This repository has been archived on 2026-07-08. You can view files and clone it. You cannot open issues or pull requests or push a commit.
Files
infospace-bench/infospaces/lefevre-reminiscences-of-a-stock-operator/output/workflows/runs/f4732c7504fc.yaml

1216 lines
56 KiB
YAML

run_id: f4732c7504fc
workflow_id: generic-source-evaluations
status: completed
dry_run: false
inputs:
- name: entity
artifact_id: entity/entity-title-bucket-shop.md
kind: entity
title: 'Entity Title: Bucket Shop'
path: artifacts/entities/entity-title-bucket-shop.md
slug: entity-title-bucket-shop
content: '# Entity Title: Bucket Shop
## Definition
A bucket shop is a type of brokerage that allows speculative trading in stocks
without actually buying shares. These shops often manipulate market prices to
exploit their clients, leading to significant losses for traders.
## Category
market
'
- name: entity
artifact_id: entity/entity-title-sugar.md
kind: entity
title: 'Entity Title: Sugar'
path: artifacts/entities/entity-title-sugar.md
slug: entity-title-sugar
content: "# Entity Title: Sugar \n## Definition \nA specific stock that traders\
\ engage with, which is central to the narratives involving trading strategies\
\ and market manipulation. \n## Category \ninstrument \n## Context \nSugar\
\ is referenced in the context of a market manipulation scheme executed by bucket\
\ shops. \n## Source Evidence \n\"Henry Williams and I together were short six\
\ thousand shares of Sugar.\" \n\n---\n"
- name: entity
artifact_id: entity/entity-title-cosmopolitan.md
kind: entity
title: 'Entity Title: Cosmopolitan'
path: artifacts/entities/entity-title-cosmopolitan.md
slug: entity-title-cosmopolitan
content: '# Entity Title: Cosmopolitan
## Definition
The Cosmopolitan is identified as a bucket shop that engaged in manipulative practices,
specifically targeting short positions in Sugar by artificially inflating stock
prices.
## Category
institution
'
- name: entity
artifact_id: entity/entity-title-market-drive.md
kind: entity
title: 'Entity Title: Market Drive'
path: artifacts/entities/entity-title-market-drive.md
slug: entity-title-market-drive
content: "# Entity Title: Market Drive \n## Definition \nA tactic employed to\
\ artificially inflate or deflate stock prices in a way that leads to trader losses\
\ and profits for others. \n## Category \nstrategy \n## Context \nRefers to\
\ the strategy used by operators to manipulate stock prices causing losses for\
\ long holders. \n## Source Evidence \n\"whenever there was an unexplained sharp\
\ drop which was followed by instant recovery, the newspapers in those days used\
\ to call it a bucket-shop drive.\" \n\n---\n"
- name: entity
artifact_id: entity/entity-title-dollar-manipulation.md
kind: entity
title: 'Entity Title: Dollar Manipulation'
path: artifacts/entities/entity-title-dollar-manipulation.md
slug: entity-title-dollar-manipulation
content: "# Entity Title: Dollar Manipulation \n## Definition \nThe practice of\
\ manipulating stock prices to extract profits from the market, often at the expense\
\ of average investors. \n## Category \nerror \n## Context \nIt underscores\
\ the dangers of participating in manipulative market practices without adequate\
\ knowledge. \n## Source Evidence \n\"Their brokers in New York ran up the price\
\ to 108. Of course it fell right back, but Henry and a lot of others were wiped\
\ out.\" \n\n---\n"
- name: entity
artifact_id: entity/entity-title-new-york-stock-exchange.md
kind: entity
title: 'Entity Title: New York Stock Exchange'
path: artifacts/entities/entity-title-new-york-stock-exchange.md
slug: entity-title-new-york-stock-exchange
content: '# Entity Title: New York Stock Exchange
## Definition
The New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) is a major stock exchange where trading of
stocks occurs, serving as a venue for some of the trading activities mentioned
in the context of market manipulation.
## Category
market
'
- name: entity
artifact_id: entity/entity-title-western-union.md
kind: entity
title: 'Entity Title: Western Union'
path: artifacts/entities/entity-title-western-union.md
slug: entity-title-western-union
content: "# Entity Title: Western Union \n## Definition \nA specific stock favored\
\ for trading due to its liquidity and ease of price manipulation. \n## Category\
\ \ninstrument \n## Context \nReferencing a stock used strategically to execute\
\ manipulative trades benefiting the instigator. \n## Source Evidence \n\"One\
\ of his favorite stocks was Western Union, because it was so easy to move a semiactive\
\ stock like that a few points up or down.\"\n"
- name: entity
artifact_id: entity/entity-title-sugar-commodity.md
kind: entity
title: 'Entity Title: Sugar (Commodity)'
path: artifacts/entities/entity-title-sugar-commodity.md
slug: entity-title-sugar-commodity
content: '# Entity Title: Sugar (Commodity)
## Definition
Sugar refers to a specific commodity that is traded on the market, in this case,
associated with the incident involving Tom and Henry Williams, where their positions
were affected by market manipulation.
## Category
instrument
'
- name: entity
artifact_id: entity/entity-title-western-union-stock.md
kind: entity
title: 'Entity Title: Western Union (Stock)'
path: artifacts/entities/entity-title-western-union-stock.md
slug: entity-title-western-union-stock
content: '# Entity Title: Western Union (Stock)
## Definition
Western Union is a stock that was frequently manipulated by traders due to its
relative ease of movement within the market, making it a favored target for speculative
trading schemes.
## Category
instrument
'
- name: entity
artifact_id: entity/entity-title-bucket-shop-drive.md
kind: entity
title: 'Entity Title: Bucket-Shop Drive'
path: artifacts/entities/entity-title-bucket-shop-drive.md
slug: entity-title-bucket-shop-drive
content: '# Entity Title: Bucket-Shop Drive
## Definition
A bucket-shop drive refers to a situation where the prices of stocks are manipulated
downwards in a coordinated effort to force clients who are long on those stocks
to incur losses or be wiped out.
## Category
strategy
'
- name: entity
artifact_id: entity/entity-title-market-factor.md
kind: entity
title: 'Entity Title: Market Factor'
path: artifacts/entities/entity-title-market-factor.md
slug: entity-title-market-factor
content: '# Entity Title: Market Factor
## Definition
A market factor is an operator or trader who significantly influences trading
conditions or stock prices within the market. In the text, a certain trader is
identified as a market factor due to his previous successes in market manipulation.
## Category
trader
'
- name: entity
artifact_id: entity/entity-title-bryan-panic-of-96.md
kind: entity
title: "Entity Title: Bryan Panic of \u201996"
path: artifacts/entities/entity-title-bryan-panic-of-96.md
slug: entity-title-bryan-panic-of-96
content: "# Entity Title: Bryan Panic of \u201996\n## Definition\nThe Bryan Panic\
\ of 1896 was a financial crisis characterized by significant volatility and manipulation\
\ in the markets, leading to widespread impact on traders, including those in\
\ bucket shops.\n## Category\nevent\n"
- name: entity
artifact_id: entity/entity-title-short-position.md
kind: entity
title: 'Entity Title: Short Position'
path: artifacts/entities/entity-title-short-position.md
slug: entity-title-short-position
content: '# Entity Title: Short Position
## Definition
A short position refers to the practice of selling stocks that a trader does not
own, with the intention of buying them back at a lower price to profit from the
decline. It was a significant factor in the losses suffered by the traders in
the context.
