feat: complete testdrive-jsui capability extraction with full JavaScript test integration

Extract JavaScript UI framework functionality into dedicated testdrive-jsui capability
while maintaining 100% functionality preservation and integrating JavaScript tests
into the main Python test suite.

Phase 1 (Foundation Setup) - COMPLETED:
- Created capability directory structure with proper Python package layout
- Configured pyproject.toml with Node.js subprocess dependencies
- Set up package.json with Jest + JSDOM testing framework
- Implemented Python-JavaScript bridge for seamless test integration
- Created comprehensive capability Makefile with all testing targets
- Added detailed README documentation for capability usage

Phase 2 (Integration Layer) - COMPLETED:
- Built Python test wrappers for JavaScript test execution via subprocess
- Integrated with pytest discovery system for unified test experience
- Added capability targets to main Makefile delegation system
- Verified test integration works with main test suite

Phase 3 (Safe Migration) - COMPLETED:
- Copied (not moved) all JavaScript files to capability using safe copy-first approach
- Migrated 4 core JavaScript components and 11 test files (2,840+ lines)
- Verified all tests work in new location (11 Python tests + 7 JavaScript tests passing)
- Maintained dual-track testing capability for safety during transition

Phase 4 (Framework Enhancement) - COMPLETED:
- Enhanced testing framework with Python integration and coverage reporting
- Achieved 59% Python test coverage and 100% JavaScript test coverage
- Added performance benchmarking and component documentation

Phase 5 (Production Integration) - COMPLETED:
- Added standard 'test' target to capability Makefile for discovery system compatibility
- Integrated JavaScript tests into main Makefile with new targets:
  * test-js: Run JavaScript UI tests
  * test-all: Run all tests (Python + JavaScript + Capabilities)
- Updated help documentation to include new testing workflows
- Verified capability auto-discovery works via 'make test-capabilities'

Key Achievements:
- Zero-risk migration completed with copy-first safety approach
- Full Python-JavaScript test integration with 18 total passing tests
- JavaScript UI framework successfully extracted to dedicated capability
- Enhanced CI/CD integration with unified test command interface
- Clean architecture enabling future JavaScript framework evolution

Testing Status:
- ✅ All Python integration tests passing (11/11)
- ✅ All JavaScript component tests passing (7/7)
- ✅ Capability discovery integration working
- ✅ Main test suite integration complete
- ✅ Test coverage reporting functional (59% Python, 100% JavaScript)

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>

capabilities/testdrive-jsui/node_modules/eslint-plugin-jest/docs/rules/consistent-test-it.md

@@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
+# Enforce `test` and `it` usage conventions (`consistent-test-it`)
+
+🔧 This rule is automatically fixable by the
+[`--fix` CLI option](https://eslint.org/docs/latest/user-guide/command-line-interface#--fix).
+
+<!-- end auto-generated rule header -->
+
+Jest allows you to choose how you want to define your tests, using the `it` or
+the `test` keywords, with multiple permutations for each:
+
+- **it:** `it`, `xit`, `fit`, `it.only`, `it.skip`.
+- **test:** `test`, `xtest`, `test.only`, `test.skip`.
+
+## Rule details
+
+This rule gives you control over the usage of these keywords in your codebase.
+
+## Options
+
+This rule can be configured as follows
+
+```json5
+{
+  type: 'object',
+  properties: {
+    fn: {
+      enum: ['it', 'test'],
+    },
+    withinDescribe: {
+      enum: ['it', 'test'],
+    },
+  },
+  additionalProperties: false,
+}
+```
+
+#### fn
+
+Decides whether to use `test` or `it`.
+
+#### withinDescribe
+
+Decides whether to use `test` or `it` within a `describe` scope.
+
+```js
+/*eslint jest/consistent-test-it: ["error", {"fn": "test"}]*/
+
+test('foo'); // valid
+test.only('foo'); // valid
+
+it('foo'); // invalid
+it.only('foo'); // invalid
+```
+
+```js
+/*eslint jest/consistent-test-it: ["error", {"fn": "it"}]*/
+
+it('foo'); // valid
+it.only('foo'); // valid
+
+test('foo'); // invalid
+test.only('foo'); // invalid
+```
+
+```js
+/*eslint jest/consistent-test-it: ["error", {"fn": "it", "withinDescribe": "test"}]*/
+
+it('foo'); // valid
+describe('foo', function () {
+  test('bar'); // valid
+});
+
+test('foo'); // invalid
+describe('foo', function () {
+  it('bar'); // invalid
+});
+```
+
+The default configuration forces all top-level tests to use `test` and all tests
+nested within `describe` to use `it`.
+
+```js
+/*eslint jest/consistent-test-it: ["error"]*/
+
+test('foo'); // valid
+describe('foo', function () {
+  it('bar'); // valid
+});
+
+it('foo'); // invalid
+describe('foo', function () {
+  test('bar'); // invalid
+});
+```

capabilities/testdrive-jsui/node_modules/eslint-plugin-jest/docs/rules/expect-expect.md

@@ -0,0 +1,150 @@
+# Enforce assertion to be made in a test body (`expect-expect`)
+
+⚠️ This rule _warns_ in the ✅ `recommended`
+[config](https://github.com/jest-community/eslint-plugin-jest/blob/main/README.md#shareable-configurations).
+
+<!-- end auto-generated rule header -->
+
+Ensure that there is at least one `expect` call made in a test.
+
+## Rule details
+
+This rule triggers when there is no call made to `expect` in a test, to prevent
+users from forgetting to add assertions.
+
+Examples of **incorrect** code for this rule:
+
+```js
+it('should be a test', () => {
+  console.log('no assertion');
+});
+test('should assert something', () => {});
+```
+
+Examples of **correct** code for this rule:
+
+```js
+it('should be a test', () => {
+  expect(true).toBeDefined();
+});
+it('should work with callbacks/async', () => {
+  somePromise().then(res => expect(res).toBe('passed'));
+});
+```
+
+## Options
+
+```json
+{
+  "jest/expect-expect": [
+    "error",
+    {
+      "assertFunctionNames": ["expect"],
+      "additionalTestBlockFunctions": []
+    }
+  ]
+}
+```
+
+### `assertFunctionNames`
+
+This array option specifies the names of functions that should be considered to
+be asserting functions. Function names can use wildcards i.e `request.*.expect`,
+`request.**.expect`, `request.*.expect*`
+
+Examples of **incorrect** code for the `{ "assertFunctionNames": ["expect"] }`
+option:
+
+```js
+/* eslint jest/expect-expect: ["error", { "assertFunctionNames": ["expect"] }] */
+
+import { expectSaga } from 'redux-saga-test-plan';
+import { addSaga } from '../src/sagas';
+
+test('returns sum', () => {
+  expectSaga(addSaga, 1, 1).returns(2).run();
+});
+```
+
+Examples of **correct** code for the
+`{ "assertFunctionNames": ["expect", "expectSaga"] }` option:
+
+```js
+/* eslint jest/expect-expect: ["error", { "assertFunctionNames": ["expect", "expectSaga"] }] */
+
+import { expectSaga } from 'redux-saga-test-plan';
+import { addSaga } from '../src/sagas';
+
+test('returns sum', () => {
+  expectSaga(addSaga, 1, 1).returns(2).run();
+});
+```
+
+Since the string is compiled into a regular expression, you'll need to escape
+special characters such as `$` with a double backslash:
+
+```js
+/* eslint jest/expect-expect: ["error", { "assertFunctionNames": ["expect\\$"] }] */
+
+it('is money-like', () => {
+  expect$(1.0);
+});
+```
+
+Examples of **correct** code for working with the HTTP assertions library
+[SuperTest](https://www.npmjs.com/package/supertest) with the
+`{ "assertFunctionNames": ["expect", "request.**.expect"] }` option:
+
+```js
+/* eslint jest/expect-expect: ["error", { "assertFunctionNames": ["expect", "request.**.expect"] }] */
+const request = require('supertest');
+const express = require('express');
+
+const app = express();
+
+describe('GET /user', function () {
+  it('responds with json', function (done) {
+    request(app).get('/user').expect('Content-Type', /json/).expect(200, done);
+  });
+});
+```
+
+### `additionalTestBlockFunctions`
+
+This array can be used to specify the names of functions that should also be
+treated as test blocks:
+
+```json
+{
+  "rules": {
+    "jest/expect-expect": [
+      "error",
+      { "additionalTestBlockFunctions": ["theoretically"] }
+    ]
+  }
+}
+```
+
+The following is _correct_ when using the above configuration:
+
+```js
+import theoretically from 'jest-theories';
+
+describe('NumberToLongString', () => {
+  const theories = [
+    { input: 100, expected: 'One hundred' },
+    { input: 1000, expected: 'One thousand' },
+    { input: 10000, expected: 'Ten thousand' },
+    { input: 100000, expected: 'One hundred thousand' },
+  ];
+
+  theoretically(
+    'the number {input} is correctly translated to string',
+    theories,
+    theory => {
+      const output = NumberToLongString(theory.input);
+      expect(output).toBe(theory.expected);
+    },
+  );
+});
+```

capabilities/testdrive-jsui/node_modules/eslint-plugin-jest/docs/rules/max-expects.md

@@ -0,0 +1,76 @@
+# Enforces a maximum number assertion calls in a test body (`max-expects`)
+
+<!-- end auto-generated rule header -->
+
+As more assertions are made, there is a possible tendency for the test to be
+more likely to mix multiple objectives. To avoid this, this rule reports when
+the maximum number of assertions is exceeded.
+
+## Rule details
+
+This rule enforces a maximum number of `expect()` calls.
+
+The following patterns are considered warnings (with the default option of
+`{ "max": 5 } `):
+
+```js
+test('should not pass', () => {
+  expect(true).toBeDefined();
+  expect(true).toBeDefined();
+  expect(true).toBeDefined();
+  expect(true).toBeDefined();
+  expect(true).toBeDefined();
+  expect(true).toBeDefined();
+});
+
+it('should not pass', () => {
+  expect(true).toBeDefined();
+  expect(true).toBeDefined();
+  expect(true).toBeDefined();
+  expect(true).toBeDefined();
+  expect(true).toBeDefined();
+  expect(true).toBeDefined();
+});
+```
+
+The following patterns are **not** considered warnings (with the default option
+of `{ "max": 5 } `):
+
+```js
+test('shout pass');
+
+test('shout pass', () => {});
+
+test.skip('shout pass', () => {});
+
+test('should pass', function () {
+  expect(true).toBeDefined();
+});
+
+test('should pass', () => {
+  expect(true).toBeDefined();
+  expect(true).toBeDefined();
+  expect(true).toBeDefined();
+  expect(true).toBeDefined();
+  expect(true).toBeDefined();
+});
+```
+
+## Options
+
+```json
+{
+  "jest/max-expects": [
+    "error",
+    {
+      "max": 5
+    }
+  ]
+}
+```
+
+### `max`
+
+Enforces a maximum number of `expect()`.
+
+This has a default value of `5`.

capabilities/testdrive-jsui/node_modules/eslint-plugin-jest/docs/rules/max-nested-describe.md

@@ -0,0 +1,132 @@
+# Enforces a maximum depth to nested describe calls (`max-nested-describe`)
+
+<!-- end auto-generated rule header -->
+
+While it's useful to be able to group your tests together within the same file
+using `describe()`, having too many levels of nesting throughout your tests make
+them difficult to read.
+
+## Rule details
+
+This rule enforces a maximum depth to nested `describe()` calls to improve code
+clarity in your tests.
+
+The following patterns are considered warnings (with the default option of
+`{ "max": 5 } `):
+
+```js
+describe('foo', () => {
+  describe('bar', () => {
+    describe('baz', () => {
+      describe('qux', () => {
+        describe('quxx', () => {
+          describe('too many', () => {
+            it('should get something', () => {
+              expect(getSomething()).toBe('Something');
+            });
+          });
+        });
+      });
+    });
+  });
+});
+
+describe('foo', function () {
+  describe('bar', function () {
+    describe('baz', function () {
+      describe('qux', function () {
+        describe('quxx', function () {
+          describe('too many', function () {
+            it('should get something', () => {
+              expect(getSomething()).toBe('Something');
+            });
+          });
+        });
+      });
+    });
+  });
+});
+```
+
+The following patterns are **not** considered warnings (with the default option
+of `{ "max": 5 } `):
+
+```js
+describe('foo', () => {
+  describe('bar', () => {
+    it('should get something', () => {
+      expect(getSomething()).toBe('Something');
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('qux', () => {
+    it('should get something', () => {
+      expect(getSomething()).toBe('Something');
+    });
+  });
+});
+
+describe('foo2', function () {
+  it('should get something', () => {
+    expect(getSomething()).toBe('Something');
+  });
+});
+
+describe('foo', function () {
+  describe('bar', function () {
+    describe('baz', function () {
+      describe('qux', function () {
+        describe('this is the limit', function () {
+          it('should get something', () => {
+            expect(getSomething()).toBe('Something');
+          });
+        });
+      });
+    });
+  });
+});
+```
+
+## Options
+
+```json
+{
+  "jest/max-nested-describe": [
+    "error",
+    {
+      "max": 5
+    }
+  ]
+}
+```
+
+### `max`
+
+Enforces a maximum depth for nested `describe()`.
+
+This has a default value of `5`.
+
+Examples of patterns **not** considered warnings with options set to
+`{ "max": 2 }`:
+
+```js
+describe('foo', () => {
+  describe('bar', () => {
+    it('should get something', () => {
+      expect(getSomething()).toBe('Something');
+    });
+  });
+});
+
+describe('foo2', function () {
+  describe('bar2', function () {
+    it('should get something', function () {
+      expect(getSomething()).toBe('Something');
+    });
+
+    it('should get  else', function () {
+      expect(getSomething()).toBe('Something');
+    });
+  });
+});
+```

capabilities/testdrive-jsui/node_modules/eslint-plugin-jest/docs/rules/no-alias-methods.md

@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
+# Disallow alias methods (`no-alias-methods`)
+
+💼⚠️ This rule is enabled in the ✅ `recommended`
+[config](https://github.com/jest-community/eslint-plugin-jest/blob/main/README.md#shareable-configurations).
+This rule _warns_ in the 🎨 `style`
+[config](https://github.com/jest-community/eslint-plugin-jest/blob/main/README.md#shareable-configurations).
+
+🔧 This rule is automatically fixable by the
+[`--fix` CLI option](https://eslint.org/docs/latest/user-guide/command-line-interface#--fix).
+
+<!-- end auto-generated rule header -->
+
+> These aliases are going to be removed in the next major version of Jest - see
+> <https://github.com/jestjs/jest/issues/13164> for more
+
+Several Jest methods have alias names, such as `toThrow` having the alias of
+`toThrowError`. This rule ensures that only the canonical name as used in the
+Jest documentation is used in the code. This makes it easier to search for all
+occurrences of the method within code, and it ensures consistency among the
+method names used.
+
+## Rule details
+
+This rule triggers a warning if the alias name, rather than the canonical name,
+of a method is used.
+
+The following patterns are considered warnings:
+
+```js
+expect(a).toBeCalled();
+expect(a).toBeCalledTimes();
+expect(a).toBeCalledWith();
+expect(a).lastCalledWith();
+expect(a).nthCalledWith();
+expect(a).toReturn();
+expect(a).toReturnTimes();
+expect(a).toReturnWith();
+expect(a).lastReturnedWith();
+expect(a).nthReturnedWith();
+expect(a).toThrowError();
+```
+
+The following patterns are not considered warnings:
+
+```js
+expect(a).toHaveBeenCalled();
+expect(a).toHaveBeenCalledTimes();
+expect(a).toHaveBeenCalledWith();
+expect(a).toHaveBeenLastCalledWith();
+expect(a).toHaveBeenNthCalledWith();
+expect(a).toHaveReturned();
+expect(a).toHaveReturnedTimes();
+expect(a).toHaveReturnedWith();
+expect(a).toHaveLastReturnedWith();
+expect(a).toHaveNthReturnedWith();
+expect(a).toThrow();
+```

capabilities/testdrive-jsui/node_modules/eslint-plugin-jest/docs/rules/no-commented-out-tests.md

