ITC-WP-0012: integrate Repository Layout Standard

Register the InfoTechCanon Repository Layout Standard as a domain standard
(itc-repo-layout), processed from demand through the canon's Purpose/Demand
intake without collapsing existing model concepts.

- Register standard in artifacts/index.yaml, canon.yaml, infospace.yaml;
  regenerate indexes, views, briefs, tree, and validation (validate green).
- T04: add reconciliation.yaml (partial/as-is dogfooding, declared core
  conformance, recorded tensions); resolve the demand by moving it out of
  demand/ to the evaluation pack as source-demand.md and removing demand/.
- T05: add consumer-adoption-brief.md for downstream repos.
- Update test artifact/standard counts (60->61, standards 2->3).
- Mark T03/T04/T05 done; workplan and registry status -> finished.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
2026-06-13 14:25:54 +02:00
parent 0ce66ef784
commit f7ad73d9da
28 changed files with 1145 additions and 85 deletions

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,166 @@
---
id: ITC-WP-0012
type: workplan
title: "Canonical Repository Layout Standard Integration"
domain: canon
repo: info-tech-canon
status: finished
priority: medium
created: "2026-06-08"
updated: "2026-06-13"
depends_on_workplans:
- ITC-WP-0005
- ITC-WP-0006
state_hub_workstream_id: "f40ecb8b-7d81-46e6-a420-f7843f708175"
---
# ITC-WP-0012 - Canonical Repository Layout Standard Integration
## Goal
Take the raw demand in `demand/CanonicalRepositoryLayout.md` through the canon's
own Purpose/Demand intake and integrate it into the canon's line of provided
structures (kernel / models / standards / profiles / patterns) **without**
silently editing existing models or collapsing concepts.
## Intent
`demand/CanonicalRepositoryLayout.md` proposes a canonical, retrieval-oriented
documentation layout for repositories — `INTENT.md` / `SCOPE.md` plus
`research/`, `demand/`, `spec/`, `workplans/`, `docs/`, `wiki/`, `issues/`,
`history/` — distilled from CoulombSocial, HelixForge, and MarkiTect experience.
It is explicitly a *recommendation, not a strict requirement*.
The document arrived in `demand/`, which it itself defines as un-reviewed inbound.
It must therefore be processed as a `DemandSignal` under the Purpose And Demand
Model Extension (ITC-WP-0006) before any canon artifact is written. The layout is
a **named cross-cutting convention**, so the working hypothesis is that it lands
as a new **standard** whose per-directory semantics *reference* existing models
(Information Space, Governance + PURPOSES, Task) rather than redefining them. The
placement decision is an explicit review gate (T02), not a foregone conclusion.
This work follows the WP-0009 discipline: produce a comparison, explicit
placement/extension candidates, and reviewable deliverables — never blend the new
convention into existing standards by hand.
## Tasks
### T01 - Demand intake
```task
id: ITC-WP-0012-T01
status: done
priority: high
state_hub_task_id: "9ea93c0f-e69b-4ab5-81c4-75d43a4273cf"
```
- Record `demand/CanonicalRepositoryLayout.md` as a `DemandSignal` using the
Purpose And Demand Model Extension (`ConsumerPurpose`, `DemandSignal`,
`PurposeFit`, `ScopePressure`).
- Capture provenance: prior art is the CoulombSocial / HelixForge / MarkiTect
documentation practice named in the source.
- Assess fit against current SCOPE.md and flag the scope pressure (this proposes
a producer-facing convention the canon does not yet own).
- Do not author any standard/model artifact in this task — intake only.
### T02 - Placement decision (review gate)
```task
id: ITC-WP-0012-T02
status: done
priority: high
state_hub_task_id: "55232b4f-f286-410e-9795-99c8a2cdf25b"
```
- Decide where the convention belongs in the canon line of structures.
Recommendation: a new **standard** (sibling to `tagging/` and `caring/`), not a
model, profile, or pattern, because it is a named cross-cutting convention.
- Map each layout element to existing canon ownership so nothing is re-defined:
- `INTENT.md` / `SCOPE.md` and the SCOPE→INTENT gap-closing loop → Governance +
Purpose/Demand extension.
- `demand/``DemandSignal` intake surface (Purpose/Demand extension).
- `research/`, `docs/`, `wiki/` → Information Space Model (knowledge packaging,