## Category
strategy
'
- name: entity
artifact_id: entity/entity-title-bull-tips.md
kind: entity
title: 'Entity Title: Bull Tips'
path: artifacts/entities/entity-title-bull-tips.md
slug: entity-title-bull-tips
content: '# Entity Title: Bull Tips
## Definition
Bull tips are recommendations or information suggesting that a stock''s price
will rise, encouraging traders to buy. These were used strategically to influence
market movements in the discussed scenario.
## Category
evidence_bearing_claim
'
stages:
- stage_id: evaluate-entity
kind: assisted
status: completed
input_artifact_id: entity/entity-title-bucket-shop.md
output_artifact_id: generated/evaluation-entity-title-bucket-shop.md
provider: openrouter
metadata:
model: openai/gpt-4o-mini
request_id: gen-1779146193-6eewg9bA1MxNRYYTZsa5
usage:
prompt_tokens: 401
completion_tokens: 141
total_tokens: 542
cost: 0.00014475
is_byok: false
prompt_tokens_details:
cached_tokens: 0
cache_write_tokens: 0
audio_tokens: 0
video_tokens: 0
cost_details:
upstream_inference_cost: 0.00014475
upstream_inference_prompt_cost: 6.015e-05
upstream_inference_completions_cost: 8.46e-05
completion_tokens_details:
reasoning_tokens: 0
image_tokens: 0
audio_tokens: 0
retry_count: 0
duration_seconds: 2.813
- stage_id: evaluate-entity
kind: assisted
status: completed
input_artifact_id: entity/entity-title-sugar.md
output_artifact_id: generated/evaluation-entity-title-sugar.md
provider: openrouter
metadata:
model: openai/gpt-4o-mini
request_id: gen-1779146197-P8dNeSpFHLjnH032KR33
usage:
prompt_tokens: 423
completion_tokens: 157
total_tokens: 580
cost: 0.00015765
is_byok: false
prompt_tokens_details:
cached_tokens: 0
cache_write_tokens: 0
audio_tokens: 0
video_tokens: 0
cost_details:
upstream_inference_cost: 0.00015765
upstream_inference_prompt_cost: 6.345e-05
upstream_inference_completions_cost: 9.42e-05
completion_tokens_details:
reasoning_tokens: 0
image_tokens: 0
audio_tokens: 0
retry_count: 0
duration_seconds: 3.311
- stage_id: evaluate-entity
kind: assisted
status: completed
input_artifact_id: entity/entity-title-cosmopolitan.md
output_artifact_id: generated/evaluation-entity-title-cosmopolitan.md
provider: openrouter
metadata:
model: openai/gpt-4o-mini
request_id: gen-1779146201-14eaLCtdwLrQRNtsl0P0
usage:
prompt_tokens: 393
completion_tokens: 139
total_tokens: 532
cost: 0.00014235
is_byok: false
prompt_tokens_details:
cached_tokens: 0
cache_write_tokens: 0
audio_tokens: 0
video_tokens: 0
cost_details:
upstream_inference_cost: 0.00014235
upstream_inference_prompt_cost: 5.895e-05
upstream_inference_completions_cost: 8.34e-05
completion_tokens_details:
reasoning_tokens: 0
image_tokens: 0
audio_tokens: 0
retry_count: 0
duration_seconds: 3.064
- stage_id: evaluate-entity
kind: assisted
status: completed
input_artifact_id: entity/entity-title-market-drive.md
output_artifact_id: generated/evaluation-entity-title-market-drive.md
provider: openrouter
metadata:
model: openai/gpt-4o-mini
request_id: gen-1779146205-YIVaxWEGh2A84PErKtKh
usage:
prompt_tokens: 447
completion_tokens: 156
total_tokens: 603
cost: 0.00016065
is_byok: false
prompt_tokens_details:
cached_tokens: 0
cache_write_tokens: 0
audio_tokens: 0
video_tokens: 0
cost_details:
upstream_inference_cost: 0.00016065
upstream_inference_prompt_cost: 6.705e-05
upstream_inference_completions_cost: 9.36e-05
completion_tokens_details:
reasoning_tokens: 0
image_tokens: 0
audio_tokens: 0
retry_count: 0
duration_seconds: 3.273
- stage_id: evaluate-entity
kind: assisted
status: completed
input_artifact_id: entity/entity-title-dollar-manipulation.md
output_artifact_id: generated/evaluation-entity-title-dollar-manipulation.md
provider: openrouter
metadata:
model: openai/gpt-4o-mini
request_id: gen-1779146209-Rb1amtJliQTYh9XgfFfz
usage:
prompt_tokens: 446
completion_tokens: 159
total_tokens: 605
cost: 0.0001623
is_byok: false
prompt_tokens_details:
cached_tokens: 0
cache_write_tokens: 0
audio_tokens: 0
video_tokens: 0
cost_details:
upstream_inference_cost: 0.0001623
upstream_inference_prompt_cost: 6.69e-05
upstream_inference_completions_cost: 9.54e-05
completion_tokens_details:
reasoning_tokens: 0
image_tokens: 0
audio_tokens: 0
retry_count: 0
duration_seconds: 4.164
- stage_id: evaluate-entity
kind: assisted
status: completed
input_artifact_id: entity/entity-title-new-york-stock-exchange.md
output_artifact_id: generated/evaluation-entity-title-new-york-stock-exchange.md
provider: openrouter
metadata:
model: openai/gpt-4o-mini
request_id: gen-1779146215-Brv5ZbIzkc9wxy1jPq6Y
usage:
prompt_tokens: 408
completion_tokens: 133
total_tokens: 541
cost: 0.000141
is_byok: false
prompt_tokens_details:
cached_tokens: 0
cache_write_tokens: 0
audio_tokens: 0
video_tokens: 0
cost_details:
upstream_inference_cost: 0.000141
upstream_inference_prompt_cost: 6.12e-05
upstream_inference_completions_cost: 7.98e-05
completion_tokens_details:
reasoning_tokens: 0
image_tokens: 0
audio_tokens: 0
retry_count: 0
duration_seconds: 3.303
- stage_id: evaluate-entity
kind: assisted
status: completed
input_artifact_id: entity/entity-title-western-union.md
output_artifact_id: generated/evaluation-entity-title-western-union.md
provider: openrouter
metadata:
model: openai/gpt-4o-mini
request_id: gen-1779146219-BV94C3WtvtYONIkaTvv2
usage:
prompt_tokens: 438
completion_tokens: 139
total_tokens: 577
cost: 0.0001491
is_byok: false
prompt_tokens_details:
cached_tokens: 0
cache_write_tokens: 0
audio_tokens: 0
video_tokens: 0
cost_details:
upstream_inference_cost: 0.0001491
upstream_inference_prompt_cost: 6.57e-05
upstream_inference_completions_cost: 8.34e-05
completion_tokens_details:
reasoning_tokens: 0
image_tokens: 0
audio_tokens: 0
retry_count: 0
duration_seconds: 2.512
- stage_id: evaluate-entity
kind: assisted
status: completed
input_artifact_id: entity/entity-title-sugar-commodity.md
output_artifact_id: generated/evaluation-entity-title-sugar-commodity.md
provider: openrouter
metadata:
model: openai/gpt-4o-mini
request_id: gen-1779146223-O0Cl1VuCgEOjNquspWcq
usage:
prompt_tokens: 403
completion_tokens: 139
total_tokens: 542
cost: 0.00014385
is_byok: false
prompt_tokens_details:
cached_tokens: 0
cache_write_tokens: 0
audio_tokens: 0
video_tokens: 0
cost_details:
upstream_inference_cost: 0.00014385
upstream_inference_prompt_cost: 6.045e-05
upstream_inference_completions_cost: 8.34e-05
completion_tokens_details:
reasoning_tokens: 0
image_tokens: 0
audio_tokens: 0
retry_count: 0
duration_seconds: 2.67
- stage_id: evaluate-entity
kind: assisted
status: completed
