feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)

Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

examples/infospace-with-history/output/evaluations/colony_economic_system_sustainability.md

@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
+---
+entity_slug: colony_economic_system_sustainability
+evaluator: null
+evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T04:56:07.942612'
+overall_score: 2.6
+scores:
+- name: definition_precision
+  value: 2.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: The definition is overly broad and vague, combining environmental, social,
+    and economic sustainability in ways that Smith wouldn't have conceptualized. It
+    lacks precision about what specifically constitutes "sustainability" in colonial
+    contexts and reads more like a modern sustainability framework than an 18th-century
+    economic concept.
+- name: source_grounding
+  value: 2.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: While Smith does discuss colonial economic arrangements and their long-term
+    viability, the explicit framing of "sustainability" with environmental and social
+    dimensions is anachronistic. Smith's concerns were more about economic efficiency
+    and natural development rather than modern sustainability concepts.
+- name: domain_placement
+  value: 3.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: The "Accumulation" domain is reasonable since colonial systems relate
+    to wealth generation and capital formation. However, the entity might better fit
+    in a domain focused on trade policy or colonial administration given its emphasis
+    