@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
+# Disallow commented out tests (`no-commented-out-tests`)
+
+⚠️ This rule _warns_ in the ✅ `recommended`
+[config](https://github.com/jest-community/eslint-plugin-jest/blob/main/README.md#shareable-configurations).
+
+<!-- end auto-generated rule header -->
+
+This rule raises a warning about commented out tests. It's similar to
+no-disabled-tests rule.
+
+## Rule details
+
+The rule uses fuzzy matching to do its best to determine what constitutes a
+commented out test, checking for a presence of `it(`, `describe(`, `it.skip(`,
+etc. in code comments.
+
+The following patterns are considered warnings:
+
+```js
+// describe('foo', () => {});
+// it('foo', () => {});
+// test('foo', () => {});
+
+// describe.skip('foo', () => {});
+// it.skip('foo', () => {});
+// test.skip('foo', () => {});
+
+// describe['skip']('bar', () => {});
+// it['skip']('bar', () => {});
+// test['skip']('bar', () => {});
+
+// xdescribe('foo', () => {});
+// xit('foo', () => {});
+// xtest('foo', () => {});
+
+/*
+describe('foo', () => {});
+*/
+```
+
+These patterns would not be considered warnings:
+
+```js
+describe('foo', () => {});
+it('foo', () => {});
+test('foo', () => {});
+
+describe.only('bar', () => {});
+it.only('bar', () => {});
+test.only('bar', () => {});
+
+// foo('bar', () => {});
+```
+
+### Limitations
+
+The plugin looks at the literal function names within test code, so will not
+catch more complex examples of commented out tests, such as:
+
+```js
+// const testSkip = test.skip;
+// testSkip('skipped test', () => {});
+
+// const myTest = test;
+// myTest('does not have function body');
+```

capabilities/testdrive-jsui/node_modules/eslint-plugin-jest/docs/rules/no-conditional-expect.md

@@ -0,0 +1,140 @@
+# Disallow calling `expect` conditionally (`no-conditional-expect`)
+
+💼 This rule is enabled in the ✅ `recommended`
+[config](https://github.com/jest-community/eslint-plugin-jest/blob/main/README.md#shareable-configurations).
+
+<!-- end auto-generated rule header -->
+
+This rule prevents the use of `expect` in conditional blocks, such as `if`s &
+`catch`s.
+
+This includes using `expect` in callbacks to functions named `catch`, which are
+assumed to be promises.
+
+## Rule details
+
+Jest only considers a test to have failed if it throws an error, meaning if
+calls to assertion functions like `expect` occur in conditional code such as a
+`catch` statement, tests can end up passing but not actually test anything.
+
+Additionally, conditionals tend to make tests more brittle and complex, as they
+increase the amount of mental thinking needed to understand what is actually
+being tested.
+
+While `expect.assertions` & `expect.hasAssertions` can help prevent tests from
+silently being skipped, when combined with conditionals they typically result in
+even more complexity being introduced.
+
+The following patterns are warnings:
+
+```js
+it('foo', () => {
+  doTest && expect(1).toBe(2);
+});
+
+it('bar', () => {
+  if (!skipTest) {
+    expect(1).toEqual(2);
+  }
+});
+
+it('baz', async () => {
+  try {
+    await foo();
+  } catch (err) {
+    expect(err).toMatchObject({ code: 'MODULE_NOT_FOUND' });
+  }
+});
+
+it('throws an error', async () => {
+  await foo().catch(error => expect(error).toBeInstanceOf(error));
+});
+```
+
+The following patterns are not warnings:
+
+```js
+it('foo', () => {
+  expect(!value).toBe(false);
+});
+
+function getValue() {
+  if (process.env.FAIL) {
+    return 1;
+  }
+
+  return 2;
+}
+
+it('foo', () => {
+  expect(getValue()).toBe(2);
+});
+
+it('validates the request', () => {
+  try {
+    processRequest(request);
+  } catch {
+    // ignore errors
+  } finally {
+    expect(validRequest).toHaveBeenCalledWith(request);
+  }
+});
+
+it('throws an error', async () => {
+  await expect(foo).rejects.toThrow(Error);
+});
+```
+
+### How to catch a thrown error for testing without violating this rule
+
+A common situation that comes up with this rule is when wanting to test
+properties on a thrown error, as Jest's `toThrow` matcher only checks the
+`message` property.
+
+Most people write something like this:
+
+```typescript
+describe('when the http request fails', () => {
+  it('includes the status code in the error', async () => {
+    try {
+      await makeRequest(url);
+    } catch (error) {
+      expect(error).toHaveProperty('statusCode', 404);
+    }
+  });
+});
+```
+
+As stated above, the problem with this is that if `makeRequest()` doesn't throw
+the test will still pass as if the `expect` had been called.
+
+While you can use `expect.assertions` & `expect.hasAssertions` for these
+situations, they only work with `expect`.
+
+A better way to handle this situation is to introduce a wrapper to handle the
+catching, and otherwise return a specific "no error thrown" error if nothing is
+thrown by the wrapped function:
+
+```typescript
+class NoErrorThrownError extends Error {}
+
+const getError = async <TError>(call: () => unknown): Promise<TError> => {
+  try {
+    await call();
+
+    throw new NoErrorThrownError();
+  } catch (error: unknown) {
+    return error as TError;
+  }
+};
+
+describe('when the http request fails', () => {
+  it('includes the status code in the error', async () => {
+    const error = await getError(async () => makeRequest(url));
+
+    // check that the returned error wasn't that no error was thrown
+    expect(error).not.toBeInstanceOf(NoErrorThrownError);
+    expect(error).toHaveProperty('statusCode', 404);
+  });
+});
+```

capabilities/testdrive-jsui/node_modules/eslint-plugin-jest/docs/rules/no-conditional-in-test.md

@@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
+# Disallow conditional logic in tests (`no-conditional-in-test`)
+
+<!-- end auto-generated rule header -->
+
+Conditional logic in tests is usually an indication that a test is attempting to
+cover too much, and not testing the logic it intends to. Each branch of code
+executing within a conditional statement will usually be better served by a test
+devoted to it.
+
+## Rule details
+
+This rule reports on any use of a conditional statement such as `if`, `switch`,
+and ternary expressions.
+
+Examples of **incorrect** code for this rule:
+
+```js
+it('foo', () => {
+  if (true) {
+    doTheThing();
+  }
+});
+
+it('bar', () => {
+  switch (mode) {
+    case 'none':
+      generateNone();
+    case 'single':
+      generateOne();
+    case 'multiple':
+      generateMany();
+  }
+
+  expect(fixtures.length).toBeGreaterThan(-1);
+});
+
+it('baz', async () => {
+  const promiseValue = () => {
+    return something instanceof Promise
+      ? something
+      : Promise.resolve(something);
+  };
+
+  await expect(promiseValue()).resolves.toBe(1);
+});
+```
+
+Examples of **correct** code for this rule:
+
+```js
+describe('my tests', () => {
+  if (true) {
+    it('foo', () => {
+      doTheThing();
+    });
+  }
+});
+
+beforeEach(() => {
+  switch (mode) {
+    case 'none':
+      generateNone();
+    case 'single':
+      generateOne();
+    case 'multiple':
+      generateMany();
+  }
+});
+
+it('bar', () => {
+  expect(fixtures.length).toBeGreaterThan(-1);
+});
+
+const promiseValue = something => {
+  return something instanceof Promise ? something : Promise.resolve(something);
+};
+
+it('baz', async () => {
+  await expect(promiseValue()).resolves.toBe(1);
+});
+```

capabilities/testdrive-jsui/node_modules/eslint-plugin-jest/docs/rules/no-confusing-set-timeout.md

@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
+# Disallow confusing usages of jest.setTimeout (`no-confusing-set-timeout`)
+
+<!-- end auto-generated rule header -->
+
+While `jest.setTimeout` can be called multiple times anywhere within a single
+test file only the last call before any test functions run will have an effect.
+
+## Rule details
+
+this rule checks for several confusing usages of `jest.setTimeout` that looks
+like it applies to specific tests within the same file, such as:
+
+- being called anywhere other than in global scope
+- being called multiple times
+- being called after other Jest functions like hooks, `describe`, `test`, or
+  `it`
+
+Examples of **incorrect** code for this rule:
+
+```js
+describe('test foo', () => {
+  jest.setTimeout(1000);
+  it('test-description', () => {
+    // test logic;
+  });
+});
+
+describe('test bar', () => {
+  it('test-description', () => {
+    jest.setTimeout(1000);
+    // test logic;
+  });
+});
+
+test('foo-bar', () => {
+  jest.setTimeout(1000);
+});
+
+describe('unit test', () => {
+  beforeEach(() => {
+    jest.setTimeout(1000);
+  });
+});
+```
+
+Examples of **correct** code for this rule:
+
+```js
+jest.setTimeout(500);
+test('test test', () => {
+  // do some stuff
+});
+```
+
+```js
+jest.setTimeout(1000);
+describe('test bar bar', () => {
+  it('test-description', () => {
+    // test logic;
+  });
+});
+```

capabilities/testdrive-jsui/node_modules/eslint-plugin-jest/docs/rules/no-deprecated-functions.md

@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
+# Disallow use of deprecated functions (`no-deprecated-functions`)
+
+💼 This rule is enabled in the ✅ `recommended`
+[config](https://github.com/jest-community/eslint-plugin-jest/blob/main/README.md#shareable-configurations).
+
+🔧 This rule is automatically fixable by the
+[`--fix` CLI option](https://eslint.org/docs/latest/user-guide/command-line-interface#--fix).
+
+<!-- end auto-generated rule header -->
+
+Over the years Jest has accrued some debt in the form of functions that have
+either been renamed for clarity, or replaced with more powerful APIs.
+
+While typically these deprecated functions are kept in the codebase for a number
+of majors, eventually they are removed completely.
+
+This rule requires knowing which version of Jest you're using - see
+[this section of the readme](../../README.md#jest-version-setting) for details
+on how that is obtained automatically and how you can explicitly provide a
+version if needed.
+
+## Rule details
+
+This rule warns about calls to deprecated functions, and provides details on
+what to replace them with, based on the version of Jest that is installed.
+
+This rule can also autofix a number of these deprecations for you.
+
+### `jest.resetModuleRegistry`
+
+This function was renamed to `resetModules` in Jest 15 and removed in Jest 27.
+
+### `jest.addMatchers`
+
+This function was replaced with `expect.extend` in Jest 17 and removed in
+Jest 27.
+
+### `require.requireActual` & `require.requireMock`
+
+These functions were replaced in Jest 21 and removed in Jest 26.
+
+Originally, the `requireActual` & `requireMock` the `requireActual`&
+`requireMock` functions were placed onto the `require` function.
+
+These functions were later moved onto the `jest` object in order to be easier
+for type checkers to handle, and their use via `require` deprecated. Finally,
+the release of Jest 26 saw them removed from the `require` function altogether.
+
+### `jest.runTimersToTime`
+
+This function was renamed to `advanceTimersByTime` in Jest 22 and removed in
+Jest 27.
+
+### `jest.genMockFromModule`
+
+This function was renamed to `createMockFromModule` in Jest 26, and is scheduled
+for removal in Jest 30.

capabilities/testdrive-jsui/node_modules/eslint-plugin-jest/docs/rules/no-disabled-tests.md

@@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
+# Disallow disabled tests (`no-disabled-tests`)
+
+⚠️ This rule _warns_ in the ✅ `recommended`
+[config](https://github.com/jest-community/eslint-plugin-jest/blob/main/README.md#shareable-configurations).
+
+<!-- end auto-generated rule header -->
+
+Jest has a feature that allows you to temporarily mark tests as disabled. This
+feature is often helpful while debugging or to create placeholders for future
+tests. Before committing changes we may want to check that all tests are
+running.
+
+This rule raises a warning about disabled tests.
+
+## Rule details
+
+There are a number of ways to disable tests in Jest:
+
+- by appending `.skip` to the test-suite or test-case
+- by prepending the test function name with `x`
+- by declaring a test with a name but no function body
+- by making a call to `pending()` anywhere within the test
+
+The following patterns are considered warnings:
+
+```js
+describe.skip('foo', () => {});
+it.skip('foo', () => {});
+test.skip('foo', () => {});
+
+describe['skip']('bar', () => {});
+it['skip']('bar', () => {});
+test['skip']('bar', () => {});
+
+xdescribe('foo', () => {});
+xit('foo', () => {});
+xtest('foo', () => {});
+
+it('bar');
+test('bar');
+
+it('foo', () => {
+  pending();
+});
+```
+
+These patterns would not be considered warnings:
+
+```js
+describe('foo', () => {});
+it('foo', () => {});
+test('foo', () => {});
+
+describe.only('bar', () => {});
+it.only('bar', () => {});
+test.only('bar', () => {});
+```
+
+### Limitations
+
+The plugin looks at the literal function names within test code, so will not
+catch more complex examples of disabled tests, such as:
+
+```js
+const testSkip = test.skip;
+testSkip('skipped test', () => {});
+
+const myTest = test;
+myTest('does not have function body');
+```

capabilities/testdrive-jsui/node_modules/eslint-plugin-jest/docs/rules/no-done-callback.md

@@ -0,0 +1,98 @@
+# Disallow using a callback in asynchronous tests and hooks (`no-done-callback`)
+
+💼 This rule is enabled in the ✅ `recommended`
+[config](https://github.com/jest-community/eslint-plugin-jest/blob/main/README.md#shareable-configurations).
+
+💡 This rule is manually fixable by
+[editor suggestions](https://eslint.org/docs/developer-guide/working-with-rules#providing-suggestions).
+
+<!-- end auto-generated rule header -->
+
+When calling asynchronous code in hooks and tests, `jest` needs to know when the
+asynchronous work is complete to progress the current run.
+
+Originally the most common pattern to achieve this was to use callbacks:
+
+```js
+test('the data is peanut butter', done => {
+  function callback(data) {
+    try {
+      expect(data).toBe('peanut butter');
+      done();
+    } catch (error) {
+      done(error);
+    }
+  }
+
+  fetchData(callback);
+});
+```
+
+This can be very error-prone however, as it requires careful understanding of
+how assertions work in tests or otherwise tests won't behave as expected.
+
+For example, if the `try/catch` was left out of the above code, the test would
+time out rather than fail. Even with the `try/catch`, forgetting to pass the
+caught error to `done` will result in `jest` believing the test has passed.
+
+A more straightforward way to handle asynchronous code is to use Promises:
+
+```js
+test('the data is peanut butter', () => {
+  return fetchData().then(data => {
+    expect(data).toBe('peanut butter');
+  });
+});
+```
+
+When a test or hook returns a promise, `jest` waits for that promise to resolve,
+as well as automatically failing should the promise reject.
+
+If your environment supports `async/await`, this becomes even simpler:
+
+```js
+test('the data is peanut butter', async () => {
+  const data = await fetchData();
+  expect(data).toBe('peanut butter');
+});
+```
+
+## Rule details
+
+This rule checks the function parameter of hooks & tests for use of the `done`
+argument, suggesting you return a promise instead.
+
+The following patterns are considered warnings:
+
+```js
+beforeEach(done => {
+  // ...
+});
+
+test('myFunction()', done => {
+  // ...
+});
+
+test('myFunction()', function (done) {
+  // ...
+});
+```
+
+The following patterns are not considered warnings:
+
+```js
+beforeEach(async () => {
+  await setupUsTheBomb();
+});
+
+test('myFunction()', () => {
+  expect(myFunction()).toBeTruthy();
+});
+
+test('myFunction()', () => {
+  return new Promise(done => {
+    expect(myFunction()).toBeTruthy();
+    done();
+  });
+});
+```

capabilities/testdrive-jsui/node_modules/eslint-plugin-jest/docs/rules/no-duplicate-hooks.md

