---
entity_slug: economic_system_theory
evaluator: null
evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T05:21:29.057412'
overall_score: 2.0
scores:
- name: definition_precision
  value: 2.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: The definition is overly broad and circular, essentially defining "economic
    system theory" as "theory about economic systems." It lacks specificity about
    what distinguishes this particular theoretical framework from general economic
    analysis or methodology.
- name: source_grounding
  value: 2.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: While Smith does discuss political economy as a science, the entity extrapolates
    this into a comprehensive "systematic body of principles" that goes well beyond
    what Smith explicitly articulates. The source reference to "Book IV, Chapter 0"
    is also problematic as Book IV doesn't have a Chapter 0.
- name: domain_placement
  value: 3.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: '"General Theory" is an appropriate domain for this type of meta-theoretical
    concept, though the entity might be better categorized under methodology or analytical
    frameworks rather than as a standalone theoretical construct.'
- name: vsm_relevance
  value: 1.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: This entity is far too abstract and meta-theoretical to map meaningfully
    to any specific VSM system. It represents a conceptual umbrella rather than a
    functional component that could operate within a viable system structure.
- name: explanatory_value
  value: 2.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: The entity adds little explanatory power beyond labeling Smith's theoretical
    approach. It doesn't illuminate specific mechanisms, relationships, or structural
    elements that would enhance understanding of how economic systems actually function
    or develop.
---

# Evaluation: Economic System Theory

## definition_precision — 2.0 / 5.0

The definition is overly broad and circular, essentially defining "economic system theory" as "theory about economic systems." It lacks specificity about what distinguishes this particular theoretical framework from general economic analysis or methodology.

## source_grounding — 2.0 / 5.0

While Smith does discuss political economy as a science, the entity extrapolates this into a comprehensive "systematic body of principles" that goes well beyond what Smith explicitly articulates. The source reference to "Book IV, Chapter 0" is also problematic as Book IV doesn't have a Chapter 0.

## domain_placement — 3.0 / 5.0

"General Theory" is an appropriate domain for this type of meta-theoretical concept, though the entity might be better categorized under methodology or analytical frameworks rather than as a standalone theoretical construct.

## vsm_relevance — 1.0 / 5.0

This entity is far too abstract and meta-theoretical to map meaningfully to any specific VSM system. It represents a conceptual umbrella rather than a functional component that could operate within a viable system structure.

## explanatory_value — 2.0 / 5.0

The entity adds little explanatory power beyond labeling Smith's theoretical approach. It doesn't illuminate specific mechanisms, relationships, or structural elements that would enhance understanding of how economic systems actually function or develop.
