Add repo-scoping comparison assets

This commit is contained in:
2026-05-23 06:07:18 +02:00
parent 03c9aaf3d1
commit 8f4008ec8f
32 changed files with 1530 additions and 74 deletions

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,61 @@
---
id: comparison/repo-scoping/consumer-workplan-brief
title: Repo Scoping Consumer Workplan Brief
status: candidate
consumer: repo-scoping
comparison_report: comparison/repo-scoping/report
---
# Repo Scoping Consumer Workplan Brief
## Purpose
Use this brief as the seed for a repo-scoping workplan. The adoption and
implementation workplan belongs in the repo-scoping repository, not in
InfoTechCanon.
## Goal
Compare repo-scoping with InfoTechCanon and adopt the canon where it improves
repository intent, current scope, purposes, governance decisions, evidence, and
scope evolution.
## Canon Inputs
- `infospace/evaluations/repo-scoping/comparison-report.md`
- `infospace/evaluations/repo-scoping/comparison-frame.yaml`
- `infospace/evaluations/repo-scoping/canon-benefit-analysis.yaml`
- `infospace/evaluations/repo-scoping/extension-candidates.yaml`
- `infospace/agent/templates/canon-interface-card.template.yaml`
- `infospace/models/governance/InfoTechCanonPurposeDemandExtension.md`
- `infospace/patterns/intent-scope-purposes.md`
## Workplan Tasks For Repo-Scoping
1. Complete a Canon Interface Card for repo-scoping.
2. Map Scope, Ability, Capability, Feature, Evidence, ObservedFact,
ReviewDecision, ExpectationGap, and DependencyImpactAnalysis to canon
concepts or extension candidates.
3. Separate design-time INTENT.md semantics from generated or curated SCOPE.md
semantics.
4. Identify consumer purposes for humans, agents, State Hub, managed repos, and
capability catalog consumers.
5. Evaluate extension candidates and mark which are proven, rejected, deferred,
or repo-scoping-specific.
6. Create repo-scoping tasks for schema, API, UI, and documentation changes.
## Expected Outputs
- completed interface card,
- mapping table from repo-scoping concepts to canon concepts,
- list of accepted canon concepts,
- list of extension candidates with evidence,
- list of repo-scoping implementation tasks,
- list of canon EvolutionRequests.
## Non-Goals
- Do not modify InfoTechCanon standards from the repo-scoping workplan without a
canon-side EvolutionRequest.
- Do not collapse intent, current scope, and consumer purposes into one field.
- Do not treat generated candidates as approved truth without governance review.