input_artifact_id: entity/entity-title-western-union-stock.md
output_artifact_id: generated/evaluation-entity-title-western-union-stock.md
provider: openrouter
metadata:
model: openai/gpt-4o-mini
request_id: gen-1779146227-qpEa5PX9NtsYDREgNRxU
usage:
prompt_tokens: 402
completion_tokens: 128
total_tokens: 530
cost: 0.0001371
is_byok: false
prompt_tokens_details:
cached_tokens: 0
cache_write_tokens: 0
audio_tokens: 0
video_tokens: 0
cost_details:
upstream_inference_cost: 0.0001371
upstream_inference_prompt_cost: 6.03e-05
upstream_inference_completions_cost: 7.68e-05
completion_tokens_details:
reasoning_tokens: 0
image_tokens: 0
audio_tokens: 0
retry_count: 0
duration_seconds: 2.507
- stage_id: evaluate-entity
kind: assisted
status: completed
input_artifact_id: entity/entity-title-bucket-shop-drive.md
output_artifact_id: generated/evaluation-entity-title-bucket-shop-drive.md
provider: openrouter
metadata:
model: openai/gpt-4o-mini
request_id: gen-1779146230-lIDRlb48UZxhQXnfHxET
usage:
prompt_tokens: 405
completion_tokens: 178
total_tokens: 583
cost: 0.00016755
is_byok: false
prompt_tokens_details:
cached_tokens: 0
cache_write_tokens: 0
audio_tokens: 0
video_tokens: 0
cost_details:
upstream_inference_cost: 0.00016755
upstream_inference_prompt_cost: 6.075e-05
upstream_inference_completions_cost: 0.0001068
completion_tokens_details:
reasoning_tokens: 0
image_tokens: 0
audio_tokens: 0
retry_count: 0
duration_seconds: 3.512
- stage_id: evaluate-entity
kind: assisted
status: completed
input_artifact_id: entity/entity-title-market-factor.md
output_artifact_id: generated/evaluation-entity-title-market-factor.md
provider: openrouter
metadata:
model: openai/gpt-4o-mini
request_id: gen-1779146234-4sIcU9coqO6qAd4TZe9J
usage:
prompt_tokens: 406
completion_tokens: 148
total_tokens: 554
cost: 0.0001497
is_byok: false
prompt_tokens_details:
cached_tokens: 0
cache_write_tokens: 0
audio_tokens: 0
video_tokens: 0
cost_details:
upstream_inference_cost: 0.0001497
upstream_inference_prompt_cost: 6.09e-05
upstream_inference_completions_cost: 8.88e-05
completion_tokens_details:
reasoning_tokens: 0
image_tokens: 0
audio_tokens: 0
retry_count: 0
duration_seconds: 2.937
- stage_id: evaluate-entity
kind: assisted
status: completed
input_artifact_id: entity/entity-title-bryan-panic-of-96.md
output_artifact_id: generated/evaluation-entity-title-bryan-panic-of-96.md
provider: openrouter
metadata:
model: openai/gpt-4o-mini
request_id: gen-1779146239-2MYOeqdsEBiVwamUt1OR
usage:
prompt_tokens: 409
completion_tokens: 197
total_tokens: 606
cost: 0.00017955
is_byok: false
prompt_tokens_details:
cached_tokens: 0
cache_write_tokens: 0
audio_tokens: 0
video_tokens: 0
cost_details:
upstream_inference_cost: 0.00017955
upstream_inference_prompt_cost: 6.135e-05
upstream_inference_completions_cost: 0.0001182
completion_tokens_details:
reasoning_tokens: 0
image_tokens: 0
audio_tokens: 0
retry_count: 0
duration_seconds: 4.1
- stage_id: evaluate-entity
kind: assisted
status: completed
input_artifact_id: entity/entity-title-short-position.md
output_artifact_id: generated/evaluation-entity-title-short-position.md
provider: openrouter
metadata:
model: openai/gpt-4o-mini
request_id: gen-1779146245-yKJ1Zq3dMjrqe8RaZpdL
usage:
prompt_tokens: 413
completion_tokens: 143
total_tokens: 556
cost: 0.00014775
is_byok: false
prompt_tokens_details:
cached_tokens: 0
cache_write_tokens: 0
audio_tokens: 0
video_tokens: 0
cost_details:
upstream_inference_cost: 0.00014775
upstream_inference_prompt_cost: 6.195e-05
upstream_inference_completions_cost: 8.58e-05
completion_tokens_details:
reasoning_tokens: 0
image_tokens: 0
audio_tokens: 0
retry_count: 0
duration_seconds: 3.921
- stage_id: evaluate-entity
kind: assisted
status: completed
input_artifact_id: entity/entity-title-bull-tips.md
output_artifact_id: generated/evaluation-entity-title-bull-tips.md
provider: openrouter
metadata:
model: openai/gpt-4o-mini
request_id: gen-1779146249-h4eDeyh9ejilKIZi7gR5
usage:
prompt_tokens: 402
completion_tokens: 168
total_tokens: 570
cost: 0.0001611
is_byok: false
prompt_tokens_details:
cached_tokens: 0
cache_write_tokens: 0
audio_tokens: 0
video_tokens: 0
cost_details:
upstream_inference_cost: 0.0001611
upstream_inference_prompt_cost: 6.03e-05
upstream_inference_completions_cost: 0.0001008
completion_tokens_details:
reasoning_tokens: 0
image_tokens: 0
audio_tokens: 0
retry_count: 0
duration_seconds: 3.464
outputs:
- stage_id: evaluate-entity
artifact_id: generated/evaluation-entity-title-bucket-shop.md
path: output/evaluations/entity-title-bucket-shop.md
kind: generated
title: 'Entity Title: Bucket Shop Evaluation'
input_artifact_id: entity/entity-title-bucket-shop.md
written: true
- stage_id: evaluate-entity
artifact_id: generated/evaluation-entity-title-sugar.md
path: output/evaluations/entity-title-sugar.md
kind: generated
title: 'Entity Title: Sugar Evaluation'
input_artifact_id: entity/entity-title-sugar.md
written: true
- stage_id: evaluate-entity
artifact_id: generated/evaluation-entity-title-cosmopolitan.md
path: output/evaluations/entity-title-cosmopolitan.md
kind: generated
title: 'Entity Title: Cosmopolitan Evaluation'
input_artifact_id: entity/entity-title-cosmopolitan.md
written: true
- stage_id: evaluate-entity
artifact_id: generated/evaluation-entity-title-market-drive.md
path: output/evaluations/entity-title-market-drive.md
kind: generated
title: 'Entity Title: Market Drive Evaluation'
input_artifact_id: entity/entity-title-market-drive.md
written: true
- stage_id: evaluate-entity
artifact_id: generated/evaluation-entity-title-dollar-manipulation.md
path: output/evaluations/entity-title-dollar-manipulation.md
kind: generated
title: 'Entity Title: Dollar Manipulation Evaluation'
input_artifact_id: entity/entity-title-dollar-manipulation.md
written: true
- stage_id: evaluate-entity
artifact_id: generated/evaluation-entity-title-new-york-stock-exchange.md
path: output/evaluations/entity-title-new-york-stock-exchange.md
kind: generated
title: 'Entity Title: New York Stock Exchange Evaluation'
input_artifact_id: entity/entity-title-new-york-stock-exchange.md
written: true
- stage_id: evaluate-entity
artifact_id: generated/evaluation-entity-title-western-union.md
path: output/evaluations/entity-title-western-union.md
kind: generated
title: 'Entity Title: Western Union Evaluation'
input_artifact_id: entity/entity-title-western-union.md
written: true
- stage_id: evaluate-entity
artifact_id: generated/evaluation-entity-title-sugar-commodity.md
