feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)

Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

examples/infospace-with-history/output/evaluations/bounties_on_exportation.md

@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
+---
+entity_slug: bounties_on_exportation
+evaluator: null
+evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T04:38:40.887766'
+overall_score: 4.8
+scores:
+- name: definition_precision
+  value: 5.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: The definition is highly precise and non-circular, clearly distinguishing
+    bounties on exportation as government subsidies specifically for exported goods,
+    with explicit mention of their funding mechanism (taxpayers) and intended purpose
+    (foreign market competitiveness). It captures a distinct policy instrument rather
+    than a vague concept.
+- name: source_grounding
+  value: 5.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: This entity is directly grounded in Smith's actual analysis in Book IV,
+    Chapter 8, where he extensively examines export bounties as a key mercantile policy
+    tool. The definition accurately reflects Smith's critique of how these subsidies
+    benefit specific producers at the expense of consumers and taxpayers.
+- name: domain_placement
+  value: 5.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: The "Regulation" domain assignment is perfectly appropriate, as bounties
+    on exportation represent a specific form of government intervention in markets.
+    This is clearly a regulatory mechanism rather than a natural market phenomenon
+    or theoretical abstraction.
+- name: vsm_relevance
+  value: 4.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: This entity maps well to S3 (internal regulation) as it represents a
+    government's attempt to regulate its economic system's performance in international
+    markets. It could also relate to S4 (intelligence/adaptation) as a response to
+    perceived foreign competition, giving it clear VSM relevance.
+- name: explanatory_value
+  value: 5.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: The entity provides excellent explanatory power by illuminating the specific
+    mechanism through which mercantilist policies attempt to boost exports, including
+    the underlying cost structure (taxpayer funding) and distributional effects (producer
+    benefits vs. consumer costs). It reveals important structural relations in Smith's
+    critique of mercantilism.
+---
+
+# Evaluation: Bounties On Exportation
+
+## definition_precision — 5.0 / 5.0
+
+The definition is highly precise and non-circular, clearly distinguishing bounties on exportation as government subsidies specifically for exported goods, with explicit mention of their funding mechanism (taxpayers) and intended purpose (foreign market competitiveness). It captures a distinct policy instrument rather than a vague concept.
+
+## source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0
+
+This entity is directly grounded in Smith's actual analysis in Book IV, Chapter 8, where he extensively examines export bounties as a key mercantile policy tool. The definition accurately reflects Smith's critique of how these subsidies benefit specific producers at the expense of consumers and taxpayers.
+
+## domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0
+
+The "Regulation" domain assignment is perfectly appropriate, as bounties on exportation represent a specific form of government intervention in markets. This is clearly a regulatory mechanism rather than a natural market phenomenon or theoretical abstraction.
+
+## vsm_relevance — 4.0 / 5.0
+
+This entity maps well to S3 (internal regulation) as it represents a government's attempt to regulate its economic system's performance in international markets. It could also relate to S4 (intelligence/adaptation) as a response to perceived foreign competition, giving it clear VSM relevance.
+
+## explanatory_value — 5.0 / 5.0
+
+The entity provides excellent explanatory power by illuminating the specific mechanism through which mercantilist policies attempt to boost exports, including the underlying cost structure (taxpayer funding) and distributional effects (producer benefits vs. consumer costs). It reveals important structural relations in Smith's critique of mercantilism.