- workplans/MRKD-WP-0001-foundation-level1.md: 8-task workplan for Foundation & LEVEL1 Core (T01 scaffolding through T08 e2e harness) - CLAUDE.md: added Planned Architecture section (interface table, FR domain map, key concepts, round-trip data flow) and Development Commands stubs derived from FRS v0.2 - problems/next-steps-2026-03-14.md: implementation guide for next session — task order, dep list, state-hub task UUIDs, quality gates No code implemented yet; workstream registered in State Hub. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
11 KiB
Below is a PRD for the markidocx product, structured according to your InfoTechPrimer PRD model and respecting the principle of implementation independence (no CLI flags, API routes, or architecture details). Implementation specifics such as CLI/REST/MCP interfaces belong in the FRS, which would normally follow this PRD.
PRD
Product Requirement Document
Product Requirements Document: markidocx
1. Definition
markidocx is a product that enables reliable round-trip editing between Markdown and Microsoft Word documents while preserving document structure and semantic intent.
The product addresses a recurring coordination problem in technical documentation and knowledge workflows: Markdown is widely used for structured authoring and version-controlled collaboration, while Word remains the dominant format for editorial review, stakeholder collaboration, and formal document exchange.
markidocx provides a controlled workflow in which:
- Markdown remains the canonical structured source
- Word serves as a managed editorial interface
- repeated conversion cycles preserve semantic structure
- template-driven styling separates presentation from content
- large multi-file documents remain manageable across the editing lifecycle
The product is intended for organizations that require structured documentation workflows with Word-based collaboration, including engineering teams, documentation teams, standards bodies, and regulated environments.
2. Context
markidocx operates at the intersection of:
- technical documentation systems
- collaborative editorial workflows
- requirements and specification authoring
- knowledge management infrastructures
In many modern documentation environments:
- engineers and technical authors write in Markdown
- documents are stored in version-controlled repositories
- external stakeholders and reviewers operate primarily in Word
This mismatch creates friction:
- Word-based edits often break structured content
- Markdown workflows are inaccessible to non-technical reviewers
- conversion pipelines introduce structural drift
markidocx exists to bridge these environments by establishing a controlled round-trip workflow where:
- Markdown remains structurally authoritative
- Word editing is supported within a defined semantic envelope
- conversion processes are deterministic and inspectable
The product acts as a boundary system between structured authoring and editorial collaboration.
3. Core Concepts
Round-Trip Editing
Round-trip editing is the ability to export a document into another format for editing and later re-import the modified document while preserving structural meaning.
markidocx establishes a disciplined round-trip process between Markdown and Word.
Canonical Source Model
The canonical source of truth is Markdown structured documents.
Word documents generated by the system are considered editorial projections of the canonical source rather than independent authoritative artifacts.
Semantic Preservation
The product guarantees preservation of document semantics across editing cycles within defined feature levels.
Preserved semantics include structural constructs such as headings, lists, references, and citations.
Template-Driven Presentation
Document presentation is controlled by document templates and style definitions.
This allows the same content to be exported in different presentation forms without modifying the source.
Built-in document families include:
- article
- book
- website
Multi-File Document Composition
Large documents are often structured across multiple files for maintainability.
markidocx supports multi-file composition and ensures that editing cycles do not collapse this structure unnecessarily.
Feature Levels
markidocx distinguishes between two functional feature tiers:
LEVEL1 – Core Document Structure
- headings
- lists
- tables
- footnotes
- images
- links
LEVEL3 – Advanced Scholarly / Technical Features
- cross references
- numbered figures
- automatic diagrams
- bibliography
Feature levels define the guarantees the system provides during round-trip editing.
Drift Detection
Structural drift may occur when editing documents in Word.
markidocx introduces mechanisms to detect and report semantic differences between:
- original Markdown sources
- re-imported Markdown versions
This allows users to understand and manage structural changes.
4. Scope and Non-Scope
In Scope
The product must support:
- Markdown ↔ Word round-trip editing
- multi-file document composition
- template-based document styling
- two defined feature levels (LEVEL1 and LEVEL3)
- preservation of document structure across editing cycles
- detection and reporting of semantic drift
- support for editorial collaboration workflows
- extensibility through additional document templates and styles
- automated testing of round-trip behavior using product documentation
The product must provide interfaces that enable:
- local document workflows
- automated integration into documentation pipelines
- programmatic interaction through service interfaces
Out of Scope
The product does not attempt to:
- replace word processors
- provide a graphical document editor
- support arbitrary Word document constructs
- act as a full document layout system
- enforce a specific documentation methodology
- replace existing publishing systems
markidocx focuses specifically on structured round-trip workflows, not full document production ecosystems.
