---
entity_slug: capital_security_visibility
evaluator: null
evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T04:41:28.176869'
overall_score: 1.2
scores:
- name: definition_precision
  value: 1.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: There is no definition provided at all, making it impossible to assess
    precision or conceptual distinctness. The term "Capital Security Visibility" appears
    to be a compound phrase without clear boundaries or meaning.
- name: source_grounding
  value: 1.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: With no definition, context, or source chapter specified, there is no
    evidence this entity is grounded in Smith's actual text. The terminology feels
    modern and potentially anachronistic for 18th-century economic discourse.
- name: domain_placement
  value: 1.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: Without a specified domain or definition, it's impossible to assess whether
    the entity is correctly categorized. The entity appears to be a placeholder or
    incomplete entry rather than a properly classified concept.
- name: vsm_relevance
  value: 2.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: While "visibility" could theoretically relate to VSM information flows
    (particularly S3 audit or S4 intelligence functions), the lack of definition makes
    any VSM mapping purely speculative. The term suggests monitoring or transparency
    mechanisms but provides no concrete basis for system assignment.
- name: explanatory_value
  value: 1.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: An undefined entity cannot provide explanatory power or illuminate any
    mechanisms. This appears to be an empty conceptual container that adds no analytical
    value to understanding Smith's work or economic systems.
---

# Evaluation: Capital Security Visibility

## definition_precision — 1.0 / 5.0

There is no definition provided at all, making it impossible to assess precision or conceptual distinctness. The term "Capital Security Visibility" appears to be a compound phrase without clear boundaries or meaning.

## source_grounding — 1.0 / 5.0

With no definition, context, or source chapter specified, there is no evidence this entity is grounded in Smith's actual text. The terminology feels modern and potentially anachronistic for 18th-century economic discourse.

## domain_placement — 1.0 / 5.0

Without a specified domain or definition, it's impossible to assess whether the entity is correctly categorized. The entity appears to be a placeholder or incomplete entry rather than a properly classified concept.

## vsm_relevance — 2.0 / 5.0

While "visibility" could theoretically relate to VSM information flows (particularly S3 audit or S4 intelligence functions), the lack of definition makes any VSM mapping purely speculative. The term suggests monitoring or transparency mechanisms but provides no concrete basis for system assignment.

## explanatory_value — 1.0 / 5.0

An undefined entity cannot provide explanatory power or illuminate any mechanisms. This appears to be an empty conceptual container that adds no analytical value to understanding Smith's work or economic systems.
