feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)

Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

examples/infospace-with-history/output/evaluations/bank_capital_adequacy.md

@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
+---
+entity_slug: bank_capital_adequacy
+evaluator: null
+evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T00:37:07.690141'
+overall_score: 4.0
+scores:
+- name: definition_precision
+  value: 4.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: The definition clearly articulates bank capital adequacy as the sufficiency
+    of capital relative to risks and obligations, with a specific functional purpose
+    (absorbing losses and maintaining operations). It avoids circularity and captures
+    a distinct financial concept, though it could be slightly more precise about measurement
+    criteria.
+- name: source_grounding
+  value: 3.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: While Smith does discuss banking capital and stability in Book II, Chapter
+    2, the modern regulatory concept of "capital adequacy" as a formal framework may
+    be somewhat anachronistic for Smith's era. The underlying principles are present
+    in Smith's work, but the specific framing reflects later banking theory developments.
+- name: domain_placement
+  value: 5.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: The "Regulation" domain assignment is perfectly appropriate, as capital
+    adequacy is fundamentally a regulatory concept concerned with prudential oversight
+    and systemic stability. This clearly belongs in the regulatory framework rather
+    than in operational or market domains.
+- name: vsm_relevance
+  value: 4.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: This entity maps well to S3 (internal regulation/audit) as it represents
+    a regulatory control mechanism that monitors and maintains system viability. It
+    also has some relevance to S2 (coordination/anti-oscillation) in preventing systemic
+    banking disruptions.
+- name: explanatory_value
+  value: 4.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: The entity provides strong explanatory power by illuminating the structural
+    relationship between capital reserves, risk management, and banking system stability.
+    It explains a key mechanism for preventing financial system failures rather than
+    merely describing a surface phenomenon.
+---
+
+# Evaluation: Bank Capital Adequacy
+
+## definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0
+
+The definition clearly articulates bank capital adequacy as the sufficiency of capital relative to risks and obligations, with a specific functional purpose (absorbing losses and maintaining operations). It avoids circularity and captures a distinct financial concept, though it could be slightly more precise about measurement criteria.
+
+## source_grounding — 3.0 / 5.0
+
+While Smith does discuss banking capital and stability in Book II, Chapter 2, the modern regulatory concept of "capital adequacy" as a formal framework may be somewhat anachronistic for Smith's era. The underlying principles are present in Smith's work, but the specific framing reflects later banking theory developments.
+
+## domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0
+
+The "Regulation" domain assignment is perfectly appropriate, as capital adequacy is fundamentally a regulatory concept concerned with prudential oversight and systemic stability. This clearly belongs in the regulatory framework rather than in operational or market domains.
+
+## vsm_relevance — 4.0 / 5.0
+
+This entity maps well to S3 (internal regulation/audit) as it represents a regulatory control mechanism that monitors and maintains system viability. It also has some relevance to S2 (coordination/anti-oscillation) in preventing systemic banking disruptions.
+
+## explanatory_value — 4.0 / 5.0
+
+The entity provides strong explanatory power by illuminating the structural relationship between capital reserves, risk management, and banking system stability. It explains a key mechanism for preventing financial system failures rather than merely describing a surface phenomenon.