feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)

Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

examples/infospace-with-history/output/evaluations/alien_merchant_duties.md

@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
+---
+entity_slug: alien_merchant_duties
+evaluator: null
+evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T00:32:46.017309'
+overall_score: 4.2
+scores:
+- name: definition_precision
+  value: 4.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: The definition clearly distinguishes alien merchant duties from general
+    tariffs by specifying they target foreign merchants operating within domestic
+    borders, with a clear protective purpose. The concept is well-bounded and non-circular,
+    though it could be slightly more precise about the mechanisms of these duties.
+- name: source_grounding
+  value: 4.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: This concept aligns well with Smith's extensive discussion of mercantile
+    policies and protectionist measures in Book IV, Chapter 3, where he critiques
+    various restrictions on foreign trade. Smith does address how domestic merchants
+    secure advantages through government policy, making this a legitimate extraction
+    from the source material.
+- name: domain_placement
+  value: 5.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: '"Regulation" is the perfect domain placement for this entity, as alien
+    merchant duties are fundamentally regulatory instruments used by governments to
+    control and restrict foreign commercial activity. This fits squarely within the
+    regulatory apparatus Smith analyzes.'
+- name: vsm_relevance
+  value: 4.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: This entity maps naturally to S3 (internal regulation) as it represents
+    the regulatory mechanisms a nation uses to control its internal commercial environment.
+    It also has some relevance to S4 (intelligence/adaptation) as these duties reflect
+    how a system responds to perceived external competitive threats.
+- name: explanatory_value
+  value: 4.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: The entity illuminates a specific mechanism of mercantile protection
+    that Smith critiques, showing how regulatory instruments create artificial advantages
+    for domestic interests. It reveals the structural relationship between government
+    policy, merchant interests, and consumer welfare that is central to Smith's analysis.
+---
+
+# Evaluation: Alien Merchant Duties
+
+## definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0
+
+The definition clearly distinguishes alien merchant duties from general tariffs by specifying they target foreign merchants operating within domestic borders, with a clear protective purpose. The concept is well-bounded and non-circular, though it could be slightly more precise about the mechanisms of these duties.
+
+## source_grounding — 4.0 / 5.0
+
+This concept aligns well with Smith's extensive discussion of mercantile policies and protectionist measures in Book IV, Chapter 3, where he critiques various restrictions on foreign trade. Smith does address how domestic merchants secure advantages through government policy, making this a legitimate extraction from the source material.
+
+## domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0
+
+"Regulation" is the perfect domain placement for this entity, as alien merchant duties are fundamentally regulatory instruments used by governments to control and restrict foreign commercial activity. This fits squarely within the regulatory apparatus Smith analyzes.
+
+## vsm_relevance — 4.0 / 5.0
+
+This entity maps naturally to S3 (internal regulation) as it represents the regulatory mechanisms a nation uses to control its internal commercial environment. It also has some relevance to S4 (intelligence/adaptation) as these duties reflect how a system responds to perceived external competitive threats.
+
+## explanatory_value — 4.0 / 5.0
+
+The entity illuminates a specific mechanism of mercantile protection that Smith critiques, showing how regulatory instruments create artificial advantages for domestic interests. It reveals the structural relationship between government policy, merchant interests, and consumer welfare that is central to Smith's analysis.