feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)

Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
2026-02-23 09:36:46 +01:00
parent 81a4c8796a
commit a9ca0adfcf
986 changed files with 63216 additions and 1 deletions

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
---
entity_slug: bank_monetary_stability
evaluator: null
evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T00:43:16.219342'
overall_score: 4.0
scores:
- name: definition_precision
value: 3.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: The definition captures a meaningful concept about monetary stability
but relies on somewhat circular language ("stability requires...stable money").
It distinguishes between stabilizing and destabilizing effects of banking but
could be more precise about what constitutes "appropriate regulation."
- name: source_grounding
value: 4.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: Smith does examine banking stability extensively in Book II, Chapter
2, discussing how banks can either support or disrupt economic activity through
their money creation and credit policies. The concept aligns well with his analysis
of banking's role in economic development.
- name: domain_placement
value: 5.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: '"Regulation" is the correct domain placement, as Smith''s discussion
focuses on the regulatory and institutional conditions necessary for banks to
contribute positively to economic stability rather than cause disruption.'
- name: vsm_relevance
value: 4.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: This entity maps well to S2 (coordination/anti-oscillation) as it concerns
preventing monetary instability that could cause economic oscillations, and partially
to S3 (internal regulation) regarding prudent bank management and oversight mechanisms.
- name: explanatory_value
value: 4.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: The entity illuminates an important structural relationship between banking
practices and broader economic stability, explaining how monetary institutions
can either amplify or dampen economic fluctuations. This goes beyond surface description
to identify a key systemic mechanism.
---
# Evaluation: Bank Monetary Stability
## definition_precision — 3.0 / 5.0
The definition captures a meaningful concept about monetary stability but relies on somewhat circular language ("stability requires...stable money"). It distinguishes between stabilizing and destabilizing effects of banking but could be more precise about what constitutes "appropriate regulation."
## source_grounding — 4.0 / 5.0
Smith does examine banking stability extensively in Book II, Chapter 2, discussing how banks can either support or disrupt economic activity through their money creation and credit policies. The concept aligns well with his analysis of banking's role in economic development.
## domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0
"Regulation" is the correct domain placement, as Smith's discussion focuses on the regulatory and institutional conditions necessary for banks to contribute positively to economic stability rather than cause disruption.
## vsm_relevance — 4.0 / 5.0
This entity maps well to S2 (coordination/anti-oscillation) as it concerns preventing monetary instability that could cause economic oscillations, and partially to S3 (internal regulation) regarding prudent bank management and oversight mechanisms.
## explanatory_value — 4.0 / 5.0
The entity illuminates an important structural relationship between banking practices and broader economic stability, explaining how monetary institutions can either amplify or dampen economic fluctuations. This goes beyond surface description to identify a key systemic mechanism.