generated from coulomb/repo-seed
Resolve payment credential and CRM pipeline commitment boundaries
Add research on PCI/tokenized payment references vs login Credentials (Payment Instrument Reference, Payment Mandate) and CRM Opportunity promotion thresholds (Pipeline Pursuit, binding_trigger). Resolve OpenQuestions for both topics. Update glossary, conceptual model, terminology, and downstream recommendations.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -167,14 +167,18 @@ evidenced obligations that raise counterparty reliance and make identity less fl
|
||||
|
||||
### Commercial Commitment placement
|
||||
|
||||
**Status:** Tentatively resolved — first-class Relationship-layer concept.
|
||||
**Status:** Resolved — first-class concept with explicit promotion thresholds.
|
||||
|
||||
Contracts, subscriptions, payment mandates, and regulated onboarding acceptance
|
||||
map to **Commercial Commitment** attached to Commercial Relationship or
|
||||
Commercial Record. See `commercial-identity-synthesis.md`.
|
||||
Contracts, subscriptions, payment mandates, purchase orders, and regulated
|
||||
onboarding map to **Commercial Commitment**. CRM **Opportunity** maps to
|
||||
**Pipeline Pursuit** — not commitment until `binding_trigger` (signed LOI/quote,
|
||||
executed PO/contract, active subscription). Salesforce Forecast "Commit" is
|
||||
pipeline metadata only.
|
||||
|
||||
**Remaining:** Whether pipeline stages (CRM Opportunity) are commitments or
|
||||
downstream-only.
|
||||
**Citations:**
|
||||
|
||||
- `research/commercial-identity/crm-pipeline-commitment-threshold.md`
|
||||
- `research/commercial-identity/commercial-identity-synthesis.md`
|
||||
|
||||
### Beneficial Owner modeling
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -245,10 +249,18 @@ OPI modeling under ISO 6523.
|
||||
|
||||
### Payment credential boundary
|
||||
|
||||
**Status:** Open (downstream-heavy).
|
||||
**Status:** Resolved — Payment Instrument Reference + Payment Mandate; not Credential.
|
||||
|
||||
Whether payment methods on Commercial Record map to Credential in canon or remain
|
||||
PCI-scoped downstream artifacts only.
|
||||
**Decision:** Do not map payment methods to **Credential**. CHD (PAN, CVV) is
|
||||
out of canon (PCI downstream). Tokenized provider references (`pm_xxx`) map to
|
||||
**Payment Instrument Reference** on **Commercial Record**. Customer authorization
|
||||
to charge maps to **Payment Mandate** (**Commercial Commitment**,
|
||||
`commitment_type: payment_mandate`). Login credentials remain separate.
|
||||
|
||||
**Citations:**
|
||||
|
||||
- `research/commercial-identity/payment-credential-pci-boundary.md`
|
||||
- `research/commercial-subscription/stripe-customer-billing.md`
|
||||
|
||||
## New Questions From Corpus Review
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user