------------|------------------|
|
||||
| Talent acquisition & recruitment | Sourcing, screening, interview loop, time-to-hire |
|
||||
| Onboarding & integration | Paperwork, training, culture immersion, tool access |
|
||||
| Compensation & benefits | Pay bands, enrollment, fairness checks |
|
||||
| Performance management | Goals, feedback cadence, review cycles |
|
||||
| Learning & development | Training catalog, upskilling, succession |
|
||||
| Engagement, relations & culture | Recognition, conflict, wellness, inclusion |
|
||||
| Compliance, risk & legal | Labor law, privacy, audits, investigations |
|
||||
| Workforce planning & analytics | Forecasting, turnover, engagement metrics |
|
||||
| Offboarding & retention | Exit process, knowledge transfer, alumni |
|
||||
|
||||
## Assessment loop position
|
||||
|
||||
Currently at **`inventory`**. See `registry/assessment-loop.md` for stage
|
||||
definitions and exit criteria.
|
||||
|
||||
### Next steps
|
||||
|
||||
1. For each function area, document actors, triggers, and current artifacts.
|
||||
2. Mark steps as manual, semi-automated, or automated.
|
||||
3. Advance to `automation_potential` when all areas have a first-pass inventory.
|
||||
|
||||
## INTENT linkage
|
||||
|
||||
> *"We can now iterate toward optimal human performance by breaking it into
|
||||
> phases (e.g., **current-state assessment**, automation roadmap, metrics
|
||||
> framework, specific workflows)…"* — `INTENT.md`
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user