feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)

Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
2026-02-23 09:36:46 +01:00
parent 81a4c8796a
commit a9ca0adfcf
986 changed files with 63216 additions and 1 deletions

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
---
entity_slug: circulation_of_money
evaluator: null
evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T04:43:11.976659'
overall_score: 4.2
scores:
- name: definition_precision
value: 4.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: The definition clearly captures the continuous movement aspect of money
and its role in facilitating transactions. It avoids circularity by explaining
the function (distributing revenue, enabling exchanges) rather than just restating
"circulation."
- name: source_grounding
value: 5.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: This concept is directly grounded in Book II, Chapter 2, where Smith
explicitly analyzes how money circulates through the economy and distinguishes
between the circulation of money versus the circulation of goods. The entity accurately
reflects Smith's actual discussion.
- name: domain_placement
value: 5.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: '"Exchange" is the correct domain placement since circulation of money
is fundamentally about the medium that enables exchanges between parties. This
is a core mechanism of how exchange systems function in Smith''s analysis.'
- name: vsm_relevance
value: 3.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: This entity has moderate VSM relevance, potentially mapping to S1 (as
a primary operational mechanism) or S2 (as a coordination mechanism that prevents
transaction bottlenecks). However, it's somewhat abstract and could be considered
a foundational process that underlies multiple VSM systems.
- name: explanatory_value
value: 4.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: This entity provides strong explanatory value by illuminating the mechanism
through which economic transactions are facilitated and revenue is distributed
throughout society. It explains a fundamental structural process rather than merely
naming a surface phenomenon.
---
# Evaluation: Circulation Of Money
## definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0
The definition clearly captures the continuous movement aspect of money and its role in facilitating transactions. It avoids circularity by explaining the function (distributing revenue, enabling exchanges) rather than just restating "circulation."
## source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0
This concept is directly grounded in Book II, Chapter 2, where Smith explicitly analyzes how money circulates through the economy and distinguishes between the circulation of money versus the circulation of goods. The entity accurately reflects Smith's actual discussion.
## domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0
"Exchange" is the correct domain placement since circulation of money is fundamentally about the medium that enables exchanges between parties. This is a core mechanism of how exchange systems function in Smith's analysis.
## vsm_relevance — 3.0 / 5.0
This entity has moderate VSM relevance, potentially mapping to S1 (as a primary operational mechanism) or S2 (as a coordination mechanism that prevents transaction bottlenecks). However, it's somewhat abstract and could be considered a foundational process that underlies multiple VSM systems.
## explanatory_value — 4.0 / 5.0
This entity provides strong explanatory value by illuminating the mechanism through which economic transactions are facilitated and revenue is distributed throughout society. It explains a fundamental structural process rather than merely naming a surface phenomenon.