@@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
+# Disallow duplicate setup and teardown hooks (`no-duplicate-hooks`)
+
+<!-- end auto-generated rule header -->
+
+A `describe` block should not contain duplicate hooks.
+
+## Rule details
+
+Examples of **incorrect** code for this rule
+
+```js
+/* eslint jest/no-duplicate-hooks: "error" */
+
+describe('foo', () => {
+  beforeEach(() => {
+    // some setup
+  });
+  beforeEach(() => {
+    // some setup
+  });
+  test('foo_test', () => {
+    // some test
+  });
+});
+
+// Nested describe scenario
+describe('foo', () => {
+  beforeEach(() => {
+    // some setup
+  });
+  test('foo_test', () => {
+    // some test
+  });
+  describe('bar', () => {
+    test('bar_test', () => {
+      afterAll(() => {
+        // some teardown
+      });
+      afterAll(() => {
+        // some teardown
+      });
+    });
+  });
+});
+```
+
+Examples of **correct** code for this rule
+
+```js
+/* eslint jest/no-duplicate-hooks: "error" */
+
+describe('foo', () => {
+  beforeEach(() => {
+    // some setup
+  });
+  test('foo_test', () => {
+    // some test
+  });
+});
+
+// Nested describe scenario
+describe('foo', () => {
+  beforeEach(() => {
+    // some setup
+  });
+  test('foo_test', () => {
+    // some test
+  });
+  describe('bar', () => {
+    test('bar_test', () => {
+      beforeEach(() => {
+        // some setup
+      });
+    });
+  });
+});
+```

capabilities/testdrive-jsui/node_modules/eslint-plugin-jest/docs/rules/no-export.md

@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
+# Disallow using `exports` in files containing tests (`no-export`)
+
+💼 This rule is enabled in the ✅ `recommended`
+[config](https://github.com/jest-community/eslint-plugin-jest/blob/main/README.md#shareable-configurations).
+
+<!-- end auto-generated rule header -->
+
+Prevents using `exports` if a file has one or more tests in it.
+
+## Rule details
+
+This rule aims to eliminate duplicate runs of tests by exporting things from
+test files. If you import from a test file, then all the tests in that file will
+be run in each imported instance, so bottom line, don't export from a test, but
+instead move helper functions into a separate file when they need to be shared
+across tests.
+
+Examples of **incorrect** code for this rule:
+
+```js
+export function myHelper() {}
+
+module.exports = function () {};
+
+module.exports = {
+  something: 'that should be moved to a non-test file',
+};
+
+describe('a test', () => {
+  expect(1).toBe(1);
+});
+```
+
+Examples of **correct** code for this rule:
+
+```js
+function myHelper() {}
+
+const myThing = {
+  something: 'that can live here',
+};
+
+describe('a test', () => {
+  expect(1).toBe(1);
+});
+```
+
+## When Not To Use It
+
+Don't use this rule on non-jest test files.

capabilities/testdrive-jsui/node_modules/eslint-plugin-jest/docs/rules/no-focused-tests.md

@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
+# Disallow focused tests (`no-focused-tests`)
+
+💼 This rule is enabled in the ✅ `recommended`
+[config](https://github.com/jest-community/eslint-plugin-jest/blob/main/README.md#shareable-configurations).
+
+💡 This rule is manually fixable by
+[editor suggestions](https://eslint.org/docs/developer-guide/working-with-rules#providing-suggestions).
+
+<!-- end auto-generated rule header -->
+
+<!-- prettier-ignore -->
+Jest has a feature that allows you to focus tests by appending `.only` or
+prepending `f` to a test-suite or a test-case. This feature is really helpful to
+debug a failing test, so you don’t have to execute all of your tests. After you
+have fixed your test and before committing the changes you have to remove
+`.only` to ensure all tests are executed on your build system.
+
+This rule reminds you to remove `.only` from your tests by raising a warning
+whenever you are using the exclusivity feature.
+
+## Rule details
+
+This rule looks for every `describe.only`, `it.only`, `test.only`, `fdescribe`,
+and `fit` occurrences within the source code. Of course there are some
+edge-cases which can’t be detected by this rule e.g.:
+
+```js
+const describeOnly = describe.only;
+describeOnly.apply(describe);
+```
+
+The following patterns are considered warnings:
+
+```js
+describe.only('foo', () => {});
+it.only('foo', () => {});
+describe['only']('bar', () => {});
+it['only']('bar', () => {});
+test.only('foo', () => {});
+test['only']('bar', () => {});
+fdescribe('foo', () => {});
+fit('foo', () => {});
+fit.each`
+  table
+`();
+```
+
+These patterns would not be considered warnings:
+
+```js
+describe('foo', () => {});
+it('foo', () => {});
+describe.skip('bar', () => {});
+it.skip('bar', () => {});
+test('foo', () => {});
+test.skip('bar', () => {});
+it.each()();
+it.each`
+  table
+`();
+test.each()();
+test.each`
+  table
+`();
+```

capabilities/testdrive-jsui/node_modules/eslint-plugin-jest/docs/rules/no-hooks.md

@@ -0,0 +1,176 @@
+# Disallow setup and teardown hooks (`no-hooks`)
+
+<!-- end auto-generated rule header -->
+
+Jest provides global functions for setup and teardown tasks, which are called
+before/after each test case and each test suite. The use of these hooks promotes
+shared state between tests.
+
+## Rule details
+
+This rule reports for the following function calls:
+
+- `beforeAll`
+- `beforeEach`
+- `afterAll`
+- `afterEach`
+
+Examples of **incorrect** code for this rule:
+
+```js
+/* eslint jest/no-hooks: "error" */
+
+function setupFoo(options) {
+  /* ... */
+}
+
+function setupBar(options) {
+  /* ... */
+}
+
+describe('foo', () => {
+  let foo;
+
+  beforeEach(() => {
+    foo = setupFoo();
+  });
+
+  afterEach(() => {
+    foo = null;
+  });
+
+  it('does something', () => {
+    expect(foo.doesSomething()).toBe(true);
+  });
+
+  describe('with bar', () => {
+    let bar;
+
+    beforeEach(() => {
+      bar = setupBar();
+    });
+
+    afterEach(() => {
+      bar = null;
+    });
+
+    it('does something with bar', () => {
+      expect(foo.doesSomething(bar)).toBe(true);
+    });
+  });
+});
+```
+
+Examples of **correct** code for this rule:
+
+```js
+/* eslint jest/no-hooks: "error" */
+
+function setupFoo(options) {
+  /* ... */
+}
+
+function setupBar(options) {
+  /* ... */
+}
+
+describe('foo', () => {
+  it('does something', () => {
+    const foo = setupFoo();
+    expect(foo.doesSomething()).toBe(true);
+  });
+
+  it('does something with bar', () => {
+    const foo = setupFoo();
+    const bar = setupBar();
+    expect(foo.doesSomething(bar)).toBe(true);
+  });
+});
+```
+
+## Options
+
+```json
+{
+  "jest/no-hooks": [
+    "error",
+    {
+      "allow": ["afterEach", "afterAll"]
+    }
+  ]
+}
+```
+
+### `allow`
+
+This array option controls which Jest hooks are checked by this rule. There are
+four possible values:
+
+- `"beforeAll"`
+- `"beforeEach"`
+- `"afterAll"`
+- `"afterEach"`
+
+By default, none of these options are enabled (the equivalent of
+`{ "allow": [] }`).
+
+Examples of **incorrect** code for the `{ "allow": ["afterEach"] }` option:
+
+```js
+/* eslint jest/no-hooks: ["error", { "allow": ["afterEach"] }] */
+
+function setupFoo(options) {
+  /* ... */
+}
+
+let foo;
+
+beforeEach(() => {
+  foo = setupFoo();
+});
+
+afterEach(() => {
+  jest.resetModules();
+});
+
+test('foo does this', () => {
+  // ...
+});
+
+test('foo does that', () => {
+  // ...
+});
+```
+
+Examples of **correct** code for the `{ "allow": ["afterEach"] }` option:
+
+```js
+/* eslint jest/no-hooks: ["error", { "allow": ["afterEach"] }] */
+
+function setupFoo(options) {
+  /* ... */
+}
+
+afterEach(() => {
+  jest.resetModules();
+});
+
+test('foo does this', () => {
+  const foo = setupFoo();
+  // ...
+});
+
+test('foo does that', () => {
+  const foo = setupFoo();
+  // ...
+});
+```
+
+## When Not To Use It
+
+If you prefer using the setup and teardown hooks provided by Jest, you can
+safely disable this rule.
+
+## Further Reading
+
+- [Jest docs - Setup and Teardown](https://jestjs.io/docs/setup-teardown)

capabilities/testdrive-jsui/node_modules/eslint-plugin-jest/docs/rules/no-identical-title.md

@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
+# Disallow identical titles (`no-identical-title`)
+
+💼 This rule is enabled in the ✅ `recommended`
+[config](https://github.com/jest-community/eslint-plugin-jest/blob/main/README.md#shareable-configurations).
+
+<!-- end auto-generated rule header -->
+
+Having identical titles for two different tests or test suites may create
+confusion. For example, when a test with the same title as another test in the
+same test suite fails, it is harder to know which one failed and thus harder to
+fix.
+
+## Rule details
+
+This rule looks at the title of every test and test suite. It will report when
+two test suites or two test cases at the same level of a test suite have the
+same title.
+
+The following patterns are considered warnings:
+
+```js
+describe('foo', () => {
+  it('should do bar', () => {});
+  it('should do bar', () => {}); // Has the same title as the previous test
+
+  describe('baz', () => {
+    // ...
+  });
+
+  describe('baz', () => {
+    // Has the same title as a previous test suite
+    // ...
+  });
+});
+```
+
+These patterns would not be considered warnings:
+
+```js
+describe('foo', () => {
+  it('should do foo', () => {});
+  it('should do bar', () => {});
+
+  // Has the same name as a parent test suite, which is fine
+  describe('foo', () => {
+    // Has the same name as a test in a parent test suite, which is fine
+    it('should do foo', () => {});
+    it('should work', () => {});
+  });
+
+  describe('baz', () => {
+    // Has the same title as a previous test suite
+    // Has the same name as a test in a sibling test suite, which is fine
+    it('should work', () => {});
+  });
+});
+```

capabilities/testdrive-jsui/node_modules/eslint-plugin-jest/docs/rules/no-if.md

@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
+# Disallow conditional logic (`no-if`)
+
+❌ This rule is deprecated. It was replaced by
+[`jest/no-conditional-in-test`](no-conditional-in-test.md).
+
+<!-- end auto-generated rule header -->
+
+Conditional logic in tests is usually an indication that a test is attempting to
+cover too much, and not testing the logic it intends to. Each branch of code
+executing within an if statement will usually be better served by a test devoted
+to it.
+
+Conditionals are often used to satisfy the typescript type checker. In these
+cases, using the non-null assertion operator (!) would be best.
+
+## Rule details
+
+This rule prevents the use of if/ else statements and conditional (ternary)
+operations in tests.
+
+The following patterns are considered warnings:
+
+```js
+it('foo', () => {
+  if ('bar') {
+    // an if statement here is invalid
+    // you are probably testing too much
+  }
+});
+
+it('foo', () => {
+  const bar = foo ? 'bar' : null;
+});
+```
+
+These patterns would not be considered warnings:
+
+```js
+it('foo', () => {
+  // only test the 'foo' case
+});
+
+it('bar', () => {
+  // test the 'bar' case separately
+});
+
+it('foo', () => {
+  function foo(bar) {
+    // nested functions are valid
+    return foo ? bar : null;
+  }
+});
+```
+
+## When Not To Use It
+
+If you do not wish to prevent the use of if statements in tests, you can safely
+disable this rule.

capabilities/testdrive-jsui/node_modules/eslint-plugin-jest/docs/rules/no-interpolation-in-snapshots.md

@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
+# Disallow string interpolation inside snapshots (`no-interpolation-in-snapshots`)
+
+💼 This rule is enabled in the ✅ `recommended`
+[config](https://github.com/jest-community/eslint-plugin-jest/blob/main/README.md#shareable-configurations).
+
+<!-- end auto-generated rule header -->
+
+Prevents the use of string interpolations in snapshots.
+
+## Rule details
+
+Interpolation prevents snapshots from being updated. Instead, properties should
+be overloaded with a matcher by using
+[property matchers](https://jestjs.io/docs/en/snapshot-testing#property-matchers).
+
+Examples of **incorrect** code for this rule:
+
+```js
+expect(something).toMatchInlineSnapshot(
+  `Object {
+    property: ${interpolated}
+  }`,
+);
+
+expect(something).toMatchInlineSnapshot(
+  { other: expect.any(Number) },
+  `Object {
+    other: Any<Number>,
+    property: ${interpolated}
+  }`,
+);
+
+expect(errorThrowingFunction).toThrowErrorMatchingInlineSnapshot(
+  `${interpolated}`,
+);
+```
+
+Examples of **correct** code for this rule:
+
+```js
+expect(something).toMatchInlineSnapshot();
+
+expect(something).toMatchInlineSnapshot(
+  `Object {
+    property: 1
+  }`,
+);
+
+expect(something).toMatchInlineSnapshot(
+  { property: expect.any(Date) },
+  `Object {
+    property: Any<Date>
+  }`,
+);
+
+expect(errorThrowingFunction).toThrowErrorMatchingInlineSnapshot();
+
+expect(errorThrowingFunction).toThrowErrorMatchingInlineSnapshot(
+  `Error Message`,
+);
+```
+
+## When Not To Use It
+
+Don't use this rule on non-jest test files.

capabilities/testdrive-jsui/node_modules/eslint-plugin-jest/docs/rules/no-jasmine-globals.md

@@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
+# Disallow Jasmine globals (`no-jasmine-globals`)
+
+💼 This rule is enabled in the ✅ `recommended`
+[config](https://github.com/jest-community/eslint-plugin-jest/blob/main/README.md#shareable-configurations).
+
+🔧 This rule is automatically fixable by the
+[`--fix` CLI option](https://eslint.org/docs/latest/user-guide/command-line-interface#--fix).
+
+<!-- end auto-generated rule header -->
+
+`jest` uses `jasmine` as a test runner. A side effect of this is that both a
+`jasmine` object, and some jasmine-specific globals, are exposed to the test
+environment. Most functionality offered by Jasmine has been ported to Jest, and
+the Jasmine globals will stop working in the future. Developers should therefore
+migrate to Jest's documented API instead of relying on the undocumented Jasmine
+API.
+
+## Rule details
+
+This rule reports on any usage of Jasmine globals, which is not ported to Jest,
+and suggests alternatives from Jest's own API.
+
+## Examples
+
+The following patterns are considered warnings:
+
+```js
+jasmine.DEFAULT_TIMEOUT_INTERVAL = 5000;
+
+test('my test', () => {
+  pending();
+});
+
+test('my test', () => {
+  fail();
+});
+
+test('my test', () => {
+  spyOn(some, 'object');
+});
+
+test('my test', () => {
+  jasmine.createSpy();
+});
+
+test('my test', () => {
+  expect('foo').toEqual(jasmine.anything());
+});
+```
+
+The following patterns would not be considered warnings:
+
+```js
+jest.setTimeout(5000);
+
+test('my test', () => {
+  jest.spyOn(some, 'object');
+});
+
+test('my test', () => {
+  jest.fn();
+});
+
+test('my test', () => {
+  expect('foo').toEqual(expect.anything());
+});
+```

capabilities/testdrive-jsui/node_modules/eslint-plugin-jest/docs/rules/no-large-snapshots.md

