feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)

Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
2026-02-23 09:36:46 +01:00
parent 81a4c8796a
commit a9ca0adfcf
986 changed files with 63216 additions and 1 deletions

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
---
entity_slug: balance_of_trade
evaluator: null
evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T00:36:58.273922'
overall_score: 4.8
scores:
- name: definition_precision
value: 5.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: The definition is mathematically precise (difference between exports
and imports) and clearly distinguishes between favorable and unfavorable balances.
It avoids circularity and captures a specific, measurable economic concept.
- name: source_grounding
value: 5.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: This entity is directly grounded in Book IV, Chapter 1, where Smith extensively
discusses and critiques the mercantile system's obsession with trade balances.
The definition accurately reflects Smith's treatment of how mercantilist thinking
connected trade balances to national wealth through precious metal flows.
- name: domain_placement
value: 5.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: The "Exchange" domain is perfectly appropriate since balance of trade
fundamentally concerns the exchange relationships between nations. This concept
sits at the heart of international commercial exchange theory.
- name: vsm_relevance
value: 4.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: This entity maps well to S4 (intelligence/environmental adaptation) as
it represents how a nation monitors and responds to its external economic environment
through trade relationships. It also connects to S5 (policy) since trade balance
concerns often drive national economic policy decisions.
- name: explanatory_value
value: 5.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: This entity provides substantial explanatory power by illuminating the
fundamental mechanism underlying mercantile economic thinking and policy formation.
It reveals the structural relationship between international trade flows and how
societies conceptualize national wealth accumulation.
---
# Evaluation: Balance Of Trade
## definition_precision — 5.0 / 5.0
The definition is mathematically precise (difference between exports and imports) and clearly distinguishes between favorable and unfavorable balances. It avoids circularity and captures a specific, measurable economic concept.
## source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0
This entity is directly grounded in Book IV, Chapter 1, where Smith extensively discusses and critiques the mercantile system's obsession with trade balances. The definition accurately reflects Smith's treatment of how mercantilist thinking connected trade balances to national wealth through precious metal flows.
## domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0
The "Exchange" domain is perfectly appropriate since balance of trade fundamentally concerns the exchange relationships between nations. This concept sits at the heart of international commercial exchange theory.
## vsm_relevance — 4.0 / 5.0
This entity maps well to S4 (intelligence/environmental adaptation) as it represents how a nation monitors and responds to its external economic environment through trade relationships. It also connects to S5 (policy) since trade balance concerns often drive national economic policy decisions.
## explanatory_value — 5.0 / 5.0
This entity provides substantial explanatory power by illuminating the fundamental mechanism underlying mercantile economic thinking and policy formation. It reveals the structural relationship between international trade flows and how societies conceptualize national wealth accumulation.