path: output/evaluations/entity-title-sugar-commodity.md
kind: generated
title: 'Entity Title: Sugar (Commodity) Evaluation'
input_artifact_id: entity/entity-title-sugar-commodity.md
written: true
- stage_id: evaluate-entity
artifact_id: generated/evaluation-entity-title-western-union-stock.md
path: output/evaluations/entity-title-western-union-stock.md
kind: generated
title: 'Entity Title: Western Union (Stock) Evaluation'
input_artifact_id: entity/entity-title-western-union-stock.md
written: true
- stage_id: evaluate-entity
artifact_id: generated/evaluation-entity-title-bucket-shop-drive.md
path: output/evaluations/entity-title-bucket-shop-drive.md
kind: generated
title: 'Entity Title: Bucket-Shop Drive Evaluation'
input_artifact_id: entity/entity-title-bucket-shop-drive.md
written: true
- stage_id: evaluate-entity
artifact_id: generated/evaluation-entity-title-market-factor.md
path: output/evaluations/entity-title-market-factor.md
kind: generated
title: 'Entity Title: Market Factor Evaluation'
input_artifact_id: entity/entity-title-market-factor.md
written: true
- stage_id: evaluate-entity
artifact_id: generated/evaluation-entity-title-bryan-panic-of-96.md
path: output/evaluations/entity-title-bryan-panic-of-96.md
kind: generated
title: "Entity Title: Bryan Panic of \u201996 Evaluation"
input_artifact_id: entity/entity-title-bryan-panic-of-96.md
written: true
- stage_id: evaluate-entity
artifact_id: generated/evaluation-entity-title-short-position.md
path: output/evaluations/entity-title-short-position.md
kind: generated
title: 'Entity Title: Short Position Evaluation'
input_artifact_id: entity/entity-title-short-position.md
written: true
- stage_id: evaluate-entity
artifact_id: generated/evaluation-entity-title-bull-tips.md
path: output/evaluations/entity-title-bull-tips.md
kind: generated
title: 'Entity Title: Bull Tips Evaluation'
input_artifact_id: entity/entity-title-bull-tips.md
written: true
assisted_requests:
- stage_id: evaluate-entity
workflow_id: generic-source-evaluations
input_artifact_id: entity/entity-title-bucket-shop.md
prompt: "# Evaluate Trading-Literature Entity\n\nProfile: trading-literature\n\n\
Evaluate the generated entity as Markdown with YAML frontmatter. Include\n`artifact_id`,\
\ `evaluator`, `evaluated_at`, and a `scores` list. Score\neach criterion on a\
\ 0 to 5 scale where 5 is best.\n\nRequired score names:\n\n- `groundedness` \u2014\
\ does the entity stay anchored to the source chunk,\n with no invented dates,\
\ dollar figures, or quotes?\n- `lesson_clarity` \u2014 for `strategy`, `error`,\
\ `psychological_pattern`,\n and `evidence_bearing_claim` entities, is the operator-level\
\ lesson\n stated crisply enough to be reused in later chapters? For purely\n\
\ factual entities (trader, market, institution, instrument), score\n this on\
\ the clarity of the definition.\n- `historical_context` \u2014 is the entity\
\ placed correctly in the era and\n venue of the source (e.g. early-1900s American\
\ equities) without\n importing modern terminology or instruments?\n- `overgeneralization_risk`\
\ \u2014 is the entity scoped narrowly enough to\n resist becoming a vague universal\
\ claim? Higher score means lower\n risk. Flag entities that quietly claim to\
\ apply to all markets or\n all operators when the source restricts the claim.\n\
\nAdd a short `## Review Notes` section listing any specific lines from\nthe entity\
\ body that drove a low score on any criterion.\n\nEntity artifact: entity/entity-title-bucket-shop.md\n\
Entity title: Entity Title: Bucket Shop\n\n## Entity\n\n# Entity Title: Bucket\
\ Shop\n## Definition\nA bucket shop is a type of brokerage that allows speculative\
\ trading in stocks without actually buying shares. These shops often manipulate\
\ market prices to exploit their clients, leading to significant losses for traders.\n\
## Category\nmarket\n\n"
provider_hint: openrouter
metadata:
output:
path: output/evaluations/{{ input.slug }}.md
kind: generated
artifact_id: generated/evaluation-{{ input.slug }}.md
title: '{{ input.title }} Evaluation'
- stage_id: evaluate-entity
workflow_id: generic-source-evaluations
input_artifact_id: entity/entity-title-sugar.md
prompt: "# Evaluate Trading-Literature Entity\n\nProfile: trading-literature\n\n\
Evaluate the generated entity as Markdown with YAML frontmatter. Include\n`artifact_id`,\
\ `evaluator`, `evaluated_at`, and a `scores` list. Score\neach criterion on a\
\ 0 to 5 scale where 5 is best.\n\nRequired score names:\n\n- `groundedness` \u2014\
\ does the entity stay anchored to the source chunk,\n with no invented dates,\
\ dollar figures, or quotes?\n- `lesson_clarity` \u2014 for `strategy`, `error`,\
\ `psychological_pattern`,\n and `evidence_bearing_claim` entities, is the operator-level\
\ lesson\n stated crisply enough to be reused in later chapters? For purely\n\
\ factual entities (trader, market, institution, instrument), score\n this on\
\ the clarity of the definition.\n- `historical_context` \u2014 is the entity\
\ placed correctly in the era and\n venue of the source (e.g. early-1900s American\
\ equities) without\n importing modern terminology or instruments?\n- `overgeneralization_risk`\
\ \u2014 is the entity scoped narrowly enough to\n resist becoming a vague universal\
\ claim? Higher score means lower\n risk. Flag entities that quietly claim to\
\ apply to all markets or\n all operators when the source restricts the claim.\n\
\nAdd a short `## Review Notes` section listing any specific lines from\nthe entity\
\ body that drove a low score on any criterion.\n\nEntity artifact: entity/entity-title-sugar.md\n\
Entity title: Entity Title: Sugar\n\n## Entity\n\n# Entity Title: Sugar \n##\
\ Definition \nA specific stock that traders engage with, which is central to\
\ the narratives involving trading strategies and market manipulation. \n## Category\
\ \ninstrument \n## Context \nSugar is referenced in the context of a market\
\ manipulation scheme executed by bucket shops. \n## Source Evidence \n\"Henry\
\ Williams and I together were short six thousand shares of Sugar.\" \n\n---\n\
\n"
provider_hint: openrouter
metadata:
output:
path: output/evaluations/{{ input.slug }}.md
kind: generated
artifact_id: generated/evaluation-{{ input.slug }}.md
title: '{{ input.title }} Evaluation'
- stage_id: evaluate-entity
workflow_id: generic-source-evaluations
input_artifact_id: entity/entity-title-cosmopolitan.md
prompt: "# Evaluate Trading-Literature Entity\n\nProfile: trading-literature\n\n\
