---
entity_slug: prodigals
evaluator: null
evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T06:09:32.378677'
overall_score: 4.0
scores:
- name: definition_precision
  value: 4.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: The definition clearly distinguishes prodigals as economic actors who
    dissipate capital through unproductive consumption, contrasting them with productive
    borrowers. The concept is well-bounded and avoids circularity by defining the
    behavior (unproductive consumption of borrowed funds) rather than just restating
    the term.
- name: source_grounding
  value: 5.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: This entity is directly grounded in Smith's text from Book II, Chapter
    4, where he explicitly discusses prodigals as a category of borrowers who waste
    capital. Smith uses this term and concept extensively to illustrate harmful economic
    behavior that destroys rather than creates value.
- name: domain_placement
  value: 5.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: The placement in "Consumption" domain is precisely correct, as prodigals
    are defined by their consumption patterns rather than production or investment
    activities. This distinguishes them from other economic actors and aligns with
    Smith's analysis of different types of economic behavior.
- name: vsm_relevance
  value: 2.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: Prodigals represent a pathological behavior pattern rather than a functional
    system component, making them difficult to map to any specific VSM system. They
    could be seen as failures in S3 (internal regulation) or S4 (intelligence), but
    they don't naturally correspond to viable system functions.
- name: explanatory_value
  value: 4.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: This entity provides significant explanatory power by identifying a specific
    mechanism of capital destruction that contrasts with productive economic activity.
    It illuminates Smith's broader argument about the importance of frugality and
    productive investment for economic growth.
---

# Evaluation: Prodigals

## definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0

The definition clearly distinguishes prodigals as economic actors who dissipate capital through unproductive consumption, contrasting them with productive borrowers. The concept is well-bounded and avoids circularity by defining the behavior (unproductive consumption of borrowed funds) rather than just restating the term.

## source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0

This entity is directly grounded in Smith's text from Book II, Chapter 4, where he explicitly discusses prodigals as a category of borrowers who waste capital. Smith uses this term and concept extensively to illustrate harmful economic behavior that destroys rather than creates value.

## domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0

The placement in "Consumption" domain is precisely correct, as prodigals are defined by their consumption patterns rather than production or investment activities. This distinguishes them from other economic actors and aligns with Smith's analysis of different types of economic behavior.

## vsm_relevance — 2.0 / 5.0

Prodigals represent a pathological behavior pattern rather than a functional system component, making them difficult to map to any specific VSM system. They could be seen as failures in S3 (internal regulation) or S4 (intelligence), but they don't naturally correspond to viable system functions.

## explanatory_value — 4.0 / 5.0

This entity provides significant explanatory power by identifying a specific mechanism of capital destruction that contrasts with productive economic activity. It illuminates Smith's broader argument about the importance of frugality and productive investment for economic growth.