@@ -0,0 +1,178 @@
+# Disallow large snapshots (`no-large-snapshots`)
+
+<!-- end auto-generated rule header -->
+
+When using Jest's snapshot capability one should be mindful of the size of
+created snapshots. As a general best practice snapshots should be limited in
+size in order to be more manageable and reviewable. A stored snapshot is only as
+good as its review and as such keeping it short, sweet, and readable is
+important to allow for thorough reviews.
+
+## Usage
+
+Because Jest snapshots are written with back-ticks (\` \`) which are only valid
+with
+[ES2015 onwards](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Template_literals)
+you should set `parserOptions` in your config to at least allow ES2015 in order
+to use this rule:
+
+```js
+module.exports = {
+  parserOptions: {
+    ecmaVersion: 2015,
+  },
+};
+```
+
+In order to check external snapshots, you must also have `eslint` check files
+with the `.snap` extension by either passing `--ext snap` on the command line or
+by explicitly specifying `.snap` in `overrides`.
+
+## Rule details
+
+This rule looks at all Jest inline and external snapshots (files with `.snap`
+extension) and validates that each stored snapshot within those files does not
+exceed 50 lines (by default, this is configurable as explained in `Options`
+section below).
+
+Example of **incorrect** code for this rule:
+
+```js
+exports[`a large snapshot 1`] = `
+line 1
+line 2
+line 3
+line 4
+line 5
+line 6
+line 7
+line 8
+line 9
+line 10
+line 11
+line 12
+line 13
+line 14
+line 15
+line 16
+line 17
+line 18
+line 19
+line 20
+line 21
+line 22
+line 23
+line 24
+line 25
+line 26
+line 27
+line 28
+line 29
+line 30
+line 31
+line 32
+line 33
+line 34
+line 35
+line 36
+line 37
+line 38
+line 39
+line 40
+line 41
+line 42
+line 43
+line 44
+line 45
+line 46
+line 47
+line 48
+line 49
+line 50
+line 51
+`;
+```
+
+Example of **correct** code for this rule:
+
+```js
+exports[`a more manageable and readable snapshot 1`] = `
+line 1
+line 2
+line 3
+line 4
+`;
+```
+
+## Options
+
+This rule has options for modifying the max number of lines allowed for a
+snapshot:
+
+In an `eslintrc` file:
+
+```json
+{
+  "rules": {
+    "jest/no-large-snapshots": ["warn", { "maxSize": 12, "inlineMaxSize": 6 }]
+  }
+}
+```
+
+Max number of lines allowed could be defined by snapshot type (Inline and
+External). Use `inlineMaxSize` for
+[Inline Snapshots](https://jestjs.io/docs/en/snapshot-testing#inline-snapshots)
+size and `maxSize` for
+[External Snapshots](https://jestjs.io/docs/en/snapshot-testing#snapshot-testing-with-jest).
+If only `maxSize` is provided on options, the value of `maxSize` will be used
+for both snapshot types (Inline and External).
+
+Since `eslint-disable` comments are not preserved by Jest when updating
+snapshots, you can use the `allowedSnapshots` option to have specific snapshots
+allowed regardless of their size.
+
+This option takes a map, with the key being the absolute filepath to a snapshot
+file, and the value an array of values made up of strings and regular
+expressions to compare to the names of the snapshots in the `.snap` file when
+checking if the snapshots size should be allowed.
+
+Note that regular expressions can only be passed in via `.eslintrc.js` as
+instances of `RegExp`.
+
+In an `.eslintrc.js` file:
+
+```javascript
+module.exports = {
+  rules: {
+    'jest/no-large-snapshots': [
+      'error',
+      {
+        allowedSnapshots: {
+          '/path/to/file.js.snap': ['snapshot name 1', /a big snapshot \d+/],
+        },
+      },
+    ],
+  },
+};
+```
+
+Since absolute paths are typically not very portable, you can use the builtin
+`path.resolve` function to expand relative paths into absolutes like so:
+
+```javascript
+const path = require('path');
+
+module.exports = {
+  rules: {
+    'jest/no-large-snapshots': [
+      'error',
+      {
+        allowedSnapshots: {
+          [path.resolve('test/__snapshots__/get.js.snap')]: ['full request'],
+          [path.resolve('test/__snapshots__/put.js.snap')]: ['full request'],
+        },
+      },
+    ],
+  },
+};
+```

capabilities/testdrive-jsui/node_modules/eslint-plugin-jest/docs/rules/no-mocks-import.md

@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
+# Disallow manually importing from `__mocks__` (`no-mocks-import`)
+
+💼 This rule is enabled in the ✅ `recommended`
+[config](https://github.com/jest-community/eslint-plugin-jest/blob/main/README.md#shareable-configurations).
+
+<!-- end auto-generated rule header -->
+
+When using `jest.mock`, your tests (just like the code being tested) should
+import from `./x`, not `./__mocks__/x`. Not following this rule can lead to
+confusion, because you will have multiple instances of the mocked module:
+
+```js
+jest.mock('./x');
+const x1 = require('./x');
+const x2 = require('./__mocks__/x');
+
+test('x', () => {
+  expect(x1).toBe(x2); // fails! They are both instances of `./__mocks__/x`, but not referentially equal
+});
+```
+
+## Rule details
+
+This rule reports imports from a path containing a `__mocks__` component.
+
+Example violations:
+
+```js
+import thing from './__mocks__/index';
+require('./__mocks__/index');
+require('__mocks__');
+```

capabilities/testdrive-jsui/node_modules/eslint-plugin-jest/docs/rules/no-restricted-jest-methods.md

@@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
+# Disallow specific `jest.` methods (`no-restricted-jest-methods`)
+
+<!-- end auto-generated rule header -->
+
+You may wish to restrict the use of specific `jest` methods.
+
+## Rule details
+
+This rule checks for the usage of specific methods on the `jest` object, which
+can be used to disallow certain patterns such as spies and mocks.
+
+## Options
+
+Restrictions are expressed in the form of a map, with the value being either a
+string message to be shown, or `null` if a generic default message should be
+used.
+
+By default, this map is empty, meaning no `jest` methods are banned.
+
+For example:
+
+```json
+{
+  "jest/no-restricted-jest-methods": [
+    "error",
+    {
+      "advanceTimersByTime": null,
+      "spyOn": "Don't use spies"
+    }
+  ]
+}
+```
+
+Examples of **incorrect** code for this rule with the above configuration
+
+```js
+jest.useFakeTimers();
+it('calls the callback after 1 second via advanceTimersByTime', () => {
+  // ...
+
+  jest.advanceTimersByTime(1000);
+
+  // ...
+});
+
+test('plays video', () => {
+  const spy = jest.spyOn(video, 'play');
+
+  // ...
+});
+```

capabilities/testdrive-jsui/node_modules/eslint-plugin-jest/docs/rules/no-restricted-matchers.md

@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
+# Disallow specific matchers & modifiers (`no-restricted-matchers`)
+
+<!-- end auto-generated rule header -->
+
+You may want to ban specific matchers & modifiers from being used.
+
+## Rule details
+
+This rule bans specific matchers & modifiers from being used, and can suggest
+alternatives.
+
+## Options
+
+Bans are expressed in the form of a map, with the value being either a string
+message to be shown, or `null` if the default rule message should be used.
+
+Bans are checked against the start of the `expect` chain - this means that to
+ban a specific matcher entirely you must specify all six permutations, but
+allows you to ban modifiers as well.
+
+By default, this map is empty, meaning no matchers or modifiers are banned.
+
+For example:
+
+```json
+{
+  "jest/no-restricted-matchers": [
+    "error",
+    {
+      "toBeFalsy": null,
+      "resolves": "Use `expect(await promise)` instead.",
+      "toHaveBeenCalledWith": null,
+      "not.toHaveBeenCalledWith": null,
+      "resolves.toHaveBeenCalledWith": null,
+      "rejects.toHaveBeenCalledWith": null,
+      "resolves.not.toHaveBeenCalledWith": null,
+      "rejects.not.toHaveBeenCalledWith": null
+    }
+  ]
+}
+```
+
+Examples of **incorrect** code for this rule with the above configuration
+
+```js
+it('is false', () => {
+  // if this has a modifer (i.e. `not.toBeFalsy`), it would be considered fine
+  expect(a).toBeFalsy();
+});
+
+it('resolves', async () => {
+  // all uses of this modifier are disallowed, regardless of matcher
+  await expect(myPromise()).resolves.toBe(true);
+});
+
+describe('when an error happens', () => {
+  it('does not upload the file', async () => {
+    // all uses of this matcher are disallowed
+    expect(uploadFileMock).not.toHaveBeenCalledWith('file.name');
+  });
+});
+```

capabilities/testdrive-jsui/node_modules/eslint-plugin-jest/docs/rules/no-standalone-expect.md

@@ -0,0 +1,104 @@
+# Disallow using `expect` outside of `it` or `test` blocks (`no-standalone-expect`)
+
+💼 This rule is enabled in the ✅ `recommended`
+[config](https://github.com/jest-community/eslint-plugin-jest/blob/main/README.md#shareable-configurations).
+
+<!-- end auto-generated rule header -->
+
+Prevents `expect` statements outside of a `test` or `it` block. An `expect`
+within a helper function (but outside of a `test` or `it` block) will not
+trigger this rule.
+
+## Rule details
+
+This rule aims to eliminate `expect` statements that will not be executed. An
+`expect` inside of a `describe` block but outside of a `test` or `it` block or
+outside a `describe` will not execute and therefore will trigger this rule. It
+is viable, however, to have an `expect` in a helper function that is called from
+within a `test` or `it` block so `expect` statements in a function will not
+trigger this rule.
+
+Statements like `expect.hasAssertions()` will NOT trigger this rule since these
+calls will execute if they are not in a test block.
+
+Examples of **incorrect** code for this rule:
+
+```js
+// in describe
+describe('a test', () => {
+  expect(1).toBe(1);
+});
+
+// below other tests
+describe('a test', () => {
+  it('an it', () => {
+    expect(1).toBe(1);
+  });
+
+  expect(1).toBe(1);
+});
+```
+
+Examples of **correct** code for this rule:
+
+```js
+// in it block
+describe('a test', () => {
+  it('an it', () => {
+    expect(1).toBe(1);
+  });
+});
+
+// in helper function
+describe('a test', () => {
+  const helper = () => {
+    expect(1).toBe(1);
+  };
+
+  it('an it', () => {
+    helper();
+  });
+});
+
+describe('a test', () => {
+  expect.hasAssertions(1);
+});
+```
+
+\*Note that this rule will not trigger if the helper function is never used even
+though the `expect` will not execute. Rely on a rule like no-unused-vars for
+this case.
+
+### Options
+
+#### `additionalTestBlockFunctions`
+
+This array can be used to specify the names of functions that should also be
+treated as test blocks:
+
+```json
+{
+  "rules": {
+    "jest/no-standalone-expect": [
+      "error",
+      { "additionalTestBlockFunctions": ["each.test"] }
+    ]
+  }
+}
+```
+
+The following is _correct_ when using the above configuration:
+
+```js
+each([
+  [1, 1, 2],
+  [1, 2, 3],
+  [2, 1, 3],
+]).test('returns the result of adding %d to %d', (a, b, expected) => {
+  expect(a + b).toBe(expected);
+});
+```
+
+## When Not To Use It
+
+Don't use this rule on non-jest test files.

capabilities/testdrive-jsui/node_modules/eslint-plugin-jest/docs/rules/no-test-prefixes.md

@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
+# Require using `.only` and `.skip` over `f` and `x` (`no-test-prefixes`)
+
+💼 This rule is enabled in the ✅ `recommended`
+[config](https://github.com/jest-community/eslint-plugin-jest/blob/main/README.md#shareable-configurations).
+
+🔧 This rule is automatically fixable by the
+[`--fix` CLI option](https://eslint.org/docs/latest/user-guide/command-line-interface#--fix).
+
+<!-- end auto-generated rule header -->
+
+Jest allows you to choose how you want to define focused and skipped tests, with
+multiple permutations for each:
+
+- **only & skip:** `it.only`, `test.only`, `describe.only`, `it.skip`,
+  `test.skip`, `describe.skip`.
+- **'f' & 'x':** `fit`, `fdescribe`, `xit`, `xtest`, `xdescribe`.
+
+This rule enforces usages from the **only & skip** list.
+
+## Rule details
+
+This rule triggers a warning if you use one of the keywords from the **'f' &
+'x'** list to focus/skip a test.
+
+```js
+/*eslint jest/no-test-prefixes: "error"*/
+
+it.only('foo'); // valid
+test.only('foo'); // valid
+describe.only('foo'); // valid
+it.skip('foo'); // valid
+test.skip('foo'); // valid
+describe.skip('foo'); // valid
+
+fit('foo'); // invalid
+fdescribe('foo'); // invalid
+xit('foo'); // invalid
+xtest('foo'); // invalid
+xdescribe('foo'); // invalid
+```

capabilities/testdrive-jsui/node_modules/eslint-plugin-jest/docs/rules/no-test-return-statement.md

@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
+# Disallow explicitly returning from tests (`no-test-return-statement`)
+
+<!-- end auto-generated rule header -->
+
+Tests in Jest should be void and not return values.
+
+If you are returning Promises then you should update the test to use
+`async/await`.
+
+## Rule details
+
+This rule triggers a warning if you use a return statement inside a test body.
+
+```js
+/*eslint jest/no-test-return-statement: "error"*/
+
+// valid:
+
+it('noop', function () {});
+
+test('noop', () => {});
+
+test('one arrow', () => expect(1).toBe(1));
+
+test('empty');
+
+test('one', () => {
+  expect(1).toBe(1);
+});
+
+it('one', function () {
+  expect(1).toBe(1);
+});
+
+it('returning a promise', async () => {
+  await new Promise(res => setTimeout(res, 100));
+  expect(1).toBe(1);
+});
+
+// invalid:
+test('return an expect', () => {
+  return expect(1).toBe(1);
+});
+
+it('returning a promise', function () {
+  return new Promise(res => setTimeout(res, 100)).then(() => expect(1).toBe(1));
+});
+```

capabilities/testdrive-jsui/node_modules/eslint-plugin-jest/docs/rules/no-untyped-mock-factory.md

@@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
+# Disallow using `jest.mock()` factories without an explicit type parameter (`no-untyped-mock-factory`)
+
+🔧 This rule is automatically fixable by the
+[`--fix` CLI option](https://eslint.org/docs/latest/user-guide/command-line-interface#--fix).
+
+<!-- end auto-generated rule header -->
+
+By default, `jest.mock` and `jest.doMock` allow any type to be returned by a
+mock factory. A generic type parameter can be used to enforce that the factory
+returns an object with the same shape as the original module, or some other
+strict type. Requiring a type makes it easier to use TypeScript to catch changes
+needed in test mocks when the source module changes.
+
+> **Warning**
+>
+> This rule expects to be run on TypeScript files **only**. If you are using a
+> codebase that has a mix of JavaScript and TypeScript tests, you can use
+> [overrides](https://eslint.org/docs/latest/user-guide/configuring/configuration-files#how-do-overrides-work)
+> to apply this rule to just your TypeScript test files.
+
+## Rule details
+
+This rule triggers a warning if `mock()` or `doMock()` is used without a generic
+type parameter or return type.
+
+The following patterns are considered errors:
+
+```ts
+jest.mock('../moduleName', () => {
+  return jest.fn(() => 42);
+});
+
+jest.mock('./module', () => ({
+  ...jest.requireActual('./module'),
+  foo: jest.fn(),
+}));
+
+jest.mock('random-num', () => {
+  return jest.fn(() => 42);
+});
+```
+
+The following patterns are not considered errors:
+
+```ts
+// Uses typeof import()
+jest.mock<typeof import('../moduleName')>('../moduleName', () => {
+  return jest.fn(() => 42);
+});
+
+jest.mock<typeof import('./module')>('./module', () => ({
+  ...jest.requireActual('./module'),
+  foo: jest.fn(),
+}));
+
+// Uses custom type
+jest.mock<() => number>('random-num', () => {
+  return jest.fn(() => 42);
+});
+
+// No factory
+jest.mock('random-num');
+
+// Virtual mock
+jest.mock(
+  '../moduleName',
+  () => {
+    return jest.fn(() => 42);
+  },
+  { virtual: true },
+);
+```

capabilities/testdrive-jsui/node_modules/eslint-plugin-jest/docs/rules/prefer-called-with.md

