Added project documentation in wiki and established INTENT.md
This commit is contained in:
79
wiki/RevenueModel.md
Normal file
79
wiki/RevenueModel.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
|
||||
RevenueModel
|
||||
|
||||
*Monetization concept*
|
||||
|
||||
# KaizenAgentic Revenue Model
|
||||
|
||||
How KaizenAgentic captures value on top of the raw token costs for LLM providers.
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Cost Basis
|
||||
|
||||
* **C** = token price of underlying model (e.g. GPT-4o, Claude 3, etc.).
|
||||
* This is the *direct variable cost* passed through from the model vendor.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Markup via Capability Multipliers
|
||||
|
||||
* KaizenAgentic defines capability tiers (2x–5x).
|
||||
* **Markup = Capability Multiplier – 1**
|
||||
|
||||
* Example: 3x agent = 200% markup over base cost.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Gross Margin Structure
|
||||
|
||||
| **Tier** | **Customer Price** | **Vendor Cost** | **KaizenAgentic Revenue (Gross Margin)** |
|
||||
| -------- | ------------------ | --------------- | ---------------------------------------- |
|
||||
| 2x Agent | 2C | C | C (50% margin) |
|
||||
| 3x Agent | 3C | C | 2C (66% margin) |
|
||||
| 4x Agent | 4C | C | 3C (75% margin) |
|
||||
| 5x Agent | 5C | C | 4C (80% margin) |
|
||||
|
||||
Margins increase with capability tier → incentivizing customers to upgrade.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Additional Revenue Streams
|
||||
|
||||
Beyond token usage markups:
|
||||
|
||||
* **Subscription Access** (recurring):
|
||||
|
||||
* Pro Tier (monthly): access to 2x–3x agents + monitoring dashboards.
|
||||
* Enterprise Tier (monthly/annual): 4x–5x agents + SLAs + private optimization loops.
|
||||
* **Professional Services**: Custom agent design, integration with developer workflows, consulting.
|
||||
* **Data Insights**: Aggregated anonymized performance benchmarks offered as an add-on (optional).
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Example Economics
|
||||
|
||||
Assume:
|
||||
|
||||
* GPT-4o cost = $0.01 / 1K tokens
|
||||
|
||||
* Customer runs 10M tokens / month with a 4x Agent
|
||||
|
||||
* **Customer Price** = $0.04 × 10M = **$400**
|
||||
|
||||
* **Vendor Cost** = $0.01 × 10M = **$100**
|
||||
|
||||
* **Revenue (Gross Margin)** = **$300 (75%)**
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### 6. Business Model Summary
|
||||
|
||||
* **Transparent:** Customers always see pricing tied to base model cost.
|
||||
* **Scalable:** More usage → more revenue, with healthy margins.
|
||||
* **Tiered Value Capture:** Higher-capability agents capture proportionally more margin.
|
||||
* **Recurring Layer:** Subscriptions and enterprise add-ons stabilize revenue beyond token usage.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
👉 This makes KaizenAgentic operate like a **“talent agency margin model”**: you pay the “raw salary” (token cost to the model vendor), and KaizenAgentic earns its cut (markup × value of coaching/optimization).
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
xxx
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user