feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)

Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

examples/infospace-with-history/output/evaluations/bank_regulatory_compliance.md

@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
+---
+entity_slug: bank_regulatory_compliance
+evaluator: null
+evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T00:49:04.715687'
+overall_score: 3.0
+scores:
+- name: definition_precision
+  value: 3.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: The definition is reasonably clear but somewhat circular, defining compliance
+    as "adherence to regulatory requirements" without specifying what those requirements
+    entail. It captures a distinct concept but could be more precise about the mechanisms
+    and scope of compliance.
+- name: source_grounding
+  value: 2.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: While Smith discusses banking regulation in Book II, Chapter 2, the modern
+    concept of "regulatory compliance" as a distinct institutional practice is anachronistic
+    for Smith's era. Smith focuses more on the principles of sound banking rather
+    than formal compliance frameworks.
+- name: domain_placement
+  value: 4.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: The "Regulation" domain is appropriate since this entity deals with adherence
+    to regulatory standards. However, it could also fit within a "Banking" or "Financial
+    Institutions" domain given its specific focus on bank operations.
+- name: vsm_relevance
+  value: 4.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: This entity maps well to S3 (internal regulation/audit) as it represents
+    the internal monitoring and control mechanisms that ensure adherence to external
+    standards. It also has some relevance to S2 (coordination) in preventing systemic
+    oscillations.
+- name: explanatory_value
+  value: 2.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: The entity primarily names a surface phenomenon rather than illuminating
+    underlying mechanisms. It doesn't explain how compliance actually works or what
+    specific regulatory mechanisms Smith advocated for banking stability.
+---
+
+# Evaluation: Bank Regulatory Compliance
+
+## definition_precision — 3.0 / 5.0
+
+The definition is reasonably clear but somewhat circular, defining compliance as "adherence to regulatory requirements" without specifying what those requirements entail. It captures a distinct concept but could be more precise about the mechanisms and scope of compliance.
+
+## source_grounding — 2.0 / 5.0
+
+While Smith discusses banking regulation in Book II, Chapter 2, the modern concept of "regulatory compliance" as a distinct institutional practice is anachronistic for Smith's era. Smith focuses more on the principles of sound banking rather than formal compliance frameworks.
+
+## domain_placement — 4.0 / 5.0
+
+The "Regulation" domain is appropriate since this entity deals with adherence to regulatory standards. However, it could also fit within a "Banking" or "Financial Institutions" domain given its specific focus on bank operations.
+
+## vsm_relevance — 4.0 / 5.0
+
+This entity maps well to S3 (internal regulation/audit) as it represents the internal monitoring and control mechanisms that ensure adherence to external standards. It also has some relevance to S2 (coordination) in preventing systemic oscillations.
+
+## explanatory_value — 2.0 / 5.0
+
+The entity primarily names a surface phenomenon rather than illuminating underlying mechanisms. It doesn't explain how compliance actually works or what specific regulatory mechanisms Smith advocated for banking stability.