feat(example): add supply-chain-vsm composition demo (S3.5)
Demonstrates infospace composition: the Wealth of Nations infospace is used as a discipline, applying Smith's economic framework as a lens to analyse modern supply chain management concepts. New example: examples/supply-chain-vsm/ - infospace.yaml binding WoN as discipline (../infospace-with-history) - 3 source documents: coordination mechanisms, capital & inventory, market structure (~400 words each, original content) - supply-chain-entity-schema-v1.0.md with WoN Concept required section - won-mapping-schema-v1.0.md with Conceptual Continuity rating - artifacts/won-reference/core-entities.md — 12 curated WoN entities for injection as discipline context - 8 hand-crafted entity files demonstrating LLM output format - 3 mapping files with full rationale and VSM inheritance chains - Viable: YES (5/5 thresholds) Key mappings demonstrated: Demand Signal → Effectual Demand (Strong, S2) Vendor-Managed Inventory → Division of Labour (Strong, S1/S2) Just-in-Time Inventory → Circulating Capital (Strong, S1/S3) Bullwhip Effect → Natural Price (Moderate, S2) Platform Intermediary → Merchant Capital (Strong, S2/S4) Monopsony Power → Combination of Masters (Strong, S3*) Platform fix: entity_parser.py now recognises ## Supply Chain Domain as a domain alias for ## Economic Domain, enabling composed infospaces to use their own domain section name. Tutorial §13 rewritten with real commands, real output, and the full mapping table from the demo. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
|
||||
# Coordination Mechanisms in Modern Supply Chains
|
||||
|
||||
## Demand Signals and Information Flow
|
||||
|
||||
Supply chains coordinate through the propagation of demand signals upstream
|
||||
from end consumers through retailers, distributors, and manufacturers to raw
|
||||
material suppliers. The quality and latency of these signals determine how
|
||||
well production is synchronised with actual consumption.
|
||||
|
||||
In a well-functioning supply chain, a retailer's point-of-sale data becomes
|
||||
the input signal for a distributor's replenishment order, which in turn
|
||||
signals the manufacturer to schedule production runs. When this chain
|
||||
operates with full transparency and zero delay, production closely tracks
|
||||
consumption. When it operates with delays, batching, or information
|
||||
filtering, coordination failures emerge.
|
||||
|
||||
## The Bullwhip Effect
|
||||
|
||||
The bullwhip effect describes the amplification of demand variability as
|
||||
signals travel upstream in a supply chain. A 5% fluctuation in retail
|
||||
demand may translate into a 20% fluctuation in distributor orders and a
|
||||
40% swing in manufacturer production schedules. This amplification occurs
|
||||
because each node in the chain adds a safety buffer to its orders, reacts
|
||||
to the previous period's signal rather than real-time data, and places
|
||||
orders in discrete batches rather than continuously.
|
||||
|
||||
The result is a supply chain that oscillates — periods of excess inventory
|
||||
alternating with periods of shortage — even when underlying consumer demand
|
||||
is relatively stable. The bullwhip effect is not a market equilibrium; it
|
||||
is a coordination failure in which the absence of shared real-time
|
||||
information causes each rational local decision to produce irrational
|
||||
aggregate outcomes.
|
||||
|
||||
## Vendor-Managed Inventory
|
||||
|
||||
Vendor-managed inventory (VMI) is a coordination arrangement in which the
|
||||
supplier, rather than the buyer, is responsible for maintaining stock levels
|
||||
at the buyer's location. The supplier has read access to the buyer's
|
||||
inventory data and automatically replenishes when stock falls below a
|
||||
specified threshold. Payment occurs when the buyer consumes the goods, not
|
||||
when they arrive.
|
||||
|
||||
VMI represents a reallocation of the inventory management function: the
|
||||
buyer surrenders operational control over a specific task (replenishment)
|
||||
to the party better positioned to perform it (the supplier, who controls
|
||||
the supply side). This specialisation of function reduces transaction costs,
|
||||
improves forecast accuracy (the supplier sees real consumption, not
|
||||
batch orders), and smooths the demand signal upstream.
|
||||
|
||||
## Supply Chain Visibility
|
||||
|
||||
Supply chain visibility refers to the degree to which all participants can
|
||||
observe the state of inventory, orders, and shipments across the entire
|
||||
chain in real time. High visibility reduces the information asymmetries
|
||||
that drive the bullwhip effect and enables coordinated responses to
|
||||
disruption.
|
||||
|
||||
Modern visibility platforms aggregate data from tracking systems, IoT
|
||||
sensors, and partner APIs to provide a unified operational picture. The
|
||||
commercial value of visibility comes from reducing the cost of safety
|
||||
stock (since uncertainty is lower) and enabling faster responses to supply
|
||||
shocks. Visibility is not merely a technical feature; it is a coordination
|
||||
mechanism that changes the incentive structure for every node in the chain.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user