@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+# Suggest using `toBeCalledWith()` or `toHaveBeenCalledWith()` (`prefer-called-with`)
+
+<!-- end auto-generated rule header -->
+
+The `toBeCalled()` matcher is used to assert that a mock function has been
+called one or more times, without checking the arguments passed. The assertion
+is stronger when arguments are also validated using the `toBeCalledWith()`
+matcher. When some arguments are difficult to check, using generic match like
+`expect.anything()` at least enforces number and position of arguments.
+
+This rule warns if the form without argument checking is used, except for `.not`
+enforcing a function has never been called.
+
+## Rule details
+
+The following patterns are warnings:
+
+```js
+expect(someFunction).toBeCalled();
+
+expect(someFunction).toHaveBeenCalled();
+```
+
+The following patterns are not warnings:
+
+```js
+expect(noArgsFunction).toBeCalledWith();
+
+expect(roughArgsFunction).toBeCalledWith(expect.anything(), expect.any(Date));
+
+expect(anyArgsFunction).toBeCalledTimes(1);
+
+expect(uncalledFunction).not.toBeCalled();
+```

capabilities/testdrive-jsui/node_modules/eslint-plugin-jest/docs/rules/prefer-comparison-matcher.md

@@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
+# Suggest using the built-in comparison matchers (`prefer-comparison-matcher`)
+
+🔧 This rule is automatically fixable by the
+[`--fix` CLI option](https://eslint.org/docs/latest/user-guide/command-line-interface#--fix).
+
+<!-- end auto-generated rule header -->
+
+Jest has a number of built-in matchers for comparing numbers, which allow for
+more readable tests and error messages if an expectation fails.
+
+## Rule details
+
+This rule checks for comparisons in tests that could be replaced with one of the
+following built-in comparison matchers:
+
+- `toBeGreaterThan`
+- `toBeGreaterThanOrEqual`
+- `toBeLessThan`
+- `toBeLessThanOrEqual`
+
+Examples of **incorrect** code for this rule:
+
+```js
+expect(x > 5).toBe(true);
+expect(x < 7).not.toEqual(true);
+expect(x <= y).toStrictEqual(true);
+```
+
+Examples of **correct** code for this rule:
+
+```js
+expect(x).toBeGreaterThan(5);
+expect(x).not.toBeLessThanOrEqual(7);
+expect(x).toBeLessThanOrEqual(y);
+
+// special case - see below
+expect(x < 'Carl').toBe(true);
+```
+
+Note that these matchers only work with numbers and bigints, and that the rule
+assumes that any variables on either side of the comparison operator are of one
+of those types - this means if you're using the comparison operator with
+strings, the fix applied by this rule will result in an error.
+
+```js
+expect(myName).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(theirName); // Matcher error: received value must be a number or bigint
+```
+
+The reason for this is that comparing strings with these operators is expected
+to be very rare and would mean not being able to have an automatic fixer for
+this rule.
+
+If for some reason you are using these operators to compare strings, you can
+disable this rule using an inline
+[configuration comment](https://eslint.org/docs/user-guide/configuring/rules#disabling-rules):
+
+```js
+// eslint-disable-next-line jest/prefer-comparison-matcher
+expect(myName > theirName).toBe(true);
+```

capabilities/testdrive-jsui/node_modules/eslint-plugin-jest/docs/rules/prefer-each.md

@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
+# Prefer using `.each` rather than manual loops (`prefer-each`)
+
+<!-- end auto-generated rule header -->
+
+Reports where you might be able to use `.each` instead of native loops.
+
+## Rule details
+
+This rule triggers a warning if you use test case functions like `describe`,
+`test`, and `it`, in a native loop - generally you should be able to use `.each`
+instead which gives better output and makes it easier to run specific cases.
+
+Examples of **incorrect** code for this rule:
+
+```js
+for (const number of getNumbers()) {
+  it('is greater than five', function () {
+    expect(number).toBeGreaterThan(5);
+  });
+}
+
+for (const [input, expected] of data) {
+  beforeEach(() => setupSomething(input));
+
+  test(`results in ${expected}`, () => {
+    expect(doSomething()).toBe(expected);
+  });
+}
+```
+
+Examples of **correct** code for this rule:
+
+```js
+it.each(getNumbers())(
+  'only returns numbers that are greater than seven',
+  number => {
+    expect(number).toBeGreaterThan(7);
+  },
+);
+
+describe.each(data)('when input is %s', ([input, expected]) => {
+  beforeEach(() => setupSomething(input));
+
+  test(`results in ${expected}`, () => {
+    expect(doSomething()).toBe(expected);
+  });
+});
+
+// we don't warn on loops _in_ test functions because those typically involve
+// complex setup that is better done in the test function itself
+it('returns numbers that are greater than five', () => {
+  for (const number of getNumbers()) {
+    expect(number).toBeGreaterThan(5);
+  }
+});
+```

capabilities/testdrive-jsui/node_modules/eslint-plugin-jest/docs/rules/prefer-equality-matcher.md

@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+# Suggest using the built-in equality matchers (`prefer-equality-matcher`)
+
+💡 This rule is manually fixable by
+[editor suggestions](https://eslint.org/docs/developer-guide/working-with-rules#providing-suggestions).
+
+<!-- end auto-generated rule header -->
+
+Jest has built-in matchers for expecting equality, which allow for more readable
+tests and error messages if an expectation fails.
+
+## Rule details
+
+This rule checks for _strict_ equality checks (`===` & `!==`) in tests that
+could be replaced with one of the following built-in equality matchers:
+
+- `toBe`
+- `toEqual`
+- `toStrictEqual`
+
+Examples of **incorrect** code for this rule:
+
+```js
+expect(x === 5).toBe(true);
+expect(name === 'Carl').not.toEqual(true);
+expect(myObj !== thatObj).toStrictEqual(true);
+```
+
+Examples of **correct** code for this rule:
+
+```js
+expect(x).toBe(5);
+expect(name).not.toEqual('Carl');
+expect(myObj).toStrictEqual(thatObj);
+```

capabilities/testdrive-jsui/node_modules/eslint-plugin-jest/docs/rules/prefer-expect-assertions.md

@@ -0,0 +1,228 @@
+# Suggest using `expect.assertions()` OR `expect.hasAssertions()` (`prefer-expect-assertions`)
+
+💡 This rule is manually fixable by
+[editor suggestions](https://eslint.org/docs/developer-guide/working-with-rules#providing-suggestions).
+
+<!-- end auto-generated rule header -->
+
+Ensure every test to have either `expect.assertions(<number of assertions>)` OR
+`expect.hasAssertions()` as its first expression.
+
+## Rule details
+
+This rule triggers a warning if,
+
+- `expect.assertions(<number of assertions>)` OR `expect.hasAssertions()` is not
+  present as first statement in a test, e.g.:
+
+```js
+test('my test', () => {
+  expect(someThing()).toEqual('foo');
+});
+```
+
+- `expect.assertions(<number of assertions>)` is the first statement in a test
+  where argument passed to `expect.assertions(<number of assertions>)` is not a
+  valid number, e.g.:
+
+```js
+test('my test', () => {
+  expect.assertions('1');
+  expect(someThing()).toEqual('foo');
+});
+```
+
+The following patterns are considered warnings:
+
+```js
+test('my test', () => {
+  expect.assertions('1');
+  expect(someThing()).toEqual('foo');
+});
+
+test('my test', () => {
+  expect(someThing()).toEqual('foo');
+});
+```
+
+The following patterns would not be considered warnings:
+
+```js
+test('my test', () => {
+  expect.assertions(1);
+  expect(someThing()).toEqual('foo');
+});
+
+test('my test', () => {
+  expect.hasAssertions();
+  expect(someThing()).toEqual('foo');
+});
+```
+
+## Options
+
+This rule can be configured to only check tests that match certain patterns that
+typically look like `expect` calls might be missed, such as in promises or
+loops.
+
+By default, none of these options are enabled meaning the rule checks _every_
+test for a call to either `expect.hasAssertions` or `expect.assertions`. If any
+of the options are enabled the rule checks any test that matches _at least one_
+of the patterns represented by the enabled options (think "OR" rather than
+"AND").
+
+#### `onlyFunctionsWithAsyncKeyword`
+
+When `true`, this rule will only warn for tests that use the `async` keyword.
+
+```json
+{
+  "rules": {
+    "jest/prefer-expect-assertions": [
+      "warn",
+      { "onlyFunctionsWithAsyncKeyword": true }
+    ]
+  }
+}
+```
+
+When `onlyFunctionsWithAsyncKeyword` option is set to `true`, the following
+pattern would be a warning:
+
+```js
+test('my test', async () => {
+  const result = await someAsyncFunc();
+  expect(result).toBe('foo');
+});
+```
+
+While the following patterns would not be considered warnings:
+
+```js
+test('my test', () => {
+  const result = someFunction();
+  expect(result).toBe('foo');
+});
+
+test('my test', async () => {
+  expect.assertions(1);
+  const result = await someAsyncFunc();
+  expect(result).toBe('foo');
+});
+```
+
+#### `onlyFunctionsWithExpectInLoop`
+
+When `true`, this rule will only warn for tests that have `expect` calls within
+a native loop.
+
+```json
+{
+  "rules": {
+    "jest/prefer-expect-assertions": [
+      "warn",
+      { "onlyFunctionsWithExpectInLoop": true }
+    ]
+  }
+}
+```
+
+Examples of **incorrect** code when `'onlyFunctionsWithExpectInLoop'` is `true`:
+
+```js
+describe('getNumbers', () => {
+  it('only returns numbers that are greater than zero', () => {
+    const numbers = getNumbers();
+
+    for (const number in numbers) {
+      expect(number).toBeGreaterThan(0);
+    }
+  });
+});
+```
+
+Examples of **correct** code when `'onlyFunctionsWithExpectInLoop'` is `true`:
+
+```js
+describe('getNumbers', () => {
+  it('only returns numbers that are greater than zero', () => {
+    expect.hasAssertions();
+
+    const numbers = getNumbers();
+
+    for (const number in numbers) {
+      expect(number).toBeGreaterThan(0);
+    }
+  });
+
+  it('returns more than one number', () => {
+    expect(getNumbers().length).toBeGreaterThan(1);
+  });
+});
+```
+
+#### `onlyFunctionsWithExpectInCallback`
+
+When `true`, this rule will only warn for tests that have `expect` calls within
+a callback.
+
+```json
+{
+  "rules": {
+    "jest/prefer-expect-assertions": [
+      "warn",
+      { "onlyFunctionsWithExpectInCallback": true }
+    ]
+  }
+}
+```
+
+Examples of **incorrect** code when `'onlyFunctionsWithExpectInCallback'` is
+`true`:
+
+```js
+describe('getNumbers', () => {
+  it('only returns numbers that are greater than zero', () => {
+    const numbers = getNumbers();
+
+    getNumbers().forEach(number => {
+      expect(number).toBeGreaterThan(0);
+    });
+  });
+});
+
+describe('/users', () => {
+  it.each([1, 2, 3])('returns ok', id => {
+    client.get(`/users/${id}`, response => {
+      expect(response.status).toBe(200);
+    });
+  });
+});
+```
+
+Examples of **correct** code when `'onlyFunctionsWithExpectInCallback'` is
+`true`:
+
+```js
+describe('getNumbers', () => {
+  it('only returns numbers that are greater than zero', () => {
+    expect.hasAssertions();
+
+    const numbers = getNumbers();
+
+    getNumbers().forEach(number => {
+      expect(number).toBeGreaterThan(0);
+    });
+  });
+});
+
+describe('/users', () => {
+  it.each([1, 2, 3])('returns ok', id => {
+    expect.assertions(1);
+
+    client.get(`/users/${id}`, response => {
+      expect(response.status).toBe(200);
+    });
+  });
+});
+```

capabilities/testdrive-jsui/node_modules/eslint-plugin-jest/docs/rules/prefer-expect-resolves.md

@@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
+# Prefer `await expect(...).resolves` over `expect(await ...)` syntax (`prefer-expect-resolves`)
+
+🔧 This rule is automatically fixable by the
+[`--fix` CLI option](https://eslint.org/docs/latest/user-guide/command-line-interface#--fix).
+
+<!-- end auto-generated rule header -->
+
+When working with promises, there are two primary ways you can test the resolved
+value:
+
+1. use the `resolve` modifier on `expect`
+   (`await expect(...).resolves.<matcher>` style)
+2. `await` the promise and assert against its result
+   (`expect(await ...).<matcher>` style)
+
+While the second style is arguably less dependent on `jest`, if the promise
+rejects it will be treated as a general error, resulting in less predictable
+behaviour and output from `jest`.
+
+Additionally, favoring the first style ensures consistency with its `rejects`
+counterpart, as there is no way of "awaiting" a rejection.
+
+## Rule details
+
+This rule triggers a warning if an `await` is done within an `expect`, and
+recommends using `resolves` instead.
+
+Examples of **incorrect** code for this rule
+
+```js
+it('passes', async () => {
+  expect(await someValue()).toBe(true);
+});
+
+it('is true', async () => {
+  const myPromise = Promise.resolve(true);
+
+  expect(await myPromise).toBe(true);
+});
+```
+
+Examples of **correct** code for this rule
+
+```js
+it('passes', async () => {
+  await expect(someValue()).resolves.toBe(true);
+});
+
+it('is true', async () => {
+  const myPromise = Promise.resolve(true);
+
+  await expect(myPromise).resolves.toBe(true);
+});
+
+it('errors', async () => {
+  await expect(Promise.reject(new Error('oh noes!'))).rejects.toThrowError(
+    'oh noes!',
+  );
+});
+```

capabilities/testdrive-jsui/node_modules/eslint-plugin-jest/docs/rules/prefer-hooks-in-order.md

@@ -0,0 +1,135 @@
+# Prefer having hooks in a consistent order (`prefer-hooks-in-order`)
+
+<!-- end auto-generated rule header -->
+
+While hooks can be setup in any order, they're always called by `jest` in this
+specific order:
+
+1. `beforeAll`
+1. `beforeEach`
+1. `afterEach`
+1. `afterAll`
+
+This rule aims to make that more obvious by enforcing grouped hooks be setup in
+that order within tests.
+
+## Rule details
+
+Examples of **incorrect** code for this rule
+
+```js
+/* eslint jest/prefer-hooks-in-order: "error" */
+
+describe('foo', () => {
+  beforeEach(() => {
+    seedMyDatabase();
+  });
+
+  beforeAll(() => {
+    createMyDatabase();
+  });
+
+  it('accepts this input', () => {
+    // ...
+  });
+
+  it('returns that value', () => {
+    // ...
+  });
+
+  describe('when the database has specific values', () => {
+    const specificValue = '...';
+
+    beforeEach(() => {
+      seedMyDatabase(specificValue);
+    });
+
+    it('accepts that input', () => {
+      // ...
+    });
+
+    it('throws an error', () => {
+      // ...
+    });
+
+    afterEach(() => {
+      clearLogger();
+    });
+    beforeEach(() => {
+      mockLogger();
+    });
+
+    it('logs a message', () => {
+      // ...
+    });
+  });
+
+  afterAll(() => {
+    removeMyDatabase();
+  });
+});
+```
+
+Examples of **correct** code for this rule
+
+```js
+/* eslint jest/prefer-hooks-in-order: "error" */
+
+describe('foo', () => {
+  beforeAll(() => {
+    createMyDatabase();
+  });
+
+  beforeEach(() => {
+    seedMyDatabase();
+  });
+
+  it('accepts this input', () => {
+    // ...
+  });
+
+  it('returns that value', () => {
+    // ...
+  });
+
+  describe('when the database has specific values', () => {
+    const specificValue = '...';
+
+    beforeEach(() => {
+      seedMyDatabase(specificValue);
+    });
+
+    it('accepts that input', () => {
+      // ...
+    });
+
+    it('throws an error', () => {
+      // ...
+    });
+
+    beforeEach(() => {
+      mockLogger();
+    });
+
+    afterEach(() => {
+      clearLogger();
+    });
+
+    it('logs a message', () => {
+      // ...
+    });
+  });
+
+  afterAll(() => {
+    removeMyDatabase();
+  });
+});
+```
+
+## Also See
+
+- [`prefer-hooks-on-top`](prefer-hooks-on-top.md)
+
+## Further Reading
+
+- [Order of Execution](https://jestjs.io/docs/setup-teardown#order-of-execution)

capabilities/testdrive-jsui/node_modules/eslint-plugin-jest/docs/rules/prefer-hooks-on-top.md

