feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)

Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

examples/infospace-with-history/output/evaluations/annual_coinage_expense_justification.md

@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
+---
+entity_slug: annual_coinage_expense_justification
+evaluator: null
+evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T00:33:05.318031'
+overall_score: 4.4
+scores:
+- name: definition_precision
+  value: 4.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: The definition clearly distinguishes between unjustified coinage expenses
+    and the proper alternative of seignorage revenue generation. It captures a specific
+    economic mechanism rather than a vague concept, though it could be slightly more
+    precise about what constitutes "appropriate seignorage."
+- name: source_grounding
+  value: 5.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: This entity is directly grounded in Smith's detailed analysis in Book
+    IV, Chapter 6, where he explicitly discusses the costs of government coinage operations
+    and argues for seignorage as an alternative to gratuitous coinage. The concept
+    reflects Smith's actual reasoning rather than imposing external interpretations.
+- name: domain_placement
+  value: 5.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: The "Regulation" domain is perfectly appropriate since this concerns
+    government policy decisions about coinage operations, public expenditure justification,
+    and the regulatory choice between free coinage versus seignorage. This is fundamentally
+    about how government should regulate monetary operations.
+- name: vsm_relevance
+  value: 4.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: This entity maps well to S3 (internal regulation/audit) as it concerns
+    evaluating and justifying government expenditures, and potentially to S5 (policy)
+    regarding fundamental decisions about coinage operations. The concept has clear
+    VSM relevance in terms of organizational resource allocation and policy choices.
+- name: explanatory_value
+  value: 4.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: The entity illuminates an important structural mechanism in Smith's monetary
+    theory - how government coinage policy creates unnecessary subsidies and how proper
+    pricing (seignorage) could eliminate costs while generating revenue. It reveals
+    the economic logic behind institutional design choices rather than merely describing
+    surface phenomena.
+---
+
+# Evaluation: Annual Coinage Expense Justification
+
+## definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0
+
+The definition clearly distinguishes between unjustified coinage expenses and the proper alternative of seignorage revenue generation. It captures a specific economic mechanism rather than a vague concept, though it could be slightly more precise about what constitutes "appropriate seignorage."
+
+## source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0
+
+This entity is directly grounded in Smith's detailed analysis in Book IV, Chapter 6, where he explicitly discusses the costs of government coinage operations and argues for seignorage as an alternative to gratuitous coinage. The concept reflects Smith's actual reasoning rather than imposing external interpretations.
+
+## domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0
+
+The "Regulation" domain is perfectly appropriate since this concerns government policy decisions about coinage operations, public expenditure justification, and the regulatory choice between free coinage versus seignorage. This is fundamentally about how government should regulate monetary operations.
+
+## vsm_relevance — 4.0 / 5.0
+
+This entity maps well to S3 (internal regulation/audit) as it concerns evaluating and justifying government expenditures, and potentially to S5 (policy) regarding fundamental decisions about coinage operations. The concept has clear VSM relevance in terms of organizational resource allocation and policy choices.
+
+## explanatory_value — 4.0 / 5.0
+
+The entity illuminates an important structural mechanism in Smith's monetary theory - how government coinage policy creates unnecessary subsidies and how proper pricing (seignorage) could eliminate costs while generating revenue. It reveals the economic logic behind institutional design choices rather than merely describing surface phenomena.