Add CARING Kubernetes RBAC benchmark

infospace/views/by-mapping-target.md

@@ -2,6 +2,13 @@
 
 # By Mapping Target
 
+## `benchmark/caring/kubernetes-rbac`
+
+- `benchmark/caring/kubernetes-rbac/access-descriptors` via `part_of`
+- `benchmark/caring/kubernetes-rbac/caring-mapping` via `part_of`
+- `benchmark/caring/kubernetes-rbac/findings` via `part_of`
+- `benchmark/caring/kubernetes-rbac/native-concepts` via `part_of`
+
 ## `comparison/repo-scoping/report`
 
 - `comparison/repo-scoping/canon-benefit-analysis` via `part_of`
@@ -57,6 +64,10 @@
 
 ## `model/access-control`
 
+- `benchmark/caring/kubernetes-rbac` via `stress_tests`
+- `benchmark/caring/kubernetes-rbac/access-descriptors` via `uses`
+- `benchmark/caring/kubernetes-rbac/caring-mapping` via `maps`
+- `benchmark/caring/kubernetes-rbac/native-concepts` via `maps`
 - `evaluation/user-engine` via `uses`
 - `evaluation/user-engine/questions` via `uses`
 - `evaluation/user-engine/small-saas-alignment` via `uses`
@@ -80,6 +91,8 @@
 
 ## `model/devsecops`
 
+- `benchmark/caring/kubernetes-rbac` via `stress_tests`
+- `benchmark/caring/kubernetes-rbac/access-descriptors` via `uses`
 - `conformance/railiance-fabric` via `uses`
 - `conformance/railiance-fabric/entity-edge-capture-criteria` via `uses`
 - `conformance/railiance-fabric/mapping-expectations` via `maps`
@@ -90,6 +103,9 @@
 
 ## `model/governance`
 
+- `benchmark/caring/kubernetes-rbac` via `stress_tests`
+- `benchmark/caring/kubernetes-rbac/caring-mapping` via `maps`
+- `benchmark/caring/kubernetes-rbac/findings` via `proposes`
 - `comparison/repo-scoping/canon-benefit-analysis` via `maps`
 - `comparison/repo-scoping/extension-candidates` via `proposes`
 - `comparison/repo-scoping/frame` via `uses`
@@ -121,6 +137,7 @@
 
 ## `model/landscape`
 
+- `benchmark/caring/kubernetes-rbac/native-concepts` via `maps`
 - `conformance/railiance-fabric` via `uses`
 - `conformance/railiance-fabric/entity-edge-capture-criteria` via `uses`
 - `conformance/railiance-fabric/mapping-expectations` via `maps`
@@ -131,6 +148,7 @@
 
 ## `model/network`
 
+- `benchmark/caring/kubernetes-rbac` via `stress_tests`
 - `conformance/railiance-fabric` via `uses`
 - `conformance/railiance-fabric/entity-edge-capture-criteria` via `uses`
 - `conformance/railiance-fabric/mapping-expectations` via `maps`
@@ -141,6 +159,7 @@
 
 ## `model/observability`
 
+- `benchmark/caring/kubernetes-rbac` via `stress_tests`
 - `conformance/railiance-fabric` via `uses`
 - `conformance/railiance-fabric/entity-edge-capture-criteria` via `uses`
 - `conformance/railiance-fabric/mapping-expectations` via `maps`
@@ -184,6 +203,10 @@
 
 ## `model/security`
 
+- `benchmark/caring/kubernetes-rbac` via `stress_tests`
+- `benchmark/caring/kubernetes-rbac/access-descriptors` via `uses`
+- `benchmark/caring/kubernetes-rbac/caring-mapping` via `maps`
+- `benchmark/caring/kubernetes-rbac/findings` via `proposes`
 - `conformance/railiance-fabric` via `uses`
 - `conformance/railiance-fabric/entity-edge-capture-criteria` via `uses`
 - `conformance/railiance-fabric/mapping-expectations` via `maps`
@@ -296,6 +319,11 @@
 
 ## `standard/caring`
 
+- `benchmark/caring/kubernetes-rbac` via `conforms_to`
+- `benchmark/caring/kubernetes-rbac/access-descriptors` via `uses`
+- `benchmark/caring/kubernetes-rbac/caring-mapping` via `maps`
+- `benchmark/caring/kubernetes-rbac/findings` via `proposes`
+- `benchmark/caring/kubernetes-rbac/native-concepts` via `maps`
 - `evaluation/user-engine` via `uses`
 - `evaluation/user-engine/interface-card-expectations` via `uses`
 - `kernel/itc-kernel-map` via `maps`
@@ -304,6 +332,7 @@
 
 ## `standard/tagging`
 
+- `benchmark/caring/kubernetes-rbac` via `uses`
 - `comparison/repo-scoping/canon-benefit-analysis` via `maps`
 - `conformance/railiance-fabric` via `uses`
 - `kernel/itc-kernel-map` via `maps`