feat(infospace): flat canonical entity set with cross-chapter deduplication
Restructure entity storage from per-chapter subdirectories to a flat
canonical set in output/entities/. Each entity exists as a single file;
duplicates across chapters are detected by slug collision and skipped
(first occurrence wins). Chapter views use {{ include }} transclusion
to reference shared entity files.
Add @{existing_entities} macro to extract-entities template so the LLM
knows which entities already exist and focuses on genuinely new ones.
Refactor _call_llm() from _execute_llm() for callers that handle their
own file I/O. 41 unique entities from 4 chapters (2 duplicates removed).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
|
||||
# Universal Opulence
|
||||
|
||||
## Definition
|
||||
|
||||
The general material well-being that extends across all ranks of society,
|
||||
including the lowest, as a consequence of the division of labour and the
|
||||
resulting multiplication of production. Smith argues that through exchange,
|
||||
every workman can supply others abundantly with their specialised product
|
||||
and receive in return the products of others' specialisation, creating a
|
||||
"general plenty" that benefits even the poorest members of a civilised society.
|
||||
|
||||
## Source Chapter
|
||||
|
||||
Book I, Chapter 1: "Of the Division of Labour"
|
||||
|
||||
## Context
|
||||
|
||||
The concluding argument of the chapter. Smith illustrates universal opulence
|
||||
by examining the "accommodation of the most common artificer or daylabourer,"
|
||||
showing that even a coarse woollen coat requires the cooperation of shepherds,
|
||||
wool-combers, dyers, weavers, merchants, sailors, and many others — a vast
|
||||
chain of interdependent labour that would be impossible without specialisation
|
||||
and exchange.
|
||||
|
||||
## Economic Domain
|
||||
|
||||
Distribution
|
||||
|
||||
## Smith's Original Wording
|
||||
|
||||
"It is the great multiplication of the productions of all the different arts,
|
||||
in consequence of the division of labour, which occasions, in a well-governed
|
||||
society, that universal opulence which extends itself to the lowest ranks of
|
||||
the people."
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user