feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)

Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
2026-02-23 09:36:46 +01:00
parent 81a4c8796a
commit a9ca0adfcf
986 changed files with 63216 additions and 1 deletions

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
---
entity_slug: agricultural_improvement_discouragement
evaluator: null
evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T00:27:04.714138'
overall_score: 4.4
scores:
- name: definition_precision
value: 4.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: The definition is quite precise, clearly identifying specific institutional
barriers (primogeniture, entails, servile labor, etc.) and their mechanism of
preventing farmers from capturing improvement value. It avoids circularity and
captures a distinct systemic phenomenon rather than a vague concept.
- name: source_grounding
value: 5.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: This entity is directly grounded in Smith's central thesis from Book
III, Chapter 2, where he systematically analyzes how feudal institutions created
barriers to agricultural development. The specific mechanisms listed (primogeniture,
entails, insecure tenure, etc.) are explicitly discussed by Smith in this context.
- name: domain_placement
value: 5.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: The "Production" domain assignment is correct, as this entity deals with
factors affecting agricultural productivity and investment in productive improvements.
It fits naturally within Smith's analysis of what determines productive capacity
in different economic systems.
- name: vsm_relevance
value: 3.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: This entity has moderate VSM relevance, primarily mapping to S4 (intelligence/environmental
adaptation) as it represents institutional failures that prevent the economic
system from adapting and improving agricultural practices. It could also relate
to S3 (internal regulation) regarding how institutional structures govern productive
activities.
- name: explanatory_value
value: 5.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: This entity provides excellent explanatory value by illuminating the
structural mechanisms through which feudal institutions systematically discouraged
productive investment. It explains a key causal relationship in Smith's theory
of why European agriculture stagnated after the fall of Rome.
---
# Evaluation: Agricultural Improvement Discouragement
## definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0
The definition is quite precise, clearly identifying specific institutional barriers (primogeniture, entails, servile labor, etc.) and their mechanism of preventing farmers from capturing improvement value. It avoids circularity and captures a distinct systemic phenomenon rather than a vague concept.
## source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0
This entity is directly grounded in Smith's central thesis from Book III, Chapter 2, where he systematically analyzes how feudal institutions created barriers to agricultural development. The specific mechanisms listed (primogeniture, entails, insecure tenure, etc.) are explicitly discussed by Smith in this context.
## domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0
The "Production" domain assignment is correct, as this entity deals with factors affecting agricultural productivity and investment in productive improvements. It fits naturally within Smith's analysis of what determines productive capacity in different economic systems.
## vsm_relevance — 3.0 / 5.0
This entity has moderate VSM relevance, primarily mapping to S4 (intelligence/environmental adaptation) as it represents institutional failures that prevent the economic system from adapting and improving agricultural practices. It could also relate to S3 (internal regulation) regarding how institutional structures govern productive activities.
## explanatory_value — 5.0 / 5.0
This entity provides excellent explanatory value by illuminating the structural mechanisms through which feudal institutions systematically discouraged productive investment. It explains a key causal relationship in Smith's theory of why European agriculture stagnated after the fall of Rome.