Evaluate the generated entity as Markdown with YAML frontmatter. Include\n`artifact_id`,\
\ `evaluator`, `evaluated_at`, and a `scores` list. Score\neach criterion on a\
\ 0 to 5 scale where 5 is best.\n\nRequired score names:\n\n- `groundedness` \u2014\
\ does the entity stay anchored to the source chunk,\n with no invented dates,\
\ dollar figures, or quotes?\n- `lesson_clarity` \u2014 for `strategy`, `error`,\
\ `psychological_pattern`,\n and `evidence_bearing_claim` entities, is the operator-level\
\ lesson\n stated crisply enough to be reused in later chapters? For purely\n\
\ factual entities (trader, market, institution, instrument), score\n this on\
\ the clarity of the definition.\n- `historical_context` \u2014 is the entity\
\ placed correctly in the era and\n venue of the source (e.g. early-1900s American\
\ equities) without\n importing modern terminology or instruments?\n- `overgeneralization_risk`\
\ \u2014 is the entity scoped narrowly enough to\n resist becoming a vague universal\
\ claim? Higher score means lower\n risk. Flag entities that quietly claim to\
\ apply to all markets or\n all operators when the source restricts the claim.\n\
\nAdd a short `## Review Notes` section listing any specific lines from\nthe entity\
\ body that drove a low score on any criterion.\n\nEntity artifact: entity/entity-title-cosmopolitan.md\n\
Entity title: Entity Title: Cosmopolitan\n\n## Entity\n\n# Entity Title: Cosmopolitan\n\
## Definition\nThe Cosmopolitan is identified as a bucket shop that engaged in\
\ manipulative practices, specifically targeting short positions in Sugar by artificially\
\ inflating stock prices.\n## Category\ninstitution\n\n"
provider_hint: openrouter
metadata:
output:
path: output/evaluations/{{ input.slug }}.md
kind: generated
artifact_id: generated/evaluation-{{ input.slug }}.md
title: '{{ input.title }} Evaluation'
- stage_id: evaluate-entity
workflow_id: generic-source-evaluations
input_artifact_id: entity/entity-title-market-drive.md
prompt: "# Evaluate Trading-Literature Entity\n\nProfile: trading-literature\n\n\
Evaluate the generated entity as Markdown with YAML frontmatter. Include\n`artifact_id`,\
\ `evaluator`, `evaluated_at`, and a `scores` list. Score\neach criterion on a\
\ 0 to 5 scale where 5 is best.\n\nRequired score names:\n\n- `groundedness` \u2014\
\ does the entity stay anchored to the source chunk,\n with no invented dates,\
\ dollar figures, or quotes?\n- `lesson_clarity` \u2014 for `strategy`, `error`,\
\ `psychological_pattern`,\n and `evidence_bearing_claim` entities, is the operator-level\
\ lesson\n stated crisply enough to be reused in later chapters? For purely\n\
\ factual entities (trader, market, institution, instrument), score\n this on\
\ the clarity of the definition.\n- `historical_context` \u2014 is the entity\
\ placed correctly in the era and\n venue of the source (e.g. early-1900s American\
\ equities) without\n importing modern terminology or instruments?\n- `overgeneralization_risk`\
\ \u2014 is the entity scoped narrowly enough to\n resist becoming a vague universal\
\ claim? Higher score means lower\n risk. Flag entities that quietly claim to\
\ apply to all markets or\n all operators when the source restricts the claim.\n\
\nAdd a short `## Review Notes` section listing any specific lines from\nthe entity\
\ body that drove a low score on any criterion.\n\nEntity artifact: entity/entity-title-market-drive.md\n\
Entity title: Entity Title: Market Drive\n\n## Entity\n\n# Entity Title: Market\
\ Drive \n## Definition \nA tactic employed to artificially inflate or deflate\
\ stock prices in a way that leads to trader losses and profits for others. \n\
## Category \nstrategy \n## Context \nRefers to the strategy used by operators\
\ to manipulate stock prices causing losses for long holders. \n## Source Evidence\
\ \n\"whenever there was an unexplained sharp drop which was followed by instant\
\ recovery, the newspapers in those days used to call it a bucket-shop drive.\"\
\ \n\n---\n\n"
provider_hint: openrouter
metadata:
output:
path: output/evaluations/{{ input.slug }}.md
kind: generated
artifact_id: generated/evaluation-{{ input.slug }}.md
title: '{{ input.title }} Evaluation'
- stage_id: evaluate-entity
workflow_id: generic-source-evaluations
input_artifact_id: entity/entity-title-dollar-manipulation.md
prompt: "# Evaluate Trading-Literature Entity\n\nProfile: trading-literature\n\n\
Evaluate the generated entity as Markdown with YAML frontmatter. Include\n`artifact_id`,\
\ `evaluator`, `evaluated_at`, and a `scores` list. Score\neach criterion on a\
\ 0 to 5 scale where 5 is best.\n\nRequired score names:\n\n- `groundedness` \u2014\
\ does the entity stay anchored to the source chunk,\n with no invented dates,\
\ dollar figures, or quotes?\n- `lesson_clarity` \u2014 for `strategy`, `error`,\
\ `psychological_pattern`,\n and `evidence_bearing_claim` entities, is the operator-level\
\ lesson\n stated crisply enough to be reused in later chapters? For purely\n\
\ factual entities (trader, market, institution, instrument), score\n this on\
\ the clarity of the definition.\n- `historical_context` \u2014 is the entity\
\ placed correctly in the era and\n venue of the source (e.g. early-1900s American\
\ equities) without\n importing modern terminology or instruments?\n- `overgeneralization_risk`\
\ \u2014 is the entity scoped narrowly enough to\n resist becoming a vague universal\
\ claim? Higher score means lower\n risk. Flag entities that quietly claim to\
\ apply to all markets or\n all operators when the source restricts the claim.\n\
\nAdd a short `## Review Notes` section listing any specific lines from\nthe entity\
\ body that drove a low score on any criterion.\n\nEntity artifact: entity/entity-title-dollar-manipulation.md\n\
Entity title: Entity Title: Dollar Manipulation\n\n## Entity\n\n# Entity Title:\
\ Dollar Manipulation \n## Definition \nThe practice of manipulating stock prices\
\ to extract profits from the market, often at the expense of average investors.\
\ \n## Category \nerror \n## Context \nIt underscores the dangers of participating\
\ in manipulative market practices without adequate knowledge. \n## Source Evidence\
\ \n\"Their brokers in New York ran up the price to 108. Of course it fell right\
\ back, but Henry and a lot of others were wiped out.\" \n\n---\n\n"
provider_hint: openrouter
metadata:
output:
path: output/evaluations/{{ input.slug }}.md
kind: generated
