feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)

Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

examples/infospace-with-history/output/evaluations/colonial_dependency_structure.md

@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
+---
+entity_slug: colonial_dependency_structure
+evaluator: null
+evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T04:44:30.755607'
+overall_score: 4.6
+scores:
+- name: definition_precision
+  value: 4.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: The definition clearly identifies three specific components (political
+    control, economic monopoly, military protection) and their mutual dependency effects.
+    It avoids circularity and captures a distinct structural relationship rather than
+    a vague concept.
+- name: source_grounding
+  value: 5.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: This entity is directly grounded in Smith's extensive analysis of colonial
+    systems in Book IV, Chapter 7, where he systematically examines the political,
+    economic, and military dimensions of colonial relationships. Smith explicitly
+    discusses how these dependencies create costs for both parties.
+- name: domain_placement
+  value: 5.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: '"Regulation" is the correct domain placement as this entity describes
+    institutional structures that govern economic relationships between political
+    entities. The colonial system represents a form of regulatory framework that shapes
+    trade, investment, and resource allocation.'
+- name: vsm_relevance
+  value: 4.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: This entity maps well to multiple VSM systems - S3 (internal regulation
+    of colonial territories), S4 (intelligence gathering and environmental adaptation
+    across territories), and S5 (policy identity of the imperial system). The hierarchical
+    control structure aligns naturally with VSM's cybernetic perspective.
+- name: explanatory_value
+  value: 5.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: This entity provides significant explanatory power by illuminating the
+    structural mechanisms that create economic inefficiencies and political tensions
+    in colonial relationships. It explains how institutional arrangements can generate
+    net costs despite appearing beneficial to particular interest groups.
+---
+
+# Evaluation: Colonial Dependency Structure
+
+## definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0
+
+The definition clearly identifies three specific components (political control, economic monopoly, military protection) and their mutual dependency effects. It avoids circularity and captures a distinct structural relationship rather than a vague concept.
+
+## source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0
+
+This entity is directly grounded in Smith's extensive analysis of colonial systems in Book IV, Chapter 7, where he systematically examines the political, economic, and military dimensions of colonial relationships. Smith explicitly discusses how these dependencies create costs for both parties.
+
+## domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0
+
+"Regulation" is the correct domain placement as this entity describes institutional structures that govern economic relationships between political entities. The colonial system represents a form of regulatory framework that shapes trade, investment, and resource allocation.
+
+## vsm_relevance — 4.0 / 5.0
+
+This entity maps well to multiple VSM systems - S3 (internal regulation of colonial territories), S4 (intelligence gathering and environmental adaptation across territories), and S5 (policy identity of the imperial system). The hierarchical control structure aligns naturally with VSM's cybernetic perspective.
+
+## explanatory_value — 5.0 / 5.0
+
+This entity provides significant explanatory power by illuminating the structural mechanisms that create economic inefficiencies and political tensions in colonial relationships. It explains how institutional arrangements can generate net costs despite appearing beneficial to particular interest groups.