@@ -0,0 +1,122 @@
+# Suggest having hooks before any test cases (`prefer-hooks-on-top`)
+
+<!-- end auto-generated rule header -->
+
+While hooks can be setup anywhere in a test file, they are always called in a
+specific order, which means it can be confusing if they're intermixed with test
+cases.
+
+This rule helps to ensure that hooks are always defined before test cases.
+
+## Rule details
+
+Examples of **incorrect** code for this rule
+
+```js
+/* eslint jest/prefer-hooks-on-top: "error" */
+
+describe('foo', () => {
+  beforeEach(() => {
+    seedMyDatabase();
+  });
+
+  it('accepts this input', () => {
+    // ...
+  });
+
+  beforeAll(() => {
+    createMyDatabase();
+  });
+
+  it('returns that value', () => {
+    // ...
+  });
+
+  describe('when the database has specific values', () => {
+    const specificValue = '...';
+
+    beforeEach(() => {
+      seedMyDatabase(specificValue);
+    });
+
+    it('accepts that input', () => {
+      // ...
+    });
+
+    it('throws an error', () => {
+      // ...
+    });
+
+    afterEach(() => {
+      clearLogger();
+    });
+    beforeEach(() => {
+      mockLogger();
+    });
+
+    it('logs a message', () => {
+      // ...
+    });
+  });
+
+  afterAll(() => {
+    removeMyDatabase();
+  });
+});
+```
+
+Examples of **correct** code for this rule
+
+```js
+/* eslint jest/prefer-hooks-on-top: "error" */
+
+describe('foo', () => {
+  beforeAll(() => {
+    createMyDatabase();
+  });
+
+  beforeEach(() => {
+    seedMyDatabase();
+  });
+
+  afterAll(() => {
+    clearMyDatabase();
+  });
+
+  it('accepts this input', () => {
+    // ...
+  });
+
+  it('returns that value', () => {
+    // ...
+  });
+
+  describe('when the database has specific values', () => {
+    const specificValue = '...';
+
+    beforeEach(() => {
+      seedMyDatabase(specificValue);
+    });
+
+    beforeEach(() => {
+      mockLogger();
+    });
+
+    afterEach(() => {
+      clearLogger();
+    });
+
+    it('accepts that input', () => {
+      // ...
+    });
+
+    it('throws an error', () => {
+      // ...
+    });
+
+    it('logs a message', () => {
+      // ...
+    });
+  });
+});
+```

capabilities/testdrive-jsui/node_modules/eslint-plugin-jest/docs/rules/prefer-lowercase-title.md

@@ -0,0 +1,111 @@
+# Enforce lowercase test names (`prefer-lowercase-title`)
+
+🔧 This rule is automatically fixable by the
+[`--fix` CLI option](https://eslint.org/docs/latest/user-guide/command-line-interface#--fix).
+
+<!-- end auto-generated rule header -->
+
+## Rule details
+
+Enforce `it`, `test` and `describe` to have descriptions that begin with a
+lowercase letter. This provides more readable test failures. This rule is not
+enabled by default.
+
+The following pattern is considered a warning:
+
+```js
+it('Adds 1 + 2 to equal 3', () => {
+  expect(sum(1, 2)).toBe(3);
+});
+```
+
+The following pattern is not considered a warning:
+
+```js
+it('adds 1 + 2 to equal 3', () => {
+  expect(sum(1, 2)).toBe(3);
+});
+```
+
+## Options
+
+```json
+{
+  "jest/prefer-lowercase-title": [
+    "error",
+    {
+      "ignore": ["describe", "test"]
+    }
+  ]
+}
+```
+
+### `ignore`
+
+This array option controls which Jest functions are checked by this rule. There
+are three possible values:
+
+- `"describe"`
+- `"test"`
+- `"it"`
+
+By default, none of these options are enabled (the equivalent of
+`{ "ignore": [] }`).
+
+Example of **correct** code for the `{ "ignore": ["describe"] }` option:
+
+```js
+/* eslint jest/prefer-lowercase-title: ["error", { "ignore": ["describe"] }] */
+
+describe('Uppercase description');
+```
+
+Example of **correct** code for the `{ "ignore": ["test"] }` option:
+
+```js
+/* eslint jest/prefer-lowercase-title: ["error", { "ignore": ["test"] }] */
+
+test('Uppercase description');
+```
+
+Example of **correct** code for the `{ "ignore": ["it"] }` option:
+
+```js
+/* eslint jest/prefer-lowercase-title: ["error", { "ignore": ["it"] }] */
+
+it('Uppercase description');
+```
+
+### `allowedPrefixes`
+
+This array option allows specifying prefixes, which contain capitals that titles
+can start with. This can be useful when writing tests for API endpoints, where
+you'd like to prefix with the HTTP method.
+
+By default, nothing is allowed (the equivalent of `{ "allowedPrefixes": [] }`).
+
+Example of **correct** code for the `{ "allowedPrefixes": ["GET"] }` option:
+
+```js
+/* eslint jest/prefer-lowercase-title: ["error", { "allowedPrefixes": ["GET"] }] */
+
+describe('GET /live');
+```
+
+### `ignoreTopLevelDescribe`
+
+This option can be set to allow only the top-level `describe` blocks to have a
+title starting with an upper-case letter.
+
+Example of **correct** code for the `{ "ignoreTopLevelDescribe": true }` option:
+
+```js
+/* eslint jest/prefer-lowercase-title: ["error", { "ignoreTopLevelDescribe": true }] */
+describe('MyClass', () => {
+  describe('#myMethod', () => {
+    it('does things', () => {
+      //
+    });
+  });
+});
+```

capabilities/testdrive-jsui/node_modules/eslint-plugin-jest/docs/rules/prefer-mock-promise-shorthand.md

@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+# Prefer mock resolved/rejected shorthands for promises (`prefer-mock-promise-shorthand`)
+
+🔧 This rule is automatically fixable by the
+[`--fix` CLI option](https://eslint.org/docs/latest/user-guide/command-line-interface#--fix).
+
+<!-- end auto-generated rule header -->
+
+When working with mocks of functions that return promises, Jest provides some
+API sugar functions to reduce the amount of boilerplate you have to write.
+
+These methods should be preferred when possible.
+
+## Rule details
+
+The following patterns are warnings:
+
+```js
+jest.fn().mockImplementation(() => Promise.resolve(123));
+jest
+  .spyOn(fs.promises, 'readFile')
+  .mockReturnValue(Promise.reject(new Error('oh noes!')));
+
+myFunction
+  .mockReturnValueOnce(Promise.resolve(42))
+  .mockImplementationOnce(() => Promise.resolve(42))
+  .mockReturnValue(Promise.reject(new Error('too many calls!')));
+```
+
+The following patterns are not warnings:
+
+```js
+jest.fn().mockResolvedValue(123);
+jest.spyOn(fs.promises, 'readFile').mockRejectedValue(new Error('oh noes!'));
+
+myFunction
+  .mockResolvedValueOnce(42)
+  .mockResolvedValueOnce(42)
+  .mockRejectedValue(new Error('too many calls!'));
+```

capabilities/testdrive-jsui/node_modules/eslint-plugin-jest/docs/rules/prefer-snapshot-hint.md

@@ -0,0 +1,190 @@
+# Prefer including a hint with external snapshots (`prefer-snapshot-hint`)
+
+<!-- end auto-generated rule header -->
+
+When working with external snapshot matchers it's considered best practice to
+provide a hint (as the last argument to the matcher) describing the expected
+snapshot content that will be included in the snapshots name by Jest.
+
+This makes it easier for reviewers to verify the snapshots during review, and
+for anyone to know whether an outdated snapshot is the correct behavior before
+updating.
+
+## Rule details
+
+This rule looks for any use of an external snapshot matcher (e.g.
+`toMatchSnapshot` and `toThrowErrorMatchingSnapshot`) and checks if they include
+a snapshot hint.
+
+## Options
+
+### `'always'`
+
+Require a hint to _always_ be provided when using external snapshot matchers.
+
+Examples of **incorrect** code for the `'always'` option:
+
+```js
+const snapshotOutput = ({ stdout, stderr }) => {
+  expect(stdout).toMatchSnapshot();
+  expect(stderr).toMatchSnapshot();
+};
+
+describe('cli', () => {
+  describe('--version flag', () => {
+    it('prints the version', async () => {
+      snapshotOutput(await runCli(['--version']));
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('--config flag', () => {
+    it('reads the config', async () => {
+      const { stdout, parsedConfig } = await runCli([
+        '--config',
+        'jest.config.js',
+      ]);
+
+      expect(stdout).toMatchSnapshot();
+      expect(parsedConfig).toMatchSnapshot();
+    });
+
+    it('prints nothing to stderr', async () => {
+      const { stderr } = await runCli(['--config', 'jest.config.js']);
+
+      expect(stderr).toMatchSnapshot();
+    });
+
+    describe('when the file does not exist', () => {
+      it('throws an error', async () => {
+        await expect(
+          runCli(['--config', 'does-not-exist.js']),
+        ).rejects.toThrowErrorMatchingSnapshot();
+      });
+    });
+  });
+});
+```
+
+Examples of **correct** code for the `'always'` option:
+
+```js
+const snapshotOutput = ({ stdout, stderr }, hints) => {
+  expect(stdout).toMatchSnapshot({}, `stdout: ${hints.stdout}`);
+  expect(stderr).toMatchSnapshot({}, `stderr: ${hints.stderr}`);
+};
+
+describe('cli', () => {
+  describe('--version flag', () => {
+    it('prints the version', async () => {
+      snapshotOutput(await runCli(['--version']), {
+        stdout: 'version string',
+        stderr: 'empty',
+      });
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('--config flag', () => {
+    it('reads the config', async () => {
+      const { stdout } = await runCli(['--config', 'jest.config.js']);
+
+      expect(stdout).toMatchSnapshot({}, 'stdout: config settings');
+    });
+
+    it('prints nothing to stderr', async () => {
+      const { stderr } = await runCli(['--config', 'jest.config.js']);
+
+      expect(stderr).toMatchInlineSnapshot();
+    });
+
+    describe('when the file does not exist', () => {
+      it('throws an error', async () => {
+        await expect(
+          runCli(['--config', 'does-not-exist.js']),
+        ).rejects.toThrowErrorMatchingSnapshot('stderr: config error');
+      });
+    });
+  });
+});
+```
+
+### `'multi'` (default)
+
+Require a hint to be provided when there are multiple external snapshot matchers
+within the scope (meaning it includes nested calls).
+
+Examples of **incorrect** code for the `'multi'` option:
+
+```js
+const snapshotOutput = ({ stdout, stderr }) => {
+  expect(stdout).toMatchSnapshot();
+  expect(stderr).toMatchSnapshot();
+};
+
+describe('cli', () => {
+  describe('--version flag', () => {
+    it('prints the version', async () => {
+      snapshotOutput(await runCli(['--version']));
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('--config flag', () => {
+    it('reads the config', async () => {
+      const { stdout, parsedConfig } = await runCli([
+        '--config',
+        'jest.config.js',
+      ]);
+
+      expect(stdout).toMatchSnapshot();
+      expect(parsedConfig).toMatchSnapshot();
+    });
+
+    it('prints nothing to stderr', async () => {
+      const { stderr } = await runCli(['--config', 'jest.config.js']);
+
+      expect(stderr).toMatchSnapshot();
+    });
+  });
+});
+```
+
+Examples of **correct** code for the `'multi'` option:
+
+```js
+const snapshotOutput = ({ stdout, stderr }, hints) => {
+  expect(stdout).toMatchSnapshot({}, `stdout: ${hints.stdout}`);
+  expect(stderr).toMatchSnapshot({}, `stderr: ${hints.stderr}`);
+};
+
+describe('cli', () => {
+  describe('--version flag', () => {
+    it('prints the version', async () => {
+      snapshotOutput(await runCli(['--version']), {
+        stdout: 'version string',
+        stderr: 'empty',
+      });
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('--config flag', () => {
+    it('reads the config', async () => {
+      const { stdout } = await runCli(['--config', 'jest.config.js']);
+
+      expect(stdout).toMatchSnapshot();
+    });
+
+    it('prints nothing to stderr', async () => {
+      const { stderr } = await runCli(['--config', 'jest.config.js']);
+
+      expect(stderr).toMatchInlineSnapshot();
+    });
+
+    describe('when the file does not exist', () => {
+      it('throws an error', async () => {
+        await expect(
+          runCli(['--config', 'does-not-exist.js']),
+        ).rejects.toThrowErrorMatchingSnapshot();
+      });
+    });
+  });
+});
+```

capabilities/testdrive-jsui/node_modules/eslint-plugin-jest/docs/rules/prefer-spy-on.md

@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+# Suggest using `jest.spyOn()` (`prefer-spy-on`)
+
+🔧 This rule is automatically fixable by the
+[`--fix` CLI option](https://eslint.org/docs/latest/user-guide/command-line-interface#--fix).
+
+<!-- end auto-generated rule header -->
+
+When mocking a function by overwriting a property you have to manually restore
+the original implementation when cleaning up. When using `jest.spyOn()` Jest
+keeps track of changes, and they can be restored with `jest.restoreAllMocks()`,
+`mockFn.mockRestore()` or by setting `restoreMocks` to `true` in the Jest
+config.
+
+Note: The mock created by `jest.spyOn()` still behaves the same as the original
+function. The original function can be overwritten with
+`mockFn.mockImplementation()` or by some of the
+[other mock functions](https://jestjs.io/docs/en/mock-function-api).
+
+```js
+Date.now = jest.fn(); // Original behaviour lost, returns undefined
+
+jest.spyOn(Date, 'now'); // Turned into a mock function but behaviour hasn't changed
+jest.spyOn(Date, 'now').mockImplementation(() => 10); // Will always return 10
+jest.spyOn(Date, 'now').mockReturnValue(10); // Will always return 10
+```
+
+## Rule details
+
+This rule triggers a warning if an object's property is overwritten with a jest
+mock.
+
+The following patterns are considered warnings:
+
+```js
+Date.now = jest.fn();
+Date.now = jest.fn(() => 10);
+```
+
+These patterns would not be considered warnings:
+
+```js
+jest.spyOn(Date, 'now');
+jest.spyOn(Date, 'now').mockImplementation(() => 10);
+```

capabilities/testdrive-jsui/node_modules/eslint-plugin-jest/docs/rules/prefer-strict-equal.md

@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+# Suggest using `toStrictEqual()` (`prefer-strict-equal`)
+
+💡 This rule is manually fixable by
+[editor suggestions](https://eslint.org/docs/developer-guide/working-with-rules#providing-suggestions).
+
+<!-- end auto-generated rule header -->
+
+`toStrictEqual` not only checks that two objects contain the same data but also
+that they have the same structure. It is common to expect objects to not only
+have identical values but also to have identical keys. A stricter equality will
+catch cases where two objects do not have identical keys.
+
+## Rule details
+
+This rule triggers a warning if `toEqual()` is used to assert equality.
+
+The following pattern is considered warning:
+
+```js
+expect({ a: 'a', b: undefined }).toEqual({ a: 'a' }); // true
+```
+
+The following pattern is not warning:
+
+```js
+expect({ a: 'a', b: undefined }).toStrictEqual({ a: 'a' }); // false
+```

capabilities/testdrive-jsui/node_modules/eslint-plugin-jest/docs/rules/prefer-to-be.md