artifact_id: generated/evaluation-{{ input.slug }}.md
title: '{{ input.title }} Evaluation'
- stage_id: evaluate-entity
workflow_id: generic-source-evaluations
input_artifact_id: entity/entity-title-new-york-stock-exchange.md
prompt: "# Evaluate Trading-Literature Entity\n\nProfile: trading-literature\n\n\
Evaluate the generated entity as Markdown with YAML frontmatter. Include\n`artifact_id`,\
\ `evaluator`, `evaluated_at`, and a `scores` list. Score\neach criterion on a\
\ 0 to 5 scale where 5 is best.\n\nRequired score names:\n\n- `groundedness` \u2014\
\ does the entity stay anchored to the source chunk,\n with no invented dates,\
\ dollar figures, or quotes?\n- `lesson_clarity` \u2014 for `strategy`, `error`,\
\ `psychological_pattern`,\n and `evidence_bearing_claim` entities, is the operator-level\
\ lesson\n stated crisply enough to be reused in later chapters? For purely\n\
\ factual entities (trader, market, institution, instrument), score\n this on\
\ the clarity of the definition.\n- `historical_context` \u2014 is the entity\
\ placed correctly in the era and\n venue of the source (e.g. early-1900s American\
\ equities) without\n importing modern terminology or instruments?\n- `overgeneralization_risk`\
\ \u2014 is the entity scoped narrowly enough to\n resist becoming a vague universal\
\ claim? Higher score means lower\n risk. Flag entities that quietly claim to\
\ apply to all markets or\n all operators when the source restricts the claim.\n\
\nAdd a short `## Review Notes` section listing any specific lines from\nthe entity\
\ body that drove a low score on any criterion.\n\nEntity artifact: entity/entity-title-new-york-stock-exchange.md\n\
Entity title: Entity Title: New York Stock Exchange\n\n## Entity\n\n# Entity Title:\
\ New York Stock Exchange\n## Definition\nThe New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) is\
\ a major stock exchange where trading of stocks occurs, serving as a venue for\
\ some of the trading activities mentioned in the context of market manipulation.\n\
## Category\nmarket\n\n"
provider_hint: openrouter
metadata:
output:
path: output/evaluations/{{ input.slug }}.md
kind: generated
artifact_id: generated/evaluation-{{ input.slug }}.md
title: '{{ input.title }} Evaluation'
- stage_id: evaluate-entity
workflow_id: generic-source-evaluations
input_artifact_id: entity/entity-title-western-union.md
prompt: "# Evaluate Trading-Literature Entity\n\nProfile: trading-literature\n\n\
Evaluate the generated entity as Markdown with YAML frontmatter. Include\n`artifact_id`,\
\ `evaluator`, `evaluated_at`, and a `scores` list. Score\neach criterion on a\
\ 0 to 5 scale where 5 is best.\n\nRequired score names:\n\n- `groundedness` \u2014\
\ does the entity stay anchored to the source chunk,\n with no invented dates,\
\ dollar figures, or quotes?\n- `lesson_clarity` \u2014 for `strategy`, `error`,\
\ `psychological_pattern`,\n and `evidence_bearing_claim` entities, is the operator-level\
\ lesson\n stated crisply enough to be reused in later chapters? For purely\n\
\ factual entities (trader, market, institution, instrument), score\n this on\
\ the clarity of the definition.\n- `historical_context` \u2014 is the entity\
\ placed correctly in the era and\n venue of the source (e.g. early-1900s American\
\ equities) without\n importing modern terminology or instruments?\n- `overgeneralization_risk`\
\ \u2014 is the entity scoped narrowly enough to\n resist becoming a vague universal\
\ claim? Higher score means lower\n risk. Flag entities that quietly claim to\
\ apply to all markets or\n all operators when the source restricts the claim.\n\
\nAdd a short `## Review Notes` section listing any specific lines from\nthe entity\
\ body that drove a low score on any criterion.\n\nEntity artifact: entity/entity-title-western-union.md\n\
Entity title: Entity Title: Western Union\n\n## Entity\n\n# Entity Title: Western\
\ Union \n## Definition \nA specific stock favored for trading due to its liquidity\
\ and ease of price manipulation. \n## Category \ninstrument \n## Context \
\ \nReferencing a stock used strategically to execute manipulative trades benefiting\
\ the instigator. \n## Source Evidence \n\"One of his favorite stocks was Western\
\ Union, because it was so easy to move a semiactive stock like that a few points\
\ up or down.\"\n\n"
provider_hint: openrouter
metadata:
output:
path: output/evaluations/{{ input.slug }}.md
kind: generated
artifact_id: generated/evaluation-{{ input.slug }}.md
title: '{{ input.title }} Evaluation'
- stage_id: evaluate-entity
workflow_id: generic-source-evaluations
input_artifact_id: entity/entity-title-sugar-commodity.md
prompt: "# Evaluate Trading-Literature Entity\n\nProfile: trading-literature\n\n\
Evaluate the generated entity as Markdown with YAML frontmatter. Include\n`artifact_id`,\
\ `evaluator`, `evaluated_at`, and a `scores` list. Score\neach criterion on a\
\ 0 to 5 scale where 5 is best.\n\nRequired score names:\n\n- `groundedness` \u2014\
\ does the entity stay anchored to the source chunk,\n with no invented dates,\
\ dollar figures, or quotes?\n- `lesson_clarity` \u2014 for `strategy`, `error`,\
\ `psychological_pattern`,\n and `evidence_bearing_claim` entities, is the operator-level\
\ lesson\n stated crisply enough to be reused in later chapters? For purely\n\
\ factual entities (trader, market, institution, instrument), score\n this on\
\ the clarity of the definition.\n- `historical_context` \u2014 is the entity\
\ placed correctly in the era and\n venue of the source (e.g. early-1900s American\
\ equities) without\n importing modern terminology or instruments?\n- `overgeneralization_risk`\
\ \u2014 is the entity scoped narrowly enough to\n resist becoming a vague universal\
\ claim? Higher score means lower\n risk. Flag entities that quietly claim to\
\ apply to all markets or\n all operators when the source restricts the claim.\n\
\nAdd a short `## Review Notes` section listing any specific lines from\nthe entity\
\ body that drove a low score on any criterion.\n\nEntity artifact: entity/entity-title-sugar-commodity.md\n\
Entity title: Entity Title: Sugar (Commodity)\n\n## Entity\n\n# Entity Title:\
\ Sugar (Commodity)\n## Definition\nSugar refers to a specific commodity that\
\ is traded on the market, in this case, associated with the incident involving\
\ Tom and Henry Williams, where their positions were affected by market manipulation.\n\
## Category\ninstrument\n\n"
provider_hint: openrouter
metadata:
output:
