generated from coulomb/repo-seed
Register infospace service workplans
This commit is contained in:
81
workplans/ITC-WP-0010-caring-kubernetes-rbac-benchmark.md
Normal file
81
workplans/ITC-WP-0010-caring-kubernetes-rbac-benchmark.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
id: ITC-WP-0010
|
||||
type: workplan
|
||||
title: "CARING Kubernetes RBAC Benchmark"
|
||||
repo: info-tech-canon
|
||||
status: planned
|
||||
priority: medium
|
||||
created: "2026-05-23"
|
||||
updated: "2026-05-23"
|
||||
depends_on_workplans:
|
||||
- ITC-WP-0003
|
||||
- ITC-WP-0005
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# ITC-WP-0010 - CARING Kubernetes RBAC Benchmark
|
||||
|
||||
## Goal
|
||||
|
||||
Create a distinct benchmark workplan for analyzing Kubernetes RBAC through
|
||||
CARING and the wider InfoTechCanon kernel.
|
||||
|
||||
## Intent
|
||||
|
||||
This is deliberately separate from the small SaaS proof. The benchmark is more
|
||||
ambitious and should stress orthogonality across Access Control, Organization,
|
||||
Governance, Security, Network, DevSecOps, Observability, Task, and Tagging.
|
||||
|
||||
## Tasks
|
||||
|
||||
### T01 - Benchmark workspace
|
||||
|
||||
```task
|
||||
id: ITC-WP-0010-T01
|
||||
status: planned
|
||||
priority: high
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
- Create `infospace/standards/caring/benchmarks/kubernetes-rbac/`.
|
||||
- Define source corpus, cases, expected outputs, and review criteria.
|
||||
|
||||
### T02 - RBAC assimilation
|
||||
|
||||
```task
|
||||
id: ITC-WP-0010-T02
|
||||
status: planned
|
||||
priority: high
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
- Map Kubernetes Role, ClusterRole, RoleBinding, ClusterRoleBinding,
|
||||
ServiceAccount, Namespace, verbs, resources, and scopes.
|
||||
- Preserve the warning that Namespace is not automatically a tenant boundary.
|
||||
|
||||
### T03 - CARING access descriptors
|
||||
|
||||
```task
|
||||
id: ITC-WP-0010-T03
|
||||
status: planned
|
||||
priority: high
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
- Express benchmark cases as CARING access descriptors.
|
||||
- Distinguish declared access, effective access, derived capability, and
|
||||
induced access.
|
||||
|
||||
### T04 - Findings and canon pressure
|
||||
|
||||
```task
|
||||
id: ITC-WP-0010-T04
|
||||
status: planned
|
||||
priority: medium
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
- Produce gaps, conflicts, mappings, and proposed canon changes.
|
||||
- Feed stable findings back into models and standards through explicit tasks.
|
||||
|
||||
## Acceptance
|
||||
|
||||
- Kubernetes RBAC is analyzed as a benchmark, not as a shortcut profile.
|
||||
- CARING descriptor shape is tested with practical examples.
|
||||
- Benchmark findings produce explicit canon change proposals.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user