---
entity_slug: colony_economic_system_outcomes
evaluator: null
evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T04:55:04.529955'
overall_score: 2.6
scores:
- name: definition_precision
  value: 2.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: The definition is vague and circular, essentially saying "outcomes are
    results that fell short due to flaws" without specifying what constitutes these
    outcomes or providing measurable criteria. It functions more as a general evaluative
    statement than a precise conceptual definition.
- name: source_grounding
  value: 4.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: This is well-grounded in Smith's actual analysis in Book V, Chapter 3,
    where he systematically evaluates the disappointing results of colonial policies
    and traces them to mercantilist misconceptions. The entity accurately reflects
    Smith's empirical assessment of colonial economic performance.
- name: domain_placement
  value: 3.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: While "Regulation" captures the policy evaluation aspect, this entity
    spans multiple domains since it encompasses trade outcomes, fiscal results, and
    broader economic effects. It might be better placed in a more comprehensive domain
    like "Colonial Economics" or "Policy Analysis."
- name: vsm_relevance
  value: 2.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: This entity represents evaluative outcomes rather than operational mechanisms,
    making it difficult to map to specific VSM systems. It's more of a performance
    assessment that could theoretically relate to S3 (audit) but lacks the structural
    specificity that VSM analysis requires.
- name: explanatory_value
  value: 2.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: The entity merely labels disappointing results without illuminating the
    underlying mechanisms that produced these outcomes or the structural relationships
    between colonial policies and their effects. It describes a surface phenomenon
    rather than explaining causal processes.
---

# Evaluation: Colony Economic System Outcomes

## definition_precision — 2.0 / 5.0

The definition is vague and circular, essentially saying "outcomes are results that fell short due to flaws" without specifying what constitutes these outcomes or providing measurable criteria. It functions more as a general evaluative statement than a precise conceptual definition.

## source_grounding — 4.0 / 5.0

This is well-grounded in Smith's actual analysis in Book V, Chapter 3, where he systematically evaluates the disappointing results of colonial policies and traces them to mercantilist misconceptions. The entity accurately reflects Smith's empirical assessment of colonial economic performance.

## domain_placement — 3.0 / 5.0

While "Regulation" captures the policy evaluation aspect, this entity spans multiple domains since it encompasses trade outcomes, fiscal results, and broader economic effects. It might be better placed in a more comprehensive domain like "Colonial Economics" or "Policy Analysis."

## vsm_relevance — 2.0 / 5.0

This entity represents evaluative outcomes rather than operational mechanisms, making it difficult to map to specific VSM systems. It's more of a performance assessment that could theoretically relate to S3 (audit) but lacks the structural specificity that VSM analysis requires.

## explanatory_value — 2.0 / 5.0

The entity merely labels disappointing results without illuminating the underlying mechanisms that produced these outcomes or the structural relationships between colonial policies and their effects. It describes a surface phenomenon rather than explaining causal processes.
