chore: add workplans WP-0004, WP-0005, WP-0006

WP-0004: Stable Documentation Corpus & Architecture Records
WP-0005: Diagram Renderer Integration
WP-0006: Packaging & Distribution

State-hub workstreams and tasks created; local_path registration deferred
pending path mismatch fix.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
2026-03-16 12:55:34 +00:00
parent 531af57f4d
commit 039420caee
3 changed files with 546 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,190 @@
---
id: MRKD-WP-0004
type: workplan
domain: markitect
repo: marki-docx
status: active
state_hub_workstream_id: 91d06c92-caa8-42fc-b6d4-82340f1bed4f
created: 2026-03-16
updated: 2026-03-16
---
# MRKD-WP-0004 — Stable Documentation Corpus & Architecture Records
Fulfil FR-1101 by establishing the markidocx product documentation itself as a real,
managed markidocx project. The specs (PRD, FRS, UCC) become a live round-trip corpus
that the `release-regression` workflow runs against on every release. This workstream
also writes the two deferred architecture decision records and generates the first SBOM.
**Scope:** FR-11011110 (stable corpus & self-test), ADR-002, ADR-003, SBOM
**Out of scope:** diagram rendering, packaging, CI/CD — addressed in WP-0005/0006
**Depends on:** MRKD-WP-0001, MRKD-WP-0002, MRKD-WP-0003 — all complete
---
## T01 — Set up specs as real markidocx project manifest
```task
id: MRKD-WP-0004-T01
status: todo
priority: high
state_hub_task_id: f1a36613-ceaa-4786-ac39-cd3a7fd1c142
```
Create a manifest file that treats the markidocx product documentation as a live
markidocx project. This makes the specs the stable corpus for regression testing
as required by FR-1101.
- Create `corpus/markidocx-docs/manifest.yaml`:
- `project.name: markidocx-docs`
- `project.feature_level: level1`
- `project.family: article`
- `sources`: PRD, FRS v0.2, UCC (relative paths into `specs/`)
- `output.dir: corpus/markidocx-docs/dist`
- Run `markidocx validate corpus/markidocx-docs/manifest.yaml` — must exit 0
- Run `markidocx build corpus/markidocx-docs/manifest.yaml` — must produce valid DOCX
- Run `markidocx import` + `markidocx compare` — must report clean or expected drift only
- Document any structural drift in `corpus/markidocx-docs/known-drift.md`
Deliverable: `markidocx build corpus/markidocx-docs/manifest.yaml` succeeds; a DOCX
of the product documentation exists in `corpus/markidocx-docs/dist/`.
---
## T02 — Wire release-regression workflow against specs corpus
```task
id: MRKD-WP-0004-T02
status: todo
priority: high
state_hub_task_id: f17e959f-28da-4386-9004-b5e036054b06
```
Connect the `release-regression` composite workflow to the real documentation corpus
so that `markidocx workflow release-regression corpus/markidocx-docs/manifest.yaml`
runs a full build → import → compare cycle and records evidence (FR-1102, FR-1103,
FR-1106, FR-1107).
- Update `workflows.py` `release-regression` handler to accept a manifest path argument;
default to the corpus manifest when none supplied
- Run the workflow; assert the evidence set contains build, import, and drift reports
- Add `tests/regression/test_corpus_regression.py`:
- Invokes `release-regression` on the corpus manifest
- Asserts workflow result is `full` or `with-fallback` (not `failed`)
- Asserts evidence artefacts are present and have correct traceability fields (FR-1110)
- Disclose corpus identity in regression output (FR-1109): include corpus manifest path
and its git HEAD SHA as `corpus_id` in the workflow result
Deliverable: `pytest tests/regression/test_corpus_regression.py` passes; evidence
written to `.markidocx/evidence/` and retrievable via CLI.
---
## T03 — ADR-002: python-docx as conversion engine
```task
id: MRKD-WP-0004-T03
status: todo
priority: medium
state_hub_task_id: bfe2a9fa-25b2-4b4b-b21b-eae457716ce0
```
Write the architecture decision record explaining the choice of python-docx as the
DOCX conversion engine. This was identified as a deferred deliverable during WP-0001.
File: `architecture/ADR-002-python-docx-as-conversion-engine.md`
Cover:
- **Context:** need to produce and consume .docx files from Python; alternatives evaluated
(pandoc subprocess, docx2python, mammoth, python-docx)
- **Decision:** python-docx for both build (write) and import (read)
- **Consequences:** direct paragraph/run model maps cleanly to Markdown structure;
no subprocess dependency; limited to Open XML subset exposed by python-docx API;
complex Word features (track changes, SmartArt) are out of scope by design
- **Alternatives rejected:** pandoc — heavier dependency, harder to control structure;
mammoth — read-only; docx2python — limited write support
Deliverable: `architecture/ADR-002-*.md` present and follows ADR-001 conventions.
---
## T04 — ADR-003: manifest YAML schema
```task
id: MRKD-WP-0004-T04
status: todo
priority: medium
state_hub_task_id: b6de6733-b332-4efc-9e23-82fce205b856
```
Write the architecture decision record documenting the manifest YAML schema design.
File: `architecture/ADR-003-manifest-yaml-schema.md`
Cover:
- **Context:** need a project definition format that is human-writable, version-controlled,
and parseable without a schema registry
- **Decision:** YAML with a fixed top-level structure (`project`, `sources`, `output`,
`metadata`); validated on load via dataclass coercion
- **Schema snapshot:** include the current field definitions as a reference
- **Consequences:** simple for users; no JSON Schema or Pydantic dependency; evolving
the schema requires coordination with manifest.py
- **Alternatives rejected:** TOML (less familiar in doc tooling), JSON (less writable),
a database manifest (over-engineered for single-project use)
Deliverable: `architecture/ADR-003-*.md` present.
---
## T05 — SBOM generation and state-hub registration
```task
id: MRKD-WP-0004-T05
status: todo
priority: medium
state_hub_task_id: 36aecd50-8176-4122-9706-a8697d8f5936
```
Generate and register the first SBOM for marki-docx so the state hub has an accurate
dependency picture.
```bash
cd ~/the-custodian/state-hub
make ingest-sbom REPO=marki-docx SCAN=1 REPO_PATH=/home/tegwick/marki-docx
```
- Verify the SBOM ingestion completes without errors
- Confirm `last_sbom_at` is set for `marki-docx` in the state hub
- Document any licence issues or unexpected transitive dependencies
- Add a note to CLAUDE.md reminding to re-run SBOM after dependency changes
Deliverable: State hub shows `last_sbom_at` set for `marki-docx`; no unresolved
licence issues.
---
## How to Work
- Work through tasks in priority order: T01 → T02 (high), then T03 → T04 → T05 (medium)
- T01 must complete before T02 (T02 depends on the corpus manifest)
- T03 and T04 are independent writing tasks — can be done in any order or in parallel
## Updating Task Status
```
status: todo → status: in_progress (when you start it)
status: in_progress → status: done (when verified complete)
```
When every task is `done`, set the frontmatter `status: done`.
## Success Criteria
Before marking the workplan done:
1. Every task block has `status: done`
2. Workplan frontmatter `status: done`
3. `corpus/markidocx-docs/manifest.yaml` present and builds cleanly
4. `pytest tests/regression/test_corpus_regression.py` passes
5. `architecture/ADR-002-*.md` and `architecture/ADR-003-*.md` present
6. State hub shows `last_sbom_at` set for `marki-docx`