generated from coulomb/repo-seed
Seeded repo with initial and secondary research
This commit is contained in:
35
OpenQuestions.md
Normal file
35
OpenQuestions.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
|
||||
# Open Questions
|
||||
|
||||
Status: draft. These questions are intentionally non-secret and
|
||||
implementation-neutral.
|
||||
|
||||
## Canon Questions
|
||||
|
||||
- Should Realm stay a Scope specialization, or does it need its own canonical
|
||||
concept because of issuer and federation semantics?
|
||||
- Should Customer Account become a canonical concept, or should customer
|
||||
account records remain downstream commercial modeling?
|
||||
- Should Team be modeled as a Group, Organization Unit, Community, or a
|
||||
separate specialization?
|
||||
- Should Legal Entity be a specialization of Organization or a relationship
|
||||
between an Organization and a legal system?
|
||||
- What fields are mandatory for every Relationship versus only for sensitive
|
||||
relationships such as delegation, representation, and synonymity?
|
||||
|
||||
## Synonymity Questions
|
||||
|
||||
- Which confidence vocabulary should be used for weak matches?
|
||||
- What is the minimum evidence model for strong account links?
|
||||
- How should revocation or expiry of a synonymity assertion affect downstream
|
||||
caches?
|
||||
- How should privacy-limited links be represented so accidental broadening is
|
||||
visible during review?
|
||||
|
||||
## Corpus Questions
|
||||
|
||||
- Which source notes should be backfilled first: SCIM and LDAP for record
|
||||
semantics, OIDC and SAML for subject semantics, or OpenFGA and Cedar for
|
||||
authorization projections?
|
||||
- How much product-specific detail belongs in source notes versus downstream
|
||||
recommendations?
|
||||
- What citation format should the repo use once source notes are populated?
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user