@@ -0,0 +1,61 @@
+# Suggest using `toBe()` for primitive literals (`prefer-to-be`)
+
+💼 This rule is enabled in the 🎨 `style`
+[config](https://github.com/jest-community/eslint-plugin-jest/blob/main/README.md#shareable-configurations).
+
+🔧 This rule is automatically fixable by the
+[`--fix` CLI option](https://eslint.org/docs/latest/user-guide/command-line-interface#--fix).
+
+<!-- end auto-generated rule header -->
+
+When asserting against primitive literals such as numbers and strings, the
+equality matchers all operate the same, but read slightly differently in code.
+
+This rule recommends using the `toBe` matcher in these situations, as it forms
+the most grammatically natural sentence. For `null`, `undefined`, and `NaN` this
+rule recommends using their specific `toBe` matchers, as they give better error
+messages as well.
+
+## Rule details
+
+This rule triggers a warning if `toEqual()` or `toStrictEqual()` are used to
+assert a primitive literal value such as numbers, strings, and booleans.
+
+The following patterns are considered warnings:
+
+```js
+expect(value).not.toEqual(5);
+expect(getMessage()).toStrictEqual('hello world');
+expect(loadMessage()).resolves.toEqual('hello world');
+```
+
+The following pattern is not warning:
+
+```js
+expect(value).not.toBe(5);
+expect(getMessage()).toBe('hello world');
+expect(loadMessage()).resolves.toBe('hello world');
+expect(didError).not.toBe(true);
+
+expect(catchError()).toStrictEqual({ message: 'oh noes!' });
+```
+
+For `null`, `undefined`, and `NaN`, this rule triggers a warning if `toBe` is
+used to assert against those literal values instead of their more specific
+`toBe` counterparts:
+
+```js
+expect(value).not.toBe(undefined);
+expect(getMessage()).toBe(null);
+expect(countMessages()).resolves.not.toBe(NaN);
+```
+
+The following pattern is not warning:
+
+```js
+expect(value).toBeDefined();
+expect(getMessage()).toBeNull();
+expect(countMessages()).resolves.not.toBeNaN();
+
+expect(catchError()).toStrictEqual({ message: undefined });
+```

capabilities/testdrive-jsui/node_modules/eslint-plugin-jest/docs/rules/prefer-to-contain.md

@@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
+# Suggest using `toContain()` (`prefer-to-contain`)
+
+💼 This rule is enabled in the 🎨 `style`
+[config](https://github.com/jest-community/eslint-plugin-jest/blob/main/README.md#shareable-configurations).
+
+🔧 This rule is automatically fixable by the
+[`--fix` CLI option](https://eslint.org/docs/latest/user-guide/command-line-interface#--fix).
+
+<!-- end auto-generated rule header -->
+
+In order to have a better failure message, `toContain()` should be used upon
+asserting expectations on an array containing an object.
+
+## Rule details
+
+This rule triggers a warning if `toBe()`, `toEqual()` or `toStrictEqual()` is
+used to assert object inclusion in an array
+
+```js
+expect(a.includes(b)).toBe(true);
+```
+
+```js
+expect(a.includes(b)).not.toBe(true);
+```
+
+```js
+expect(a.includes(b)).toBe(false);
+```
+
+The following patterns are considered warnings:
+
+```js
+expect(a.includes(b)).toBe(true);
+
+expect(a.includes(b)).not.toBe(true);
+
+expect(a.includes(b)).toBe(false);
+
+expect(a.includes(b)).toEqual(true);
+
+expect(a.includes(b)).toStrictEqual(true);
+```
+
+The following patterns are not considered warnings:
+
+```js
+expect(a).toContain(b);
+
+expect(a).not.toContain(b);
+```

capabilities/testdrive-jsui/node_modules/eslint-plugin-jest/docs/rules/prefer-to-have-length.md

@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+# Suggest using `toHaveLength()` (`prefer-to-have-length`)
+
+💼 This rule is enabled in the 🎨 `style`
+[config](https://github.com/jest-community/eslint-plugin-jest/blob/main/README.md#shareable-configurations).
+
+🔧 This rule is automatically fixable by the
+[`--fix` CLI option](https://eslint.org/docs/latest/user-guide/command-line-interface#--fix).
+
+<!-- end auto-generated rule header -->
+
+In order to have a better failure message, `toHaveLength()` should be used upon
+asserting expectations on objects length property.
+
+## Rule details
+
+This rule triggers a warning if `toBe()`, `toEqual()` or `toStrictEqual()` is
+used to assert objects length property.
+
+```js
+expect(files.length).toBe(1);
+```
+
+This rule is enabled by default.
+
+The following patterns are considered warnings:
+
+```js
+expect(files.length).toBe(1);
+
+expect(files.length).toEqual(1);
+
+expect(files.length).toStrictEqual(1);
+```
+
+The following pattern is not warning:
+
+```js
+expect(files).toHaveLength(1);
+```

capabilities/testdrive-jsui/node_modules/eslint-plugin-jest/docs/rules/prefer-todo.md

@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+# Suggest using `test.todo` (`prefer-todo`)
+
+🔧 This rule is automatically fixable by the
+[`--fix` CLI option](https://eslint.org/docs/latest/user-guide/command-line-interface#--fix).
+
+<!-- end auto-generated rule header -->
+
+When test cases are empty then it is better to mark them as `test.todo` as it
+will be highlighted in the summary output.
+
+## Rule details
+
+This rule triggers a warning if empty test cases are used without 'test.todo'.
+
+```js
+test('i need to write this test');
+```
+
+The following pattern is considered warning:
+
+```js
+test('i need to write this test'); // Unimplemented test case
+test('i need to write this test', () => {}); // Empty test case body
+test.skip('i need to write this test', () => {}); // Empty test case body
+```
+
+The following pattern is not warning:
+
+```js
+test.todo('i need to write this test');
+```

capabilities/testdrive-jsui/node_modules/eslint-plugin-jest/docs/rules/require-hook.md

@@ -0,0 +1,185 @@
+# Require setup and teardown code to be within a hook (`require-hook`)
+
+<!-- end auto-generated rule header -->
+
+It's common when writing tests to need to perform setup work that has to happen
+before tests run, and finishing work after tests run.
+
+Because Jest executes all `describe` handlers in a test file _before_ it
+executes any of the actual tests, it's important to ensure setup and teardown
+work is done inside `before*` and `after*` handlers respectively, rather than
+inside the `describe` blocks.
+
+## Rule details
+
+This rule flags any expression that is either at the toplevel of a test file or
+directly within the body of a `describe`, _except_ for the following:
+
+- `import` statements
+- `const` variables
+- `let` _declarations_, and initializations to `null` or `undefined`
+- Classes
+- Types
+- Calls to the standard Jest globals
+
+This rule flags any function calls within test files that are directly within
+the body of a `describe`, and suggests wrapping them in one of the four
+lifecycle hooks.
+
+Here is a slightly contrived test file showcasing some common cases that would
+be flagged:
+
+```js
+import { database, isCity } from '../database';
+import { Logger } from '../../../src/Logger';
+import { loadCities } from '../api';
+
+jest.mock('../api');
+
+const initializeCityDatabase = () => {
+  database.addCity('Vienna');
+  database.addCity('San Juan');
+  database.addCity('Wellington');
+};
+
+const clearCityDatabase = () => {
+  database.clear();
+};
+
+initializeCityDatabase();
+
+test('that persists cities', () => {
+  expect(database.cities.length).toHaveLength(3);
+});
+
+test('city database has Vienna', () => {
+  expect(isCity('Vienna')).toBeTruthy();
+});
+
+test('city database has San Juan', () => {
+  expect(isCity('San Juan')).toBeTruthy();
+});
+
+describe('when loading cities from the api', () => {
+  let consoleWarnSpy = jest.spyOn(console, 'warn');
+
+  loadCities.mockResolvedValue(['Wellington', 'London']);
+
+  it('does not duplicate cities', async () => {
+    await database.loadCities();
+
+    expect(database.cities).toHaveLength(4);
+  });
+
+  it('logs any duplicates', async () => {
+    await database.loadCities();
+
+    expect(consoleWarnSpy).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
+      'Ignored duplicate cities: Wellington',
+    );
+  });
+});
+
+clearCityDatabase();
+```
+
+Here is the same slightly contrived test file showcasing the same common cases
+but in ways that would be **not** flagged:
+
+```js
+import { database, isCity } from '../database';
+import { Logger } from '../../../src/Logger';
+import { loadCities } from '../api';
+
+jest.mock('../api');
+
+const initializeCityDatabase = () => {
+  database.addCity('Vienna');
+  database.addCity('San Juan');
+  database.addCity('Wellington');
+};
+
+const clearCityDatabase = () => {
+  database.clear();
+};
+
+beforeEach(() => {
+  initializeCityDatabase();
+});
+
+test('that persists cities', () => {
+  expect(database.cities.length).toHaveLength(3);
+});
+
+test('city database has Vienna', () => {
+  expect(isCity('Vienna')).toBeTruthy();
+});
+
+test('city database has San Juan', () => {
+  expect(isCity('San Juan')).toBeTruthy();
+});
+
+describe('when loading cities from the api', () => {
+  let consoleWarnSpy;
+
+  beforeEach(() => {
+    consoleWarnSpy = jest.spyOn(console, 'warn');
+    loadCities.mockResolvedValue(['Wellington', 'London']);
+  });
+
+  it('does not duplicate cities', async () => {
+    await database.loadCities();
+
+    expect(database.cities).toHaveLength(4);
+  });
+
+  it('logs any duplicates', async () => {
+    await database.loadCities();
+
+    expect(consoleWarnSpy).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
+      'Ignored duplicate cities: Wellington',
+    );
+  });
+});
+
+afterEach(() => {
+  clearCityDatabase();
+});
+```
+
+## Options
+
+If there are methods that you want to call outside of hooks and tests, you can
+mark them as allowed using the `allowedFunctionCalls` option.
+
+```json
+{
+  "jest/require-hook": [
+    "error",
+    {
+      "allowedFunctionCalls": ["enableAutoDestroy"]
+    }
+  ]
+}
+```
+
+Examples of **correct** code when using
+`{ "allowedFunctionCalls": ["enableAutoDestroy"] }` option:
+
+```js
+/* eslint jest/require-hook: ["error", { "allowedFunctionCalls": ["enableAutoDestroy"] }] */
+
+import { enableAutoDestroy, mount } from '@vue/test-utils';
+import { initDatabase, tearDownDatabase } from './databaseUtils';
+
+enableAutoDestroy(afterEach);
+
+beforeEach(initDatabase);
+afterEach(tearDownDatabase);
+
+describe('Foo', () => {
+  test('always returns 42', () => {
+    expect(global.getAnswer()).toBe(42);
+  });
+});
+```

capabilities/testdrive-jsui/node_modules/eslint-plugin-jest/docs/rules/require-to-throw-message.md

@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
+# Require a message for `toThrow()` (`require-to-throw-message`)
+
+<!-- end auto-generated rule header -->
+
+`toThrow()` (and its alias `toThrowError()`) is used to check if an error is
+thrown by a function call, such as in `expect(() => a()).toThrow()`. However, if
+no message is defined, then the test will pass for any thrown error. Requiring a
+message ensures that the intended error is thrown.
+
+## Rule details
+
+This rule triggers a warning if `toThrow()` or `toThrowError()` is used without
+an error message.
+
+The following patterns are considered warnings:
+
+```js
+test('all the things', async () => {
+  expect(() => a()).toThrow();
+
+  expect(() => a()).toThrowError();
+
+  await expect(a()).rejects.toThrow();
+
+  await expect(a()).rejects.toThrowError();
+});
+```
+
+The following patterns are not considered warnings:
+
+```js
+test('all the things', async () => {
+  expect(() => a()).toThrow('a');
+
+  expect(() => a()).toThrowError('a');
+
+  await expect(a()).rejects.toThrow('a');
+
+  await expect(a()).rejects.toThrowError('a');
+});
+```

capabilities/testdrive-jsui/node_modules/eslint-plugin-jest/docs/rules/require-top-level-describe.md

@@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
+# Require test cases and hooks to be inside a `describe` block (`require-top-level-describe`)
+
+<!-- end auto-generated rule header -->
+
+Jest allows you to organise your test files the way you want it. However, the
+more your codebase grows, the more it becomes hard to navigate in your test
+files. This rule makes sure you provide at least a top-level `describe` block in
+your test file.
+
+## Rule details
+
+This rule triggers a warning if a test case (`test` and `it`) or a hook
+(`beforeAll`, `beforeEach`, `afterEach`, `afterAll`) is not located in a
+top-level `describe` block.
+
+The following patterns are considered warnings:
+
+```js
+// Above a describe block
+test('my test', () => {});
+describe('test suite', () => {
+  it('test', () => {});
+});
+
+// Below a describe block
+describe('test suite', () => {});
+test('my test', () => {});
+
+// Same for hooks
+beforeAll('my beforeAll', () => {});
+describe('test suite', () => {});
+afterEach('my afterEach', () => {});
+```
+
+The following patterns are **not** considered warnings:
+
+```js
+// In a describe block
+describe('test suite', () => {
+  test('my test', () => {});
+});
+
+// In a nested describe block
+describe('test suite', () => {
+  test('my test', () => {});
+  describe('another test suite', () => {
+    test('my other test', () => {});
+  });
+});
+```
+
+## Options
+
+You can also enforce a limit on the number of describes allowed at the top-level
+using the `maxNumberOfTopLevelDescribes` option:
+
+```json
+{
+  "jest/require-top-level-describe": [
+    "error",
+    {
+      "maxNumberOfTopLevelDescribes": 2
+    }
+  ]
+}
+```
+
+Examples of **incorrect** code with the above config:
+
+```js
+describe('test suite', () => {
+  it('test', () => {});
+});
+
+describe('test suite', () => {});
+
+describe('test suite', () => {});
+```
+
+This option defaults to `Infinity`, allowing any number of top-level describes.
+
+## When Not To Use It
+
+Don't use this rule on non-jest test files.

capabilities/testdrive-jsui/node_modules/eslint-plugin-jest/docs/rules/unbound-method.md

@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
+# Enforce unbound methods are called with their expected scope (`unbound-method`)
+
+💭 This rule requires type information.
+
+<!-- end auto-generated rule header -->
+
+## Rule details
+
+This rule extends the base [`@typescript-eslint/unbound-method`][original-rule]
+rule, meaning you must depend on `@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin` for it to
+work. It adds support for understanding when it's ok to pass an unbound method
+to `expect` calls.
+
+See the [`@typescript-eslint` documentation][original-rule] for more details on
+the `unbound-method` rule.
+
+Note that while this rule requires type information to work, it will fail
+silently when not available allowing you to safely enable it on projects that
+are not using TypeScript.
+
+## How to use
+
+```json5
+{
+  parser: '@typescript-eslint/parser',
+  parserOptions: {
+    project: 'tsconfig.json',
+    ecmaVersion: 2020,
+    sourceType: 'module',
+  },
+  overrides: [
+    {
+      files: ['test/**'],
+      plugins: ['jest'],
+      rules: {
+        // you should turn the original rule off *only* for test files
+        '@typescript-eslint/unbound-method': 'off',
+        'jest/unbound-method': 'error',
+      },
+    },
+  ],
+  rules: {
+    '@typescript-eslint/unbound-method': 'error',
+  },
+}
+```
+
+This rule should be applied to your test files in place of the original rule,
+which should be applied to the rest of your codebase.
+
+## Options
+
+See [`@typescript-eslint/unbound-method`][original-rule] options (e.g.
+`ignoreStatic`).
+
+<sup>Taken with ❤️ [from `@typescript-eslint` core][original-rule]</sup>
+
+[original-rule]:
+  https://github.com/typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint/blob/master/packages/eslint-plugin/docs/rules/unbound-method.md

capabilities/testdrive-jsui/node_modules/eslint-plugin-jest/docs/rules/valid-describe-callback.md

