generated from coulomb/repo-seed
Deepen beneficial ownership and registry identifier research; resolve canon questions
Add source notes on FinCEN CDD/BOI beneficial ownership and ISO 6523/ALEI registry identifier subtypes. Resolve OpenQuestions: Beneficial Ownership Relationship as dedicated type; Registry Identifier and Proxy Commercial Identifier as Reference layer specializations. Update glossary, conceptual model, terminology, downstream recommendations, and corpus index.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -178,13 +178,26 @@ downstream-only.
|
||||
|
||||
### Beneficial Owner modeling
|
||||
|
||||
**Status:** Open.
|
||||
**Status:** Resolved — **Beneficial Ownership Relationship** as dedicated type.
|
||||
|
||||
KYC sources require natural persons behind legal entity customers. Candidate:
|
||||
Beneficial Owner as Natural Person + Ownership/Representation with Evidence.
|
||||
**Decision:** Model regulated beneficial ownership as **Beneficial Ownership
|
||||
Relationship** from **Natural Person** to **Organization** / **Legal Entity**
|
||||
customer. Use `ownership_prong`, `control_prong`, `equity_percentage`,
|
||||
`control_basis`, and `intermediary_chain` metadata. Keep **Beneficial Owner** as
|
||||
a glossary role label for the person, not a participation root.
|
||||
|
||||
**Decision needed:** Dedicated relationship type vs. Ownership subtype with
|
||||
`beneficial` role metadata.
|
||||
**Rationale:** Distinct from corporate parent Ownership (LEI Level 2), operational
|
||||
resource ownership (Cerbos), and Representation (authorized signers). FinCEN CDD
|
||||
uses dual prongs with trust look-through; collapsing into Ownership subtype would
|
||||
collide with authorization and corporate-structure semantics.
|
||||
|
||||
**Citations:**
|
||||
|
||||
- `research/commercial-identity/beneficial-ownership-kyc-boi.md`
|
||||
- `research/commercial-identity/kyc-aml-commercial-identity-binding.md`
|
||||
|
||||
**Remaining nuance:** Standard `control_basis` enum across jurisdictions; BOI
|
||||
reporting volatility vs. enduring CDD collection obligations.
|
||||
|
||||
### Reputation as canon concept
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -196,11 +209,23 @@ with temporal scope.
|
||||
|
||||
### Registry identifier subtype
|
||||
|
||||
**Status:** Open.
|
||||
**Status:** Resolved — **Registry Identifier** subtype with authority classes.
|
||||
|
||||
LEI, DUNS, UEI, and company registration numbers share renewal, authority, and
|
||||
cross-registry linking needs. Candidate: authoritative **Registry Identifier**
|
||||
subtype with renewal Lifecycle State.
|
||||
**Decision:** Add **Registry Identifier** as an Identifier specialization in the
|
||||
Reference layer. Encode scheme via ISO/IEC 6523 ICD where applicable. Use
|
||||
`authority_class` (`government_registry`, `regulatory_global`, `commercial_proxy`,
|
||||
`tax`), `renewal_required`, and `lifecycle_state` (esp. LEI annual renewal).
|
||||
Add **Proxy Commercial Identifier** for vendor-operated keys (DUNS, ICD 0060).
|
||||
Link multiple registry IDs for one entity via **Synonymity Assertion**.
|
||||
|
||||
**Citations:**
|
||||
|
||||
- `research/commercial-identity/registry-identifier-subtypes.md`
|
||||
- `research/commercial-identity/lei-gleif-legal-entity-identifier.md`
|
||||
- `research/commercial-identity/duns-commercial-credit-identity.md`
|
||||
|
||||
**Remaining nuance:** Synonymity strength bands for LEI ↔ DUNS crosswalks; branch
|
||||
OPI modeling under ISO 6523.
|
||||
|
||||
### Payment credential boundary
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user