Added project documentation in wiki and established INTENT.md

wiki/IdempotentCompounding.md

@@ -0,0 +1,112 @@
+IdempotentCompounding
+
+*Kaizen Agentic Philosophy*
+
+# IdempotentCompounding — a primer
+
+Definition (one-liner): Build and evolve systems by idempotent automation (safe to run repeatedly) and compounding increments (small units that add durable value), governed by outcomes and quality gates.
+
+## Core principles
+
+- Idempotence by default — Every operation (provision, deploy, migrate, refactor) is safe to re-run; desired state > imperative steps.
+- Compound value, not complexity — Ship small, composable capability units that stack cleanly and raise the baseline.
+- Evidence over intention — Each increment must declare its value metric and show before/after.
+- Reversibility — Fast rollback/roll-forward; changes are sliceable and isolated.
+- Sustainability as a constraint — Optimize for maintainability, cost, energy, and human time.
+- Quality is automated — Tests, checks, and drift detection run continuously, not occasionally.
+- Documentation is generated — Architecture, runbooks, and changelogs are derived from code & traces, then curated.
+
+## The operating cycle (repeatable)
+
+Select → Specify → Safeguard → Apply → Verify → Record
+
+- Select a high-ROI increment (hotspot × business value).
+- Specify desired state (declarative spec, schema, or refactor objective).
+- Safeguard with idempotent checks: contract tests, drift monitors, health probes.
+- Apply via automation (IaC, pipelines, codemods) — re-runnable end-to-end.
+- Verify outcomes (SLOs, cost, complexity, security).
+- Record: update arc42 views, ADR, and the quality dashboard.
+
+Rule of thumb: if you’re afraid to re-run it, it’s not IdempotentCompounding yet.
+
+## Units of change (the “compounders”)
+
+- Infra Module (e.g., Terraform/Kubernetes object)
+- Service Capability (feature flag, API slice)
+- Quality Guide Move (codemod + lint rule)
+- Data Contract (schema + migration + validation)
+- Ops Control (SLO, alert, autoscaler policy)
+
+Each unit carries:
+- Spec (YAML/DSL + schema)
+- Guards (tests/checks)
+- KPIs (value metric)
+- Rollbacks (delete/replace plan)
+- Docs hooks (arc42/ADR update hints)
+
+## Minimal guardrails
+
+- Idempotence test: run the job twice; expect no diff.
+- Blast-radius cap: feature flags, canaries, or scoped namespaces.
+- Drift sentry: reconcile loop or plan delta must be ≈0 after apply.
+- Budget bound: change must not breach cost/latency/error-rate budgets.
+- Timebox: if verification can’t prove value in X hours, revert or park.
+
+## Metrics that matter
+
+- Value: SLO attainment, cycle time, revenue/usage lift, defect escape rate ↓
+- Quality: Maintainability index ↑, complexity/duplication ↓, DoC compliance %
+- Sustainability: € per request ↓, watts per request ↓, toil hours ↓
+- Reliability: MTTR ↓, change failure rate ↓, successful re-runs % = 100
+
+## Tooling patterns (typical stack)
+
+- Desired state: Terraform/Pulumi, Helm/Kustomize, GitOps (Argo CD/Flux)
+- Idempotent app changes: migration frameworks, codemods (libCST/jscodeshift), OpenRewrite
+- Verification: contract & golden tests; load tests in CI for hot paths
+- Observability: traces/metrics feeding fitness functions in pipelines
+- Docs: Structurizr/PlantUML generated from code + traces; ADRs as code
+
+How it fits the AbcdekGuidance Practice
+
+A — Architecture (ArcFortyTwo): auto-generate views; define fitness functions (what “value” means).
+B — Build (SafetyNetTests): make verification idempotent; contract tests become guards.
+C — Clean (CleanByDefinition): encode idempotence rules (no side-effect scripts, reversible migrations).
+D — Direction (GamePlan): prioritize compounders with best value/effort ratio.
+E — Evolve (RefactoringLoop): codemods + tests prove idempotent repeats and measurable deltas.
+K — KeepClean (Kaizen): weekly trend checks; drift/DoC gates keep compounded value from decaying.
+
+Templates (drop-in)
+
+1) Value Ticket (per increment)
+
+Title: <Increment name>
+Desired State: <declarative spec or target structure>
+Guards: <tests/checks to pass; idempotence proof: re-run yields no diff>
+Value Metric: <name, baseline, target, window>
+Rollback: <how to undo safely>
+Docs Hooks: <arc42 sections / ADR to update>
+Owner / ETA:
+
+2) Idempotence Checklist
+
+[ ] Declarative spec exists
+[ ] Dry-run/plan produces stable diff
+[ ] Double-apply yields zero change
+[ ] Safe to parallelize or properly serialized
+[ ] Idempotent cleanup (delete/apply symmetry)
+
+## Example (brief)
+
+- Goal: Reduce p95 latency by 20% on /checkout.
+- Compounder: Add Redis read-through cache for product lookups (Helm values + code toggle).
+- Guards: Contract tests for /checkout; load test at 95th percentile; drift check on Helm release.
+- Apply: helm upgrade (safe to re-run), feature flag rollout 10%→100%.
+- Verify: p95 from 480 ms → 360 ms (7-day window), error rate unchanged.
+- Record: ADR-012, arc42 runtime view updated, dashboard shows value trend.
+
+## Bottom line 
+IdempotentCompounding turns improvement into a safe, repeatable habit: every step is re-runnable, every change compounds value, and every gain is proven.
+
+
+xxx