Draft capability entry (reuse-surface REUSE-WP-0017-T04, cohort 1)

Honest first-pass maturity vector grounded in README/docs/tests present
in this repo; no invented evidence. Flagged for human review before
publish. See reuse-surface history/2026-07-06-coverage-classification.md.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

registry/capabilities/capability.infotech.interaction-hub-framework.md

@@ -0,0 +1,129 @@
+---
+id: capability.infotech.interaction-hub-framework
+name: Interaction Hub Framework (IHF)
+summary: Specification and reference implementation of a governed, observable interaction substrate connecting
+  rendered UI widgets to structured feedback, requirements, decisions, implementation changes, and observed
+  outcomes.
+owner: inter-hub
+status: draft
+domain: infotech
+tags:
+- interaction
+- governance
+- ihp
+- haskell
+maturity:
+  discovery:
+    current: D3
+    target: D5
+    confidence: medium
+    rationale: 'SCOPE.md documents the full traceability chain (widget -> interaction -> feedback -> requirement
+      -> decision -> implementation -> outcome) with explicit in-scope/out-of-scope lists; specs/ and
+      contracts/ dirs back this up. Note: README.md is a stale repo-seed template leftover, not representative
+      — SCOPE.md is authoritative.'
+  availability:
+    current: A1
+    target: A3
+    confidence: low
+    rationale: Haskell/IHP application (App.cabal, Main.hs, Web/Application dirs) with a `.gitea/workflows/deploy.yaml`;
+      runnable/deployable but availability confidence is low pending direct verification of a working
+      build in this sweep.
+external_evidence:
+  completeness:
+    level: C1
+    confidence: low
+    basis: scope_vs_intent_and_consumer_expectations
+    satisfied_expectations:
+    - widget identity/lifecycle governance scope documented
+    - interaction event capture and annotation scope documented
+    broken_expectations: []
+    out_of_scope_expectations: []
+  reliability:
+    level: R0
+    confidence: low
+    basis: consumer_quality_signals
+    known_reliability_risks:
+    - README.md is stale/misleading (leftover repo-seed template text) — needs fixing regardless of registry
+      status
+    - availability not independently verified (build not run during this sweep)
+discovery:
+  intent: 'Make UI interaction observable and governable: connect every meaningful widget to structured
+    feedback, distilled requirements, governance decisions, and observed post-change outcomes.'
+  includes:
+  - widget identity, lifecycle governance, semantic addressability
+  - interaction event capture and contextual enrichment
+  - annotation/structured comment threads
+  - requirements distillation and governance ledger
+  - outcome observation
+  excludes:
+  - hub-specific business domain concepts outside the interaction-governance substrate
+  assumptions: []
+  use_cases: []
+  research_memos: []
+availability:
+  current_level: A1
+  target_level: A3
+  current_artifacts:
+  - Haskell/IHP application
+  target_artifacts: []
+  consumption_modes:
+  - application
+relations:
+  depends_on: []
+  supports: []
+  related_to: []
+evidence:
+  documentation:
+  - SCOPE.md
+  - specs/
+  - contracts/
+  tests:
+  - Test/
+  consumer_feedback: []
+  bug_reports: []
+  incidents: []
+consumer_guidance:
+  recommended_for:
+  - hub-based systems wanting governed, traceable UI interaction
+  not_recommended_for:
+  - consumers needing a stable published API today (not yet independently verified in this sweep)
+  known_limitations:
+  - README.md needs fixing (stale repo-seed leftover text); availability not independently build-verified
+    this sweep
+promotion_history: []
+---
+
+# Interaction Hub Framework (IHF)
+
+## Overview
+
+`inter-hub` specifies and implements the Interaction Hub Framework (IHF): every meaningful UI widget becomes a governed interaction artifact with a full traceability chain from rendered widget through user interaction, structured feedback, requirement distillation, governance decision, implementation change, to observed outcome.
+
+## Assessment notes
+
+### Discovery
+
+SCOPE.md documents the full traceability chain (widget -> interaction -> feedback -> requirement -> decision -> implementation -> outcome) with explicit in-scope/out-of-scope lists; specs/ and contracts/ dirs back this up. Note: README.md is a stale repo-seed template leftover, not representative — SCOPE.md is authoritative.
+
+### Availability
+
+Haskell/IHP application (App.cabal, Main.hs, Web/Application dirs) with a `.gitea/workflows/deploy.yaml`; runnable/deployable but availability confidence is low pending direct verification of a working build in this sweep.
+
+### Completeness
+
+First-pass honest assessment from the REUSE-WP-0017 coverage campaign
+(reuse-surface). No external consumer feedback exists yet; levels reflect
+scope-vs-intent documentation quality, not internal code quality.
+
+### Reliability
+
+No production consumer telemetry exists yet; reliability level is
+intentionally conservative pending REUSE-WP-0019 reuse-telemetry evidence.
+
+## Promotion checklist
+
+- [x] ID follows `capability.<domain>.<name>` pattern
+- [x] Maturity enums match `specs/CapabilityMaturityStandard.md`
+- [x] `external_evidence` is populated separately from `maturity`
+- [ ] Relations reference valid capability IDs (none yet)
+- [x] Index entry added in `registry/indexes/capabilities.yaml`