generated from coulomb/repo-seed
feat(P3): IHF Phase 3 complete — Governance and Decision Linkage
Implements the full governance layer: - Schema: requirements, decision_records, policy_references, implementation_change_references; requirement_candidates gets requirement_id back-reference - RequirementsController (index/show; promotion-only create) - DecisionRecordsController (CRUD + policy/impl ref management) - GovernanceDashboardAction on HubsController (AutoRefresh) - PromoteToRequirementAction + LinkToDecisionAction on candidates - Outcome immutability enforced at controller level (fill excludes outcome) - Full six-outcome vocabulary with Tailwind color roles - Integration tests for all Phase 3 paths - FrontController: registers Phase 2 missing controllers + all Phase 3 - SCOPE.md + docs/phase3-summary.md updated Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
8
SCOPE.md
8
SCOPE.md
@@ -65,9 +65,9 @@ IHF treats every meaningful UI element as a **governed interaction artifact** ra
|
||||
|
||||
## Current State
|
||||
|
||||
- Status: Phase 2 complete — structured feedback and triage implemented
|
||||
- Implementation: Phase 0 complete (specification); Phase 1 complete (widget registry, event capture, annotations, hub dashboard, auth); Phase 2 complete (annotation severity, annotation threads, requirement candidates, triage lifecycle, reviewer assignment, triage dashboard)
|
||||
- Stability: core artifact model and schema are stable; Phase 2 data model (RequirementCandidate, TriageState, ReviewerAssignment) is additive and stable
|
||||
- Status: Phase 3 complete — governance and decision linkage implemented
|
||||
- Implementation: Phase 0 complete (specification); Phase 1 complete (widget registry, event capture, annotations, hub dashboard, auth); Phase 2 complete (annotation severity, annotation threads, requirement candidates, triage lifecycle, reviewer assignment, triage dashboard); Phase 3 complete (requirement promotion, decision records, policy references, implementation change references, governance audit trail dashboard)
|
||||
- Stability: core artifact model and schema are stable; Phase 3 data model (Requirement, DecisionRecord, PolicyReference, ImplementationChangeReference) is additive and stable
|
||||
- Usage: reference implementation running on IHP v1.5 + PostgreSQL; `devenv up` to start
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
@@ -125,4 +125,4 @@ keywords: [spec, artifact, traceability, widget, decision, outcome]
|
||||
|
||||
## Notes
|
||||
|
||||
Phase 0 (specification), Phase 1 (Minimal Interaction Core), and Phase 2 (Structured Feedback and Triage) are complete. Phase 3 target: Decision Records — linking accepted RequirementCandidates to governed decision records and implementation changes. The spec is intentionally broader than the first implementation — IHP is the reference technology for Phases 1–2, but the framework is designed to survive UI technology changes (§12.7, §Phase 6).
|
||||
Phase 0 (specification), Phase 1 (Minimal Interaction Core), Phase 2 (Structured Feedback and Triage), and Phase 3 (Governance and Decision Linkage) are complete. Phase 4 target: Outcome Signals — DeploymentRecord, ObservedOutcome, and automated gap detection closing the traceability chain. The spec is intentionally broader than the first three implementations — IHP is the reference technology for Phases 1–3, but the framework is designed to survive UI technology changes (§12.7, §Phase 6).
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user