---
entity_slug: retainers_and_dependents_system
evaluator: null
evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T06:18:10.672135'
overall_score: 4.2
scores:
- name: definition_precision
  value: 4.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: The definition clearly distinguishes this system from market-based relationships
    by focusing on direct subsistence provision and obligation structures. It precisely
    captures the mechanism of surplus consumption through maintaining dependents rather
    than through exchange.
- name: source_grounding
  value: 5.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: This entity is directly grounded in Smith's analysis in Book III, Chapter
    4, where he explicitly describes how great proprietors maintained retainers and
    dependents because they lacked commercial outlets for their surplus produce. The
    concept faithfully represents Smith's historical account of pre-commercial social
    organization.
- name: domain_placement
  value: 4.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: Placement in "Distribution" is appropriate since this system fundamentally
    concerns how agricultural surplus is allocated between landowners and their dependents.
    While it has governance aspects, the core mechanism is distributive rather than
    purely political.
- name: vsm_relevance
  value: 3.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: This maps reasonably well to S1 (primary operations) as a basic social-economic
    operating system, and has S5 (identity/policy) elements in terms of social structure
    and power relations. However, it represents a complete alternative to market systems
    rather than fitting neatly within VSM categories designed for organizational analysis.
- name: explanatory_value
  value: 5.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: This entity provides crucial explanatory power for understanding Smith's
    historical analysis of how societies transition from feudal to commercial systems.
    It illuminates the structural mechanism that created feudal power relations and
    explains why commercial development dissolved these dependencies.
---

# Evaluation: Retainers And Dependents System

## definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0

The definition clearly distinguishes this system from market-based relationships by focusing on direct subsistence provision and obligation structures. It precisely captures the mechanism of surplus consumption through maintaining dependents rather than through exchange.

## source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0

This entity is directly grounded in Smith's analysis in Book III, Chapter 4, where he explicitly describes how great proprietors maintained retainers and dependents because they lacked commercial outlets for their surplus produce. The concept faithfully represents Smith's historical account of pre-commercial social organization.

## domain_placement — 4.0 / 5.0

Placement in "Distribution" is appropriate since this system fundamentally concerns how agricultural surplus is allocated between landowners and their dependents. While it has governance aspects, the core mechanism is distributive rather than purely political.

## vsm_relevance — 3.0 / 5.0

This maps reasonably well to S1 (primary operations) as a basic social-economic operating system, and has S5 (identity/policy) elements in terms of social structure and power relations. However, it represents a complete alternative to market systems rather than fitting neatly within VSM categories designed for organizational analysis.

## explanatory_value — 5.0 / 5.0

This entity provides crucial explanatory power for understanding Smith's historical analysis of how societies transition from feudal to commercial systems. It illuminates the structural mechanism that created feudal power relations and explains why commercial development dissolved these dependencies.
