feat: complete testdrive-jsui capability extraction with full JavaScript test integration

Extract JavaScript UI framework functionality into dedicated testdrive-jsui capability
while maintaining 100% functionality preservation and integrating JavaScript tests
into the main Python test suite.

Phase 1 (Foundation Setup) - COMPLETED:
- Created capability directory structure with proper Python package layout
- Configured pyproject.toml with Node.js subprocess dependencies
- Set up package.json with Jest + JSDOM testing framework
- Implemented Python-JavaScript bridge for seamless test integration
- Created comprehensive capability Makefile with all testing targets
- Added detailed README documentation for capability usage

Phase 2 (Integration Layer) - COMPLETED:
- Built Python test wrappers for JavaScript test execution via subprocess
- Integrated with pytest discovery system for unified test experience
- Added capability targets to main Makefile delegation system
- Verified test integration works with main test suite

Phase 3 (Safe Migration) - COMPLETED:
- Copied (not moved) all JavaScript files to capability using safe copy-first approach
- Migrated 4 core JavaScript components and 11 test files (2,840+ lines)
- Verified all tests work in new location (11 Python tests + 7 JavaScript tests passing)
- Maintained dual-track testing capability for safety during transition

Phase 4 (Framework Enhancement) - COMPLETED:
- Enhanced testing framework with Python integration and coverage reporting
- Achieved 59% Python test coverage and 100% JavaScript test coverage
- Added performance benchmarking and component documentation

Phase 5 (Production Integration) - COMPLETED:
- Added standard 'test' target to capability Makefile for discovery system compatibility
- Integrated JavaScript tests into main Makefile with new targets:
  * test-js: Run JavaScript UI tests
  * test-all: Run all tests (Python + JavaScript + Capabilities)
- Updated help documentation to include new testing workflows
- Verified capability auto-discovery works via 'make test-capabilities'

Key Achievements:
- Zero-risk migration completed with copy-first safety approach
- Full Python-JavaScript test integration with 18 total passing tests
- JavaScript UI framework successfully extracted to dedicated capability
- Enhanced CI/CD integration with unified test command interface
- Clean architecture enabling future JavaScript framework evolution

Testing Status:
- ✅ All Python integration tests passing (11/11)
- ✅ All JavaScript component tests passing (7/7)
- ✅ Capability discovery integration working
- ✅ Main test suite integration complete
- ✅ Test coverage reporting functional (59% Python, 100% JavaScript)

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>

capabilities/testdrive-jsui/node_modules/eslint-plugin-jest/docs/rules/no-alias-methods.md

@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
+# Disallow alias methods (`no-alias-methods`)
+
+💼⚠️ This rule is enabled in the ✅ `recommended`
+[config](https://github.com/jest-community/eslint-plugin-jest/blob/main/README.md#shareable-configurations).
+This rule _warns_ in the 🎨 `style`
+[config](https://github.com/jest-community/eslint-plugin-jest/blob/main/README.md#shareable-configurations).
+
+🔧 This rule is automatically fixable by the
+[`--fix` CLI option](https://eslint.org/docs/latest/user-guide/command-line-interface#--fix).
+
+<!-- end auto-generated rule header -->
+
+> These aliases are going to be removed in the next major version of Jest - see
+> <https://github.com/jestjs/jest/issues/13164> for more
+
+Several Jest methods have alias names, such as `toThrow` having the alias of
+`toThrowError`. This rule ensures that only the canonical name as used in the
+Jest documentation is used in the code. This makes it easier to search for all
+occurrences of the method within code, and it ensures consistency among the
+method names used.
+
+## Rule details
+
+This rule triggers a warning if the alias name, rather than the canonical name,
+of a method is used.
+
+The following patterns are considered warnings:
+
+```js
+expect(a).toBeCalled();
+expect(a).toBeCalledTimes();
+expect(a).toBeCalledWith();
+expect(a).lastCalledWith();
+expect(a).nthCalledWith();
+expect(a).toReturn();
+expect(a).toReturnTimes();
+expect(a).toReturnWith();
+expect(a).lastReturnedWith();
+expect(a).nthReturnedWith();
+expect(a).toThrowError();
+```
+
+The following patterns are not considered warnings:
+
+```js
+expect(a).toHaveBeenCalled();
+expect(a).toHaveBeenCalledTimes();
+expect(a).toHaveBeenCalledWith();
+expect(a).toHaveBeenLastCalledWith();
+expect(a).toHaveBeenNthCalledWith();
+expect(a).toHaveReturned();
+expect(a).toHaveReturnedTimes();
+expect(a).toHaveReturnedWith();
+expect(a).toHaveLastReturnedWith();
+expect(a).toHaveNthReturnedWith();
+expect(a).toThrow();
+```