5. Practical Implications
Adopting markidocx introduces a structured approach to document collaboration.
Benefits include:
- improved collaboration between technical and non-technical stakeholders
- preservation of structured documentation in version-controlled environments
- reduced manual cleanup after Word-based reviews
- deterministic document generation workflows
- improved traceability between authored content and reviewed documents
Trade-offs include:
- the need to operate within supported feature boundaries
- the requirement to use defined templates and styles
- occasional limitations when importing highly customized Word content
The system is particularly valuable for organizations that:
- maintain long-lived technical documentation
- operate cross-disciplinary teams
- require traceable document evolution
- manage complex specifications or manuals
6. Product Use Cases
The product must support the following key use cases.
Technical Review Workflow
A document written in Markdown is exported to Word for review by stakeholders and later re-imported with edits incorporated into the Markdown source.
Multi-Chapter Document Editing
A large multi-file document is exported as a single Word document for external review and later re-imported without collapsing the source structure.
Specification Publishing
A technical specification written in Markdown is exported using a formal template suitable for distribution and archival.
Documentation Collaboration
Technical authors maintain Markdown sources while subject matter experts provide editorial feedback using Word.
Knowledge System Integration
The product integrates with documentation pipelines, knowledge repositories, or automated publication workflows.
Regression Testing of Documentation
The product documentation itself serves as a round-trip editing test corpus, validating product functionality across releases.
7. Constraints and Assumptions
Constraints
- Word document editing environments vary widely.
- Markdown dialects differ across ecosystems.
- Some Word features cannot be reliably mapped to Markdown.
- Diagram and bibliography rendering depend on external tools.
The product must therefore operate within defined semantic boundaries.
Assumptions
- Markdown remains the authoritative authoring format.
- Word is used primarily for editing and review rather than canonical storage.
- document structure is maintained using supported constructs.
- editorial users operate within template-defined formatting environments.
8. Success Criteria
markidocx is considered successful when it achieves the following outcomes.
Structural Stability
Repeated Markdown → Word → Markdown cycles preserve document structure within supported feature levels.
Editorial Accessibility
Non-technical stakeholders can review and edit documents without interacting directly with Markdown sources.
Template Flexibility
Organizations can apply different document presentation styles without altering content.
Multi-Document Scalability
Large documents composed from multiple files remain manageable across editing cycles.
Detectable Drift
Structural changes introduced during editing are visible and analyzable.
Pipeline Compatibility
The product integrates into automated documentation and publishing pipelines.
Testable Documentation
The product documentation itself can be used as a stable end-to-end validation corpus.
9. Dependencies
The product depends on:
- document conversion technologies capable of translating between Markdown and Word formats
- diagram rendering tools for automated diagrams
- citation and bibliography processing tools
- structured document templates
- consistent Markdown dialect support
External dependencies must be manageable without introducing excessive operational complexity.
10. Risks
Semantic Drift Risk
Editing in Word may unintentionally alter document structure.
Template Misuse
Users may modify templates in ways that break round-trip guarantees.
Over-complex Feature Expectations
Users may expect support for all Word features, which is not feasible.
Workflow Discipline
Successful operation depends on maintaining structured authoring practices.
11. Related Concepts
- Markdown Documentation Systems
- Structured Authoring
- Technical Writing Pipelines
- Documentation-as-Code
- Word Editorial Workflows
- Publishing Toolchains
- Knowledge Repositories
Adjacent artifacts include:
- Functional Requirements Specification (FRS)
- Architecture Documentation
- Technical Specifications
- Template and Style Definitions
- Round-Trip Validation Reports
12. Appendix: Product Positioning
markidocx belongs to a class of tools that bridge structured authoring and editorial collaboration.
Compared with typical Markdown toolchains, the product focuses specifically on controlled editorial round-trip workflows rather than pure publishing.
Compared with office-based authoring systems, the product preserves version-controlled structured sources.
Its value lies in enabling structured documentation ecosystems that remain compatible with Word-centric collaboration environments.
xxx