path: output/evaluations/{{ input.slug }}.md
kind: generated
artifact_id: generated/evaluation-{{ input.slug }}.md
title: '{{ input.title }} Evaluation'
- stage_id: evaluate-entity
workflow_id: generic-source-evaluations
input_artifact_id: entity/entity-title-western-union-stock.md
prompt: "# Evaluate Trading-Literature Entity\n\nProfile: trading-literature\n\n\
Evaluate the generated entity as Markdown with YAML frontmatter. Include\n`artifact_id`,\
\ `evaluator`, `evaluated_at`, and a `scores` list. Score\neach criterion on a\
\ 0 to 5 scale where 5 is best.\n\nRequired score names:\n\n- `groundedness` \u2014\
\ does the entity stay anchored to the source chunk,\n with no invented dates,\
\ dollar figures, or quotes?\n- `lesson_clarity` \u2014 for `strategy`, `error`,\
\ `psychological_pattern`,\n and `evidence_bearing_claim` entities, is the operator-level\
\ lesson\n stated crisply enough to be reused in later chapters? For purely\n\
\ factual entities (trader, market, institution, instrument), score\n this on\
\ the clarity of the definition.\n- `historical_context` \u2014 is the entity\
\ placed correctly in the era and\n venue of the source (e.g. early-1900s American\
\ equities) without\n importing modern terminology or instruments?\n- `overgeneralization_risk`\
\ \u2014 is the entity scoped narrowly enough to\n resist becoming a vague universal\
\ claim? Higher score means lower\n risk. Flag entities that quietly claim to\
\ apply to all markets or\n all operators when the source restricts the claim.\n\
\nAdd a short `## Review Notes` section listing any specific lines from\nthe entity\
\ body that drove a low score on any criterion.\n\nEntity artifact: entity/entity-title-western-union-stock.md\n\
Entity title: Entity Title: Western Union (Stock)\n\n## Entity\n\n# Entity Title:\
\ Western Union (Stock)\n## Definition\nWestern Union is a stock that was frequently\
\ manipulated by traders due to its relative ease of movement within the market,\
\ making it a favored target for speculative trading schemes.\n## Category\ninstrument\n\
\n"
provider_hint: openrouter
metadata:
output:
path: output/evaluations/{{ input.slug }}.md
kind: generated
artifact_id: generated/evaluation-{{ input.slug }}.md
title: '{{ input.title }} Evaluation'
- stage_id: evaluate-entity
workflow_id: generic-source-evaluations
input_artifact_id: entity/entity-title-bucket-shop-drive.md
prompt: "# Evaluate Trading-Literature Entity\n\nProfile: trading-literature\n\n\
Evaluate the generated entity as Markdown with YAML frontmatter. Include\n`artifact_id`,\
\ `evaluator`, `evaluated_at`, and a `scores` list. Score\neach criterion on a\
\ 0 to 5 scale where 5 is best.\n\nRequired score names:\n\n- `groundedness` \u2014\
\ does the entity stay anchored to the source chunk,\n with no invented dates,\
\ dollar figures, or quotes?\n- `lesson_clarity` \u2014 for `strategy`, `error`,\
\ `psychological_pattern`,\n and `evidence_bearing_claim` entities, is the operator-level\
\ lesson\n stated crisply enough to be reused in later chapters? For purely\n\
\ factual entities (trader, market, institution, instrument), score\n this on\
\ the clarity of the definition.\n- `historical_context` \u2014 is the entity\
\ placed correctly in the era and\n venue of the source (e.g. early-1900s American\
\ equities) without\n importing modern terminology or instruments?\n- `overgeneralization_risk`\
\ \u2014 is the entity scoped narrowly enough to\n resist becoming a vague universal\
\ claim? Higher score means lower\n risk. Flag entities that quietly claim to\
\ apply to all markets or\n all operators when the source restricts the claim.\n\
\nAdd a short `## Review Notes` section listing any specific lines from\nthe entity\
\ body that drove a low score on any criterion.\n\nEntity artifact: entity/entity-title-bucket-shop-drive.md\n\
Entity title: Entity Title: Bucket-Shop Drive\n\n## Entity\n\n# Entity Title:\
\ Bucket-Shop Drive\n## Definition\nA bucket-shop drive refers to a situation\
\ where the prices of stocks are manipulated downwards in a coordinated effort\
\ to force clients who are long on those stocks to incur losses or be wiped out.\n\
## Category\nstrategy\n\n"
provider_hint: openrouter
metadata:
output:
path: output/evaluations/{{ input.slug }}.md
kind: generated
artifact_id: generated/evaluation-{{ input.slug }}.md
title: '{{ input.title }} Evaluation'
- stage_id: evaluate-entity
workflow_id: generic-source-evaluations
input_artifact_id: entity/entity-title-market-factor.md
prompt: "# Evaluate Trading-Literature Entity\n\nProfile: trading-literature\n\n\
Evaluate the generated entity as Markdown with YAML frontmatter. Include\n`artifact_id`,\
\ `evaluator`, `evaluated_at`, and a `scores` list. Score\neach criterion on a\
\ 0 to 5 scale where 5 is best.\n\nRequired score names:\n\n- `groundedness` \u2014\
\ does the entity stay anchored to the source chunk,\n with no invented dates,\
\ dollar figures, or quotes?\n- `lesson_clarity` \u2014 for `strategy`, `error`,\
\ `psychological_pattern`,\n and `evidence_bearing_claim` entities, is the operator-level\
\ lesson\n stated crisply enough to be reused in later chapters? For purely\n\
\ factual entities (trader, market, institution, instrument), score\n this on\
\ the clarity of the definition.\n- `historical_context` \u2014 is the entity\
\ placed correctly in the era and\n venue of the source (e.g. early-1900s American\
\ equities) without\n importing modern terminology or instruments?\n- `overgeneralization_risk`\
\ \u2014 is the entity scoped narrowly enough to\n resist becoming a vague universal\
\ claim? Higher score means lower\n risk. Flag entities that quietly claim to\
\ apply to all markets or\n all operators when the source restricts the claim.\n\
\nAdd a short `## Review Notes` section listing any specific lines from\nthe entity\
\ body that drove a low score on any criterion.\n\nEntity artifact: entity/entity-title-market-factor.md\n\
Entity title: Entity Title: Market Factor\n\n## Entity\n\n# Entity Title: Market\
\ Factor\n## Definition\nA market factor is an operator or trader who significantly\
\ influences trading conditions or stock prices within the market. In the text,\
\ a certain trader is identified as a market factor due to his previous successes\
\ in market manipulation.\n## Category\ntrader\n\n"
provider_hint: openrouter
metadata:
output:
path: output/evaluations/{{ input.slug }}.md
kind: generated
artifact_id: generated/evaluation-{{ input.slug }}.md
