---
entity_slug: old_subsidy_drawback_rules
evaluator: null
evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T06:03:01.815879'
overall_score: 4.4
scores:
- name: definition_precision
  value: 4.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: The definition is quite precise, specifying exact timeframes (twelve
    months for English merchants, nine months for aliens) and clearly describing the
    mechanism of duty recovery upon exportation. It captures a distinct regulatory
    framework rather than a vague concept, though it could be slightly more concise.
- name: source_grounding
  value: 5.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: This entity is clearly grounded in the actual source text from Book IV,
    Chapter 4, which explicitly discusses the original subsidy act and its drawback
    provisions. The specific details about timeframes and different treatment for
    various goods directly reflect Smith's analysis of these historical regulations.
- name: domain_placement
  value: 5.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: The "Regulation" domain assignment is perfectly appropriate, as this
    entity describes specific administrative rules and procedures governing trade
    policy. These drawback rules represent a clear example of governmental regulation
    of commercial activity.
- name: vsm_relevance
  value: 4.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: This entity maps well to S3 (internal regulation/audit) as it represents
    the operational rules and monitoring mechanisms for duty recovery, and potentially
    to S2 (coordination) as it standardizes procedures across different merchant categories.
    The regulatory framework has clear VSM relevance for understanding systemic control
    mechanisms.
- name: explanatory_value
  value: 4.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: The entity provides genuine explanatory value by illuminating the specific
    mechanisms through which drawback policies operated and evolved, showing how different
    commodities and merchant types received differentiated treatment. It reveals structural
    relations in trade policy administration rather than merely naming a surface phenomenon.
---

# Evaluation: Old Subsidy Drawback Rules

## definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0

The definition is quite precise, specifying exact timeframes (twelve months for English merchants, nine months for aliens) and clearly describing the mechanism of duty recovery upon exportation. It captures a distinct regulatory framework rather than a vague concept, though it could be slightly more concise.

## source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0

This entity is clearly grounded in the actual source text from Book IV, Chapter 4, which explicitly discusses the original subsidy act and its drawback provisions. The specific details about timeframes and different treatment for various goods directly reflect Smith's analysis of these historical regulations.

## domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0

The "Regulation" domain assignment is perfectly appropriate, as this entity describes specific administrative rules and procedures governing trade policy. These drawback rules represent a clear example of governmental regulation of commercial activity.

## vsm_relevance — 4.0 / 5.0

This entity maps well to S3 (internal regulation/audit) as it represents the operational rules and monitoring mechanisms for duty recovery, and potentially to S2 (coordination) as it standardizes procedures across different merchant categories. The regulatory framework has clear VSM relevance for understanding systemic control mechanisms.

## explanatory_value — 4.0 / 5.0

The entity provides genuine explanatory value by illuminating the specific mechanisms through which drawback policies operated and evolved, showing how different commodities and merchant types received differentiated treatment. It reveals structural relations in trade policy administration rather than merely naming a surface phenomenon.
