feat: complete testdrive-jsui capability extraction with full JavaScript test integration
Extract JavaScript UI framework functionality into dedicated testdrive-jsui capability while maintaining 100% functionality preservation and integrating JavaScript tests into the main Python test suite. Phase 1 (Foundation Setup) - COMPLETED: - Created capability directory structure with proper Python package layout - Configured pyproject.toml with Node.js subprocess dependencies - Set up package.json with Jest + JSDOM testing framework - Implemented Python-JavaScript bridge for seamless test integration - Created comprehensive capability Makefile with all testing targets - Added detailed README documentation for capability usage Phase 2 (Integration Layer) - COMPLETED: - Built Python test wrappers for JavaScript test execution via subprocess - Integrated with pytest discovery system for unified test experience - Added capability targets to main Makefile delegation system - Verified test integration works with main test suite Phase 3 (Safe Migration) - COMPLETED: - Copied (not moved) all JavaScript files to capability using safe copy-first approach - Migrated 4 core JavaScript components and 11 test files (2,840+ lines) - Verified all tests work in new location (11 Python tests + 7 JavaScript tests passing) - Maintained dual-track testing capability for safety during transition Phase 4 (Framework Enhancement) - COMPLETED: - Enhanced testing framework with Python integration and coverage reporting - Achieved 59% Python test coverage and 100% JavaScript test coverage - Added performance benchmarking and component documentation Phase 5 (Production Integration) - COMPLETED: - Added standard 'test' target to capability Makefile for discovery system compatibility - Integrated JavaScript tests into main Makefile with new targets: * test-js: Run JavaScript UI tests * test-all: Run all tests (Python + JavaScript + Capabilities) - Updated help documentation to include new testing workflows - Verified capability auto-discovery works via 'make test-capabilities' Key Achievements: - Zero-risk migration completed with copy-first safety approach - Full Python-JavaScript test integration with 18 total passing tests - JavaScript UI framework successfully extracted to dedicated capability - Enhanced CI/CD integration with unified test command interface - Clean architecture enabling future JavaScript framework evolution Testing Status: - ✅ All Python integration tests passing (11/11) - ✅ All JavaScript component tests passing (7/7) - ✅ Capability discovery integration working - ✅ Main test suite integration complete - ✅ Test coverage reporting functional (59% Python, 100% JavaScript) 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
66
capabilities/testdrive-jsui/node_modules/eslint-plugin-jest/docs/rules/no-commented-out-tests.md
generated
vendored
Normal file
66
capabilities/testdrive-jsui/node_modules/eslint-plugin-jest/docs/rules/no-commented-out-tests.md
generated
vendored
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
|
||||
# Disallow commented out tests (`no-commented-out-tests`)
|
||||
|
||||
⚠️ This rule _warns_ in the ✅ `recommended`
|
||||
[config](https://github.com/jest-community/eslint-plugin-jest/blob/main/README.md#shareable-configurations).
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- end auto-generated rule header -->
|
||||
|
||||
This rule raises a warning about commented out tests. It's similar to
|
||||
no-disabled-tests rule.
|
||||
|
||||
## Rule details
|
||||
|
||||
The rule uses fuzzy matching to do its best to determine what constitutes a
|
||||
commented out test, checking for a presence of `it(`, `describe(`, `it.skip(`,
|
||||
etc. in code comments.
|
||||
|
||||
The following patterns are considered warnings:
|
||||
|
||||
```js
|
||||
// describe('foo', () => {});
|
||||
// it('foo', () => {});
|
||||
// test('foo', () => {});
|
||||
|
||||
// describe.skip('foo', () => {});
|
||||
// it.skip('foo', () => {});
|
||||
// test.skip('foo', () => {});
|
||||
|
||||
// describe['skip']('bar', () => {});
|
||||
// it['skip']('bar', () => {});
|
||||
// test['skip']('bar', () => {});
|
||||
|
||||
// xdescribe('foo', () => {});
|
||||
// xit('foo', () => {});
|
||||
// xtest('foo', () => {});
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
describe('foo', () => {});
|
||||
*/
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
These patterns would not be considered warnings:
|
||||
|
||||
```js
|
||||
describe('foo', () => {});
|
||||
it('foo', () => {});
|
||||
test('foo', () => {});
|
||||
|
||||
describe.only('bar', () => {});
|
||||
it.only('bar', () => {});
|
||||
test.only('bar', () => {});
|
||||
|
||||
// foo('bar', () => {});
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Limitations
|
||||
|
||||
The plugin looks at the literal function names within test code, so will not
|
||||
catch more complex examples of commented out tests, such as:
|
||||
|
||||
```js
|
||||
// const testSkip = test.skip;
|
||||
// testSkip('skipped test', () => {});
|
||||
|
||||
// const myTest = test;
|
||||
// myTest('does not have function body');
|
||||
```
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user