feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)

Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
2026-02-23 09:36:46 +01:00
parent 81a4c8796a
commit a9ca0adfcf
986 changed files with 63216 additions and 1 deletions

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
---
entity_slug: colony_economic_freedom
evaluator: null
evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T04:52:43.572510'
overall_score: 4.2
scores:
- name: definition_precision
value: 4.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: The definition clearly distinguishes colony economic freedom from metropolitan
control, specifying key elements like trade, investment, and development according
to comparative advantage. It avoids circularity and captures a distinct concept,
though it could be slightly more precise about what constitutes "constraints by
metropolitan economic interests."
- name: source_grounding
value: 5.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: This entity is strongly grounded in Smith's actual arguments in Book
V, Chapter 3, where he explicitly discusses colonial economic policy and advocates
for greater freedom for colonies to pursue their economic interests. Smith directly
argues that such freedom would benefit both colonies and mother countries through
more efficient resource allocation.
- name: domain_placement
value: 5.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: The "Regulation" domain assignment is highly appropriate, as colonial
economic freedom fundamentally concerns the regulatory framework governing colonial
trade, investment, and economic development. This is clearly a matter of economic
regulation and policy rather than production, exchange, or distribution per se.
- name: vsm_relevance
value: 3.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: This entity has moderate VSM relevance, primarily mapping to S4 (intelligence/environmental
adaptation) as it concerns how economic systems adapt to local conditions and
comparative advantages. However, it also touches on S5 (identity/policy) regarding
the fundamental policy framework governing colonial economies, making it somewhat
distributed across systems.
- name: explanatory_value
value: 4.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: The entity provides strong explanatory value by illuminating the structural
relationship between metropolitan control and colonial economic efficiency. It
helps explain Smith's mechanism whereby reducing regulatory constraints allows
better resource allocation and mutual benefit, rather than merely naming a policy
preference.
---
# Evaluation: Colony Economic Freedom
## definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0
The definition clearly distinguishes colony economic freedom from metropolitan control, specifying key elements like trade, investment, and development according to comparative advantage. It avoids circularity and captures a distinct concept, though it could be slightly more precise about what constitutes "constraints by metropolitan economic interests."
## source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0
This entity is strongly grounded in Smith's actual arguments in Book V, Chapter 3, where he explicitly discusses colonial economic policy and advocates for greater freedom for colonies to pursue their economic interests. Smith directly argues that such freedom would benefit both colonies and mother countries through more efficient resource allocation.
## domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0
The "Regulation" domain assignment is highly appropriate, as colonial economic freedom fundamentally concerns the regulatory framework governing colonial trade, investment, and economic development. This is clearly a matter of economic regulation and policy rather than production, exchange, or distribution per se.
## vsm_relevance — 3.0 / 5.0
This entity has moderate VSM relevance, primarily mapping to S4 (intelligence/environmental adaptation) as it concerns how economic systems adapt to local conditions and comparative advantages. However, it also touches on S5 (identity/policy) regarding the fundamental policy framework governing colonial economies, making it somewhat distributed across systems.
## explanatory_value — 4.0 / 5.0
The entity provides strong explanatory value by illuminating the structural relationship between metropolitan control and colonial economic efficiency. It helps explain Smith's mechanism whereby reducing regulatory constraints allows better resource allocation and mutual benefit, rather than merely naming a policy preference.