retrieval, links, briefs).
- `spec/` (PRD / TechSpec / UseCaseCatalog / ArchitectureBlueprint) →
Governance + Information Space.
- `workplans/` and `history/` (finished/canceled move to history) → Task Model
+ State Hub workplan conventions.
- `issues/` → mirror of an external ticket system; map to Task Model surface.
- Output explicit placement + extension candidates for review (mirroring
WP-0009), not silent edits.
### T03 - Author the standard artifact
```task
id: ITC-WP-0012-T03
status: done
priority: high
state_hub_task_id: "b9e30be4-c567-4a15-a8ee-8d2898dee9a5"
```
- Author `infospace/standards/repository-layout/InfoTechCanonRepositoryLayoutStandard.md`
(namespace e.g. `itc-repo-layout`) defining the canonical directory set, the
`yymmdd-` prefix conventions (research/, history/), and the SCOPE→INTENT
operating mode.
- Reference — do not duplicate — concepts owned by Information Space, Governance,
Purpose/Demand, and Task models. Honor the no-collapse guardrails.
- Encode conformance as a **recommendation** (the source is explicit it is not a
strict requirement): define conformance levels so adopting repos can be
partial-conformant.
- Register the artifact: add to `canon.yaml`, `infospace/infospace.yaml`
disciplines, the artifact index, and retrieval generation; add structural
validation for the new standard's directories/relationships.
### T04 - Reconcile and regenerate
```task
id: ITC-WP-0012-T04
status: done
priority: medium
state_hub_task_id: "8a89122f-737d-4348-83a8-909b251fa1ae"
```
- Reconcile the standard against this repo's *own* layout and note tensions: the
canon already uses `spec/`, `wiki/`, `workplans/`, `seeds/`; the infospace uses
the kernel/models/standards layout (a distinct concern from doc layout). Record
whether the canon repo will dogfood the convention (e.g. `research/` for the
yawex prior art, moving finished workplans to `history/`).
- Run `make validate`, `make index`, `make tree`, `make agent-briefs`; commit the
regenerated indexes, briefs, tree, and `infospace/validation/latest.json`.
- Move `demand/CanonicalRepositoryLayout.md` to its resolved state once captured
(per the convention, reviewed demand leaves the raw inbound directory).
### T05 - Consumer adoption brief
```task
id: ITC-WP-0012-T05
status: done
priority: low
state_hub_task_id: "7313abf2-e9d3-40d9-8d27-0279d8f4b36c"
```
- Produce a short adoption brief so the seven tracked domains can opt into the
layout from their own repos. Keep per-repo adoption work in those repos, not
here (same boundary as WP-0009).
## Acceptance
- The demand is recorded as a reviewed `DemandSignal` with explicit purpose fit
and scope pressure.
- The placement decision and extension candidates are explicit and reviewed
before any standard text is written.
- A registered `repository-layout` standard exists, references (does not
duplicate) existing model concepts, and encodes recommendation-level
conformance.
- `make validate` is green; indexes, briefs, tree, and validation output are
regenerated.
- `demand/CanonicalRepositoryLayout.md` no longer sits unreviewed in `demand/`.
## Implementation Notes
- Source demand: `demand/CanonicalRepositoryLayout.md` (recommendation, not a
strict requirement; prior art = CoulombSocial / HelixForge / MarkiTect).
- Follows the WP-0009 pattern: compare, surface candidates, keep consumer
adoption in consumer repos.
- `state_hub_workstream_id` and per-task `state_hub_task_id` are filled in on
registration with the State Hub.

View File

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ repository: info-tech-canon
type: workplan-registry
status: active
created: "2026-05-23"
updated: "2026-05-23"
updated: "2026-06-08"
implementation_decisions:
infospace_root: infospace/
@@ -165,3 +165,17 @@ workplans:
- model and standard selection guide
- consumer workplan templates
- CLI JSON API review-kit surface
- id: ITC-WP-0012
title: Canonical Repository Layout Standard Integration
status: finished
priority: medium
path: workplans/ITC-WP-0012-canonical-repository-layout-standard.md
depends_on:
- ITC-WP-0005
- ITC-WP-0006
produces:
- reviewed repository-layout demand signal
- repository-layout standard placement and extension candidates
- registered repository-layout standard
- consumer adoption brief