@@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
+# Enforce valid `describe()` callback (`valid-describe-callback`)
+
+💼 This rule is enabled in the ✅ `recommended`
+[config](https://github.com/jest-community/eslint-plugin-jest/blob/main/README.md#shareable-configurations).
+
+<!-- end auto-generated rule header -->
+
+Using an improper `describe()` callback function can lead to unexpected test
+errors.
+
+## Rule details
+
+This rule validates that the second parameter of a `describe()` function is a
+callback function. This callback function:
+
+- should not be
+  [async](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Statements/async_function)
+- should not contain any parameters
+- should not contain any `return` statements
+
+The following `describe` function aliases are also validated:
+
+- `describe`
+- `describe.only`
+- `describe.skip`
+- `fdescribe`
+- `xdescribe`
+
+The following patterns are considered warnings:
+
+```js
+// Async callback functions are not allowed
+describe('myFunction()', async () => {
+  // ...
+});
+
+// Callback function parameters are not allowed
+describe('myFunction()', done => {
+  // ...
+});
+
+//
+describe('myFunction', () => {
+  // No return statements are allowed in block of a callback function
+  return Promise.resolve().then(() => {
+    it('breaks', () => {
+      throw new Error('Fail');
+    });
+  });
+});
+
+// Returning a value from a describe block is not allowed
+describe('myFunction', () =>
+  it('returns a truthy value', () => {
+    expect(myFunction()).toBeTruthy();
+  }));
+```
+
+The following patterns are not considered warnings:
+
+```js
+describe('myFunction()', () => {
+  it('returns a truthy value', () => {
+    expect(myFunction()).toBeTruthy();
+  });
+});
+```

capabilities/testdrive-jsui/node_modules/eslint-plugin-jest/docs/rules/valid-expect-in-promise.md

@@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
+# Require promises that have expectations in their chain to be valid (`valid-expect-in-promise`)
+
+💼 This rule is enabled in the ✅ `recommended`
+[config](https://github.com/jest-community/eslint-plugin-jest/blob/main/README.md#shareable-configurations).
+
+<!-- end auto-generated rule header -->
+
+Ensure promises that include expectations are returned or awaited.
+
+## Rule details
+
+This rule flags any promises within the body of a test that include expectations
+that have either not been returned or awaited.
+
+The following patterns is considered warning:
+
+```js
+it('promises a person', () => {
+  api.getPersonByName('bob').then(person => {
+    expect(person).toHaveProperty('name', 'Bob');
+  });
+});
+
+it('promises a counted person', () => {
+  const promise = api.getPersonByName('bob').then(person => {
+    expect(person).toHaveProperty('name', 'Bob');
+  });
+
+  promise.then(() => {
+    expect(analytics.gottenPeopleCount).toBe(1);
+  });
+});
+
+it('promises multiple people', () => {
+  const firstPromise = api.getPersonByName('bob').then(person => {
+    expect(person).toHaveProperty('name', 'Bob');
+  });
+  const secondPromise = api.getPersonByName('alice').then(person => {
+    expect(person).toHaveProperty('name', 'Alice');
+  });
+
+  return Promise.any([firstPromise, secondPromise]);
+});
+```
+
+The following pattern is not warning:
+
+```js
+it('promises a person', async () => {
+  await api.getPersonByName('bob').then(person => {
+    expect(person).toHaveProperty('name', 'Bob');
+  });
+});
+
+it('promises a counted person', () => {
+  let promise = api.getPersonByName('bob').then(person => {
+    expect(person).toHaveProperty('name', 'Bob');
+  });
+
+  promise = promise.then(() => {
+    expect(analytics.gottenPeopleCount).toBe(1);
+  });
+
+  return promise;
+});
+
+it('promises multiple people', () => {
+  const firstPromise = api.getPersonByName('bob').then(person => {
+    expect(person).toHaveProperty('name', 'Bob');
+  });
+  const secondPromise = api.getPersonByName('alice').then(person => {
+    expect(person).toHaveProperty('name', 'Alice');
+  });
+
+  return Promise.allSettled([firstPromise, secondPromise]);
+});
+```

capabilities/testdrive-jsui/node_modules/eslint-plugin-jest/docs/rules/valid-expect.md

@@ -0,0 +1,147 @@
+# Enforce valid `expect()` usage (`valid-expect`)
+
+💼 This rule is enabled in the ✅ `recommended`
+[config](https://github.com/jest-community/eslint-plugin-jest/blob/main/README.md#shareable-configurations).
+
+<!-- end auto-generated rule header -->
+
+Ensure `expect()` is called with a single argument and there is an actual
+expectation made.
+
+## Rule details
+
+This rule triggers a warning if `expect()` is called with more than one argument
+or without arguments. It would also issue a warning if there is nothing called
+on `expect()`, e.g.:
+
+```js
+expect();
+expect('something');
+```
+
+or when a matcher function was not called, e.g.:
+
+```js
+expect(true).toBeDefined;
+```
+
+or when an async assertion was not `await`ed or returned, e.g.:
+
+```js
+expect(Promise.resolve('Hi!')).resolves.toBe('Hi!');
+```
+
+This rule is enabled by default.
+
+## Options
+
+```json5
+{
+  type: 'object',
+  properties: {
+    alwaysAwait: {
+      type: 'boolean',
+      default: false,
+    },
+    asyncMatchers: {
+      type: 'array',
+      items: { type: 'string' },
+      default: ['toResolve', 'toReject'],
+    },
+    minArgs: {
+      type: 'number',
+      minimum: 1,
+    },
+    maxArgs: {
+      type: 'number',
+      minimum: 1,
+    },
+  },
+  additionalProperties: false,
+}
+```
+
+### `alwaysAwait`
+
+Enforces to use `await` inside block statements. Using `return` will trigger a
+warning. Returning one line statements with arrow functions is _always allowed_.
+
+Examples of **incorrect** code for the `{ "alwaysAwait": true }` option:
+
+```js
+// alwaysAwait: true
+test('test1', async () => {
+  await expect(Promise.resolve(2)).resolves.toBeDefined();
+  return expect(Promise.resolve(1)).resolves.toBe(1); // `return` statement will trigger a warning
+});
+```
+
+Examples of **correct** code for the `{ "alwaysAwait": true }` option:
+
+```js
+// alwaysAwait: true
+test('test1', async () => {
+  await expect(Promise.resolve(2)).resolves.toBeDefined();
+  await expect(Promise.resolve(1)).resolves.toBe(1);
+});
+
+test('test2', () => expect(Promise.resolve(2)).resolves.toBe(2));
+```
+
+### `asyncMatchers`
+
+Allows specifying which matchers return promises, and so should be considered
+async when checking if an `expect` should be returned or awaited.
+
+By default, this has a list of all the async matchers provided by
+`jest-extended` (namely, `toResolve` and `toReject`).
+
+### `minArgs` & `maxArgs`
+
+Enforces the minimum and maximum number of arguments that `expect` can take, and
+is required to take.
+
+Both of these properties have a default value of `1`, which is the number of
+arguments supported by vanilla `expect`.
+
+This is useful when you're using libraries that increase the number of arguments
+supported by `expect`, such as
+[`jest-expect-message`](https://www.npmjs.com/package/jest-expect-message).
+
+The following patterns are considered warnings:
+
+```js
+test('all the things', async () => {
+  expect();
+  expect().toEqual('something');
+  expect('something', 'else');
+  expect('something');
+  await expect('something');
+  expect(true).toBeDefined;
+  expect(Promise.resolve('hello')).resolves;
+  expect(Promise.resolve('hello')).resolves.toEqual('hello');
+  Promise.resolve(expect(Promise.resolve('hello')).resolves.toEqual('hello'));
+  Promise.all([
+    expect(Promise.resolve('hello')).resolves.toEqual('hello'),
+    expect(Promise.resolve('hi')).resolves.toEqual('hi'),
+  ]);
+});
+```
+
+The following patterns are not warnings:
+
+```js
+test('all the things', async () => {
+  expect('something').toEqual('something');
+  expect([1, 2, 3]).toEqual([1, 2, 3]);
+  expect(true).toBeDefined();
+  await expect(Promise.resolve('hello')).resolves.toEqual('hello');
+  await Promise.resolve(
+    expect(Promise.resolve('hello')).resolves.toEqual('hello'),
+  );
+  await Promise.all([
+    expect(Promise.resolve('hello')).resolves.toEqual('hello'),
+    expect(Promise.resolve('hi')).resolves.toEqual('hi'),
+  ]);
+});
+```

capabilities/testdrive-jsui/node_modules/eslint-plugin-jest/docs/rules/valid-title.md

@@ -0,0 +1,283 @@
+# Enforce valid titles (`valid-title`)
+
+💼 This rule is enabled in the ✅ `recommended`
+[config](https://github.com/jest-community/eslint-plugin-jest/blob/main/README.md#shareable-configurations).
+
+🔧 This rule is automatically fixable by the
+[`--fix` CLI option](https://eslint.org/docs/latest/user-guide/command-line-interface#--fix).
+
+<!-- end auto-generated rule header -->
+
+Checks that the title of Jest blocks are valid by ensuring that titles are:
+
+- not empty,
+- is a string,
+- not prefixed with their block name,
+- have no leading or trailing spaces
+
+## Rule details
+
+**emptyTitle**
+
+An empty title is not informative, and serves little purpose.
+
+Examples of **incorrect** code for this rule:
+
+```js
+describe('', () => {});
+describe('foo', () => {
+  it('', () => {});
+});
+it('', () => {});
+test('', () => {});
+xdescribe('', () => {});
+xit('', () => {});
+xtest('', () => {});
+```
+
+Examples of **correct** code for this rule:
+
+```js
+describe('foo', () => {});
+describe('foo', () => {
+  it('bar', () => {});
+});
+test('foo', () => {});
+it('foo', () => {});
+xdescribe('foo', () => {});
+xit('foo', () => {});
+xtest('foo', () => {});
+```
+
+**titleMustBeString**
+
+Titles for `describe`, `test`, and `it` blocks should always be a string; you
+can disable this with the `ignoreTypeOfDescribeName` and `ignoreTypeOfTestName`
+options.
+
+Examples of **incorrect** code for this rule:
+
+```js
+it(123, () => {});
+describe(String(/.+/), () => {});
+describe(myFunction, () => {});
+xdescribe(myFunction, () => {});
+describe(6, function () {});
+```
+
+Examples of **correct** code for this rule:
+
+```js
+it('is a string', () => {});
+test('is a string', () => {});
+xtest('is a string', () => {});
+describe('is a string', () => {});
+describe.skip('is a string', () => {});
+fdescribe('is a string', () => {});
+```
+
+Examples of **correct** code when `ignoreTypeOfDescribeName` is `true`:
+
+```js
+it('is a string', () => {});
+test('is a string', () => {});
+xtest('is a string', () => {});
+describe('is a string', () => {});
+describe.skip('is a string', () => {});
+fdescribe('is a string', () => {});
+
+describe(String(/.+/), () => {});
+describe(myFunction, () => {});
+xdescribe(myFunction, () => {});
+describe(6, function () {});
+```
+
+Examples of **correct** code when `ignoreTypeOfTestName` is `true`:
+
+```js
+const myTestName = 'is a string';
+
+it(String(/.+/), () => {});
+it(myFunction, () => {});
+it(myTestName, () => {});
+xit(myFunction, () => {});
+it(6, function () {});
+```
+
+**duplicatePrefix**
+
+A `describe` / `test` block should not start with `duplicatePrefix`
+
+Examples of **incorrect** code for this rule
+
+```js
+test('test foo', () => {});
+it('it foo', () => {});
+
+describe('foo', () => {
+  test('test bar', () => {});
+});
+
+describe('describe foo', () => {
+  test('bar', () => {});
+});
+```
+
+Examples of **correct** code for this rule
+
+```js
+test('foo', () => {});
+it('foo', () => {});
+
+describe('foo', () => {
+  test('bar', () => {});
+});
+```
+
+**accidentalSpace**
+
+A `describe` / `test` block should not contain accidentalSpace, but can be
+turned off via the `ignoreSpaces` option:
+
+Examples of **incorrect** code for this rule
+
+```js
+test(' foo', () => {});
+it(' foo', () => {});
+
+describe('foo', () => {
+  test(' bar', () => {});
+});
+
+describe(' foo', () => {
+  test('bar', () => {});
+});
+
+describe('foo  ', () => {
+  test('bar', () => {});
+});
+```
+
+Examples of **correct** code for this rule
+
+```js
+test('foo', () => {});
+it('foo', () => {});
+
+describe('foo', () => {
+  test('bar', () => {});
+});
+```
+
+## Options
+
+```ts
+interface Options {
+  ignoreSpaces?: boolean;
+  ignoreTypeOfDescribeName?: boolean;
+  disallowedWords?: string[];
+  mustNotMatch?: Partial<Record<'describe' | 'test' | 'it', string>> | string;
+  mustMatch?: Partial<Record<'describe' | 'test' | 'it', string>> | string;
+}
+```
+
+#### `ignoreSpaces`
+
+Default: `false`
+
+When enabled, the leading and trailing spaces won't be checked.
+
+#### `ignoreTypeOfDescribeName`
+
+Default: `false`
+
+When enabled, the type of the first argument to `describe` blocks won't be
+checked.
+
+#### `disallowedWords`
+
+Default: `[]`
+
+A string array of words that are not allowed to be used in test titles. Matching
+is not case-sensitive, and looks for complete words:
+
+Examples of **incorrect** code when using `disallowedWords`:
+
+```js
+// with disallowedWords: ['correct', 'all', 'every', 'properly']
+describe('the correct way to do things', () => {});
+it('has ALL the things', () => {});
+xdescribe('every single one of them', () => {});
+test(`that the value is set properly`, () => {});
+```
+
+Examples of **correct** code when using `disallowedWords`:
+
+```js
+// with disallowedWords: ['correct', 'all', 'every', 'properly']
+it('correctly sets the value', () => {});
+test('that everything is as it should be', () => {});
+describe('the proper way to handle things', () => {});
+```
+
+#### `mustMatch` & `mustNotMatch`
+
+Defaults: `{}`
+
+Allows enforcing that titles must match or must not match a given Regular
+Expression, with an optional message. An object can be provided to apply
+different Regular Expressions (with optional messages) to specific Jest test
+function groups (`describe`, `test`, and `it`).
+
+Examples of **incorrect** code when using `mustMatch`:
+
+```js
+// with mustMatch: '^that'
+describe('the correct way to do things', () => {});
+fit('this there!', () => {});
+
+// with mustMatch: { test: '^that' }
+describe('the tests that will be run', () => {});
+test('the stuff works', () => {});
+xtest('errors that are thrown have messages', () => {});
+```
+
+Examples of **correct** code when using `mustMatch`:
+
+```js
+// with mustMatch: '^that'
+describe('that thing that needs to be done', () => {});
+fit('that this there!', () => {});
+
+// with mustMatch: { test: '^that' }
+describe('the tests that will be run', () => {});
+test('that the stuff works', () => {});
+xtest('that errors that thrown have messages', () => {});
+```
+
+Optionally you can provide a custom message to show for a particular matcher by
+using a tuple at any level where you can provide a matcher:
+
+```js
+const prefixes = ['when', 'with', 'without', 'if', 'unless', 'for'];
+const prefixesList = prefixes.join('  - \n');
+
+module.exports = {
+  rules: {
+    'jest/valid-title': [
+      'error',
+      {
+        mustNotMatch: ['\\.$', 'Titles should not end with a full-stop'],
+        mustMatch: {
+          describe: [
+            new RegExp(`^(?:[A-Z]|\\b(${prefixes.join('|')})\\b`, 'u').source,
+            `Describe titles should either start with a capital letter or one of the following prefixes: ${prefixesList}`,
+          ],
+          test: [/[^A-Z]/u.source],
+          it: /[^A-Z]/u.source,
+        },
+      },
+    ],
+  },
+};
+```