feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)

Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

examples/infospace-with-history/output/evaluations/colonial_revenue_potential.md

@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
+---
+entity_slug: colonial_revenue_potential
+evaluator: null
+evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T04:51:52.922052'
+overall_score: 4.4
+scores:
+- name: definition_precision
+  value: 4.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: The definition clearly distinguishes between actual revenue generation
+    capacity versus realized revenue, with specific components (taxation, trade duties)
+    and contextual factors (economic development, population, commercial activity).
+    The contrast with monopoly-focused approaches adds precision rather than circularity.
+- name: source_grounding
+  value: 5.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: This concept is directly grounded in Smith's extensive analysis in Book
+    IV, Chapter 7, where he explicitly discusses colonial taxation potential and argues
+    that systematic revenue collection would be superior to the monopoly system. The
+    entity accurately reflects Smith's specific arguments about untapped colonial
+    fiscal capacity.
+- name: domain_placement
+  value: 5.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: '"Regulation" is the correct domain placement as this concept deals with
+    systematic governance mechanisms for revenue collection and fiscal administration.
+    It represents a regulatory framework rather than pure trade or production activity.'
+- name: vsm_relevance
+  value: 4.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: This entity maps well to S3 (internal regulation/audit) as it concerns
+    systematic revenue collection and fiscal oversight within the imperial system.
+    It also has some S4 relevance regarding intelligence about colonial economic capacity
+    for policy adaptation.
+- name: explanatory_value
+  value: 4.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: The entity illuminates a key structural mechanism in Smith's colonial
+    analysis - the tension between monopoly extraction and systematic fiscal development.
+    It explains why current colonial policy fails to realize potential benefits and
+    suggests an alternative governance approach.
+---
+
+# Evaluation: Colonial Revenue Potential
+
+## definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0
+
+The definition clearly distinguishes between actual revenue generation capacity versus realized revenue, with specific components (taxation, trade duties) and contextual factors (economic development, population, commercial activity). The contrast with monopoly-focused approaches adds precision rather than circularity.
+
+## source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0
+
+This concept is directly grounded in Smith's extensive analysis in Book IV, Chapter 7, where he explicitly discusses colonial taxation potential and argues that systematic revenue collection would be superior to the monopoly system. The entity accurately reflects Smith's specific arguments about untapped colonial fiscal capacity.
+
+## domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0
+
+"Regulation" is the correct domain placement as this concept deals with systematic governance mechanisms for revenue collection and fiscal administration. It represents a regulatory framework rather than pure trade or production activity.
+
+## vsm_relevance — 4.0 / 5.0
+
+This entity maps well to S3 (internal regulation/audit) as it concerns systematic revenue collection and fiscal oversight within the imperial system. It also has some S4 relevance regarding intelligence about colonial economic capacity for policy adaptation.
+
+## explanatory_value — 4.0 / 5.0
+
+The entity illuminates a key structural mechanism in Smith's colonial analysis - the tension between monopoly extraction and systematic fiscal development. It explains why current colonial policy fails to realize potential benefits and suggests an alternative governance approach.