# Evaluate Trading-Literature Entity

Profile: {{ macros.profile }}

Evaluate the generated entity as Markdown with YAML frontmatter. Include
`artifact_id`, `evaluator`, `evaluated_at`, and a `scores` list. Score
each criterion on a 0 to 5 scale where 5 is best.

Required score names:

- `groundedness` — does the entity stay anchored to the source chunk,
  with no invented dates, dollar figures, or quotes?
- `lesson_clarity` — for `strategy`, `error`, `psychological_pattern`,
  and `evidence_bearing_claim` entities, is the operator-level lesson
  stated crisply enough to be reused in later chapters? For purely
  factual entities (trader, market, institution, instrument), score
  this on the clarity of the definition.
- `historical_context` — is the entity placed correctly in the era and
  venue of the source (e.g. early-1900s American equities) without
  importing modern terminology or instruments?
- `overgeneralization_risk` — is the entity scoped narrowly enough to
  resist becoming a vague universal claim? Higher score means lower
  risk. Flag entities that quietly claim to apply to all markets or
  all operators when the source restricts the claim.

Add a short `## Review Notes` section listing any specific lines from
the entity body that drove a low score on any criterion.

Entity artifact: {{ input.artifact_id }}
Entity title: {{ input.title }}

## Entity

{{ input.content }}