feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)

Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

examples/infospace-with-history/output/evaluations/annuities_for_lives.md

@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
+---
+entity_slug: annuities_for_lives
+evaluator: null
+evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T00:34:13.662464'
+overall_score: 4.0
+scores:
+- name: definition_precision
+  value: 4.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: The definition clearly distinguishes annuities for lives from other financial
+    instruments by specifying they provide payments for the duration of specified
+    individuals' lives. It precisely captures the mechanism and governmental use case
+    without circularity.
+- name: source_grounding
+  value: 5.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: This entity is directly grounded in Smith's actual discussion in Book
+    V, Chapter 3, where he explicitly examines annuities for lives as a government
+    borrowing method and compares their use in France versus England. The definition
+    accurately reflects Smith's treatment of the concept.
+- name: domain_placement
+  value: 4.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: '"Regulation" is appropriate since Smith discusses these as instruments
+    of government financial policy and borrowing strategy. However, "Public Finance"
+    might be a more precise domain classification given the specific governmental
+    context.'
+- name: vsm_relevance
+  value: 3.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: This maps reasonably well to S3 (internal regulation) as a government
+    financial management tool, and potentially S4 (intelligence) regarding adaptation
+    to borrowing needs. However, it's primarily a financial instrument rather than
+    a core systemic function.
+- name: explanatory_value
+  value: 4.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: The entity illuminates an important mechanism of government finance and
+    reveals structural differences between national approaches to public borrowing.
+    It provides genuine insight into how governments manage debt and risk through
+    different financial instruments.
+---
+
+# Evaluation: Annuities For Lives
+
+## definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0
+
+The definition clearly distinguishes annuities for lives from other financial instruments by specifying they provide payments for the duration of specified individuals' lives. It precisely captures the mechanism and governmental use case without circularity.
+
+## source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0
+
+This entity is directly grounded in Smith's actual discussion in Book V, Chapter 3, where he explicitly examines annuities for lives as a government borrowing method and compares their use in France versus England. The definition accurately reflects Smith's treatment of the concept.
+
+## domain_placement — 4.0 / 5.0
+
+"Regulation" is appropriate since Smith discusses these as instruments of government financial policy and borrowing strategy. However, "Public Finance" might be a more precise domain classification given the specific governmental context.
+
+## vsm_relevance — 3.0 / 5.0
+
+This maps reasonably well to S3 (internal regulation) as a government financial management tool, and potentially S4 (intelligence) regarding adaptation to borrowing needs. However, it's primarily a financial instrument rather than a core systemic function.
+
+## explanatory_value — 4.0 / 5.0
+
+The entity illuminates an important mechanism of government finance and reveals structural differences between national approaches to public borrowing. It provides genuine insight into how governments manage debt and risk through different financial instruments.