title: '{{ input.title }} Evaluation'
- stage_id: evaluate-entity
workflow_id: generic-source-evaluations
input_artifact_id: entity/entity-title-bryan-panic-of-96.md
prompt: "# Evaluate Trading-Literature Entity\n\nProfile: trading-literature\n\n\
Evaluate the generated entity as Markdown with YAML frontmatter. Include\n`artifact_id`,\
\ `evaluator`, `evaluated_at`, and a `scores` list. Score\neach criterion on a\
\ 0 to 5 scale where 5 is best.\n\nRequired score names:\n\n- `groundedness` \u2014\
\ does the entity stay anchored to the source chunk,\n with no invented dates,\
\ dollar figures, or quotes?\n- `lesson_clarity` \u2014 for `strategy`, `error`,\
\ `psychological_pattern`,\n and `evidence_bearing_claim` entities, is the operator-level\
\ lesson\n stated crisply enough to be reused in later chapters? For purely\n\
\ factual entities (trader, market, institution, instrument), score\n this on\
\ the clarity of the definition.\n- `historical_context` \u2014 is the entity\
\ placed correctly in the era and\n venue of the source (e.g. early-1900s American\
\ equities) without\n importing modern terminology or instruments?\n- `overgeneralization_risk`\
\ \u2014 is the entity scoped narrowly enough to\n resist becoming a vague universal\
\ claim? Higher score means lower\n risk. Flag entities that quietly claim to\
\ apply to all markets or\n all operators when the source restricts the claim.\n\
\nAdd a short `## Review Notes` section listing any specific lines from\nthe entity\
\ body that drove a low score on any criterion.\n\nEntity artifact: entity/entity-title-bryan-panic-of-96.md\n\
Entity title: Entity Title: Bryan Panic of \u201996\n\n## Entity\n\n# Entity Title:\
\ Bryan Panic of \u201996\n## Definition\nThe Bryan Panic of 1896 was a financial\
\ crisis characterized by significant volatility and manipulation in the markets,\
\ leading to widespread impact on traders, including those in bucket shops.\n\
## Category\nevent\n\n"
provider_hint: openrouter
metadata:
output:
path: output/evaluations/{{ input.slug }}.md
kind: generated
artifact_id: generated/evaluation-{{ input.slug }}.md
title: '{{ input.title }} Evaluation'
- stage_id: evaluate-entity
workflow_id: generic-source-evaluations
input_artifact_id: entity/entity-title-short-position.md
prompt: "# Evaluate Trading-Literature Entity\n\nProfile: trading-literature\n\n\
Evaluate the generated entity as Markdown with YAML frontmatter. Include\n`artifact_id`,\
\ `evaluator`, `evaluated_at`, and a `scores` list. Score\neach criterion on a\
\ 0 to 5 scale where 5 is best.\n\nRequired score names:\n\n- `groundedness` \u2014\
\ does the entity stay anchored to the source chunk,\n with no invented dates,\
\ dollar figures, or quotes?\n- `lesson_clarity` \u2014 for `strategy`, `error`,\
\ `psychological_pattern`,\n and `evidence_bearing_claim` entities, is the operator-level\
\ lesson\n stated crisply enough to be reused in later chapters? For purely\n\
\ factual entities (trader, market, institution, instrument), score\n this on\
\ the clarity of the definition.\n- `historical_context` \u2014 is the entity\
\ placed correctly in the era and\n venue of the source (e.g. early-1900s American\
\ equities) without\n importing modern terminology or instruments?\n- `overgeneralization_risk`\
\ \u2014 is the entity scoped narrowly enough to\n resist becoming a vague universal\
\ claim? Higher score means lower\n risk. Flag entities that quietly claim to\
\ apply to all markets or\n all operators when the source restricts the claim.\n\
\nAdd a short `## Review Notes` section listing any specific lines from\nthe entity\
\ body that drove a low score on any criterion.\n\nEntity artifact: entity/entity-title-short-position.md\n\
Entity title: Entity Title: Short Position\n\n## Entity\n\n# Entity Title: Short\
\ Position\n## Definition\nA short position refers to the practice of selling\
\ stocks that a trader does not own, with the intention of buying them back at\
\ a lower price to profit from the decline. It was a significant factor in the\
\ losses suffered by the traders in the context.\n## Category\nstrategy\n\n"
provider_hint: openrouter
metadata:
output:
path: output/evaluations/{{ input.slug }}.md
kind: generated
artifact_id: generated/evaluation-{{ input.slug }}.md
title: '{{ input.title }} Evaluation'
- stage_id: evaluate-entity
workflow_id: generic-source-evaluations
input_artifact_id: entity/entity-title-bull-tips.md
prompt: "# Evaluate Trading-Literature Entity\n\nProfile: trading-literature\n\n\
Evaluate the generated entity as Markdown with YAML frontmatter. Include\n`artifact_id`,\
\ `evaluator`, `evaluated_at`, and a `scores` list. Score\neach criterion on a\
\ 0 to 5 scale where 5 is best.\n\nRequired score names:\n\n- `groundedness` \u2014\
\ does the entity stay anchored to the source chunk,\n with no invented dates,\
\ dollar figures, or quotes?\n- `lesson_clarity` \u2014 for `strategy`, `error`,\
\ `psychological_pattern`,\n and `evidence_bearing_claim` entities, is the operator-level\
\ lesson\n stated crisply enough to be reused in later chapters? For purely\n\
\ factual entities (trader, market, institution, instrument), score\n this on\
\ the clarity of the definition.\n- `historical_context` \u2014 is the entity\
\ placed correctly in the era and\n venue of the source (e.g. early-1900s American\
\ equities) without\n importing modern terminology or instruments?\n- `overgeneralization_risk`\
\ \u2014 is the entity scoped narrowly enough to\n resist becoming a vague universal\
\ claim? Higher score means lower\n risk. Flag entities that quietly claim to\
\ apply to all markets or\n all operators when the source restricts the claim.\n\
\nAdd a short `## Review Notes` section listing any specific lines from\nthe entity\
\ body that drove a low score on any criterion.\n\nEntity artifact: entity/entity-title-bull-tips.md\n\
Entity title: Entity Title: Bull Tips\n\n## Entity\n\n# Entity Title: Bull Tips\n\
## Definition\nBull tips are recommendations or information suggesting that a\
\ stock's price will rise, encouraging traders to buy. These were used strategically\
\ to influence market movements in the discussed scenario.\n## Category\nevidence_bearing_claim\n\
\n"
provider_hint: openrouter
metadata:
output:
path: output/evaluations/{{ input.slug }}.md
kind: generated
artifact_id: generated/evaluation-{{ input.slug }}.md
title: '{{ input.title }} Evaluation'
recorded_at: '2026-05-18T23:17:34.947476+00:00'