feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)

Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

examples/infospace-with-history/output/evaluations/colonial_economic_system_implementation.md

@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
+---
+entity_slug: colonial_economic_system_implementation
+evaluator: null
+evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T04:49:04.542833'
+overall_score: 4.0
+scores:
+- name: definition_precision
+  value: 3.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: The definition captures a distinct concept about practical application
+    of colonial policies, but uses somewhat vague terms like "different approaches"
+    and "implementation quality" without specifying what constitutes good vs. poor
+    implementation. It avoids circularity but could be more precise about the mechanisms
+    involved.
+- name: source_grounding
+  value: 4.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: This entity appears well-grounded in Smith's actual analysis of colonial
+    policy implementation in Book IV, Chapter 7, where he does examine how monopoly
+    systems fail in practice and argues for more open arrangements. The contrast between
+    monopoly and open implementation approaches reflects Smith's documented arguments.
+- name: domain_placement
+  value: 5.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: '"Regulation" is the correct domain placement, as this entity specifically
+    concerns the practical mechanisms of implementing and enforcing colonial trade
+    regulations and administrative structures. This is fundamentally about regulatory
+    systems rather than production, exchange, or distribution.'
+- name: vsm_relevance
+  value: 4.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: This entity maps naturally to S3 (internal regulation/audit) as it concerns
+    the implementation and enforcement of colonial policies, and potentially S2 (coordination)
+    regarding administrative structures. The focus on "enforcement mechanisms" and
+    "administrative structures" aligns well with VSM regulatory functions.
+- name: explanatory_value
+  value: 4.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: This entity provides genuine explanatory power by highlighting that policy
+    effectiveness depends not just on design but on implementation quality, and that
+    different policy approaches (monopoly vs. open) have different implementation
+    challenges. It illuminates a key mechanism in Smith's colonial analysis rather
+    than just naming a surface phenomenon.
+---
+
+# Evaluation: Colonial Economic System Implementation
+
+## definition_precision — 3.0 / 5.0
+
+The definition captures a distinct concept about practical application of colonial policies, but uses somewhat vague terms like "different approaches" and "implementation quality" without specifying what constitutes good vs. poor implementation. It avoids circularity but could be more precise about the mechanisms involved.
+
+## source_grounding — 4.0 / 5.0
+
+This entity appears well-grounded in Smith's actual analysis of colonial policy implementation in Book IV, Chapter 7, where he does examine how monopoly systems fail in practice and argues for more open arrangements. The contrast between monopoly and open implementation approaches reflects Smith's documented arguments.
+
+## domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0
+
+"Regulation" is the correct domain placement, as this entity specifically concerns the practical mechanisms of implementing and enforcing colonial trade regulations and administrative structures. This is fundamentally about regulatory systems rather than production, exchange, or distribution.
+
+## vsm_relevance — 4.0 / 5.0
+
+This entity maps naturally to S3 (internal regulation/audit) as it concerns the implementation and enforcement of colonial policies, and potentially S2 (coordination) regarding administrative structures. The focus on "enforcement mechanisms" and "administrative structures" aligns well with VSM regulatory functions.
+
+## explanatory_value — 4.0 / 5.0
+
+This entity provides genuine explanatory power by highlighting that policy effectiveness depends not just on design but on implementation quality, and that different policy approaches (monopoly vs. open) have different implementation challenges. It illuminates a key mechanism in Smith's colonial analysis rather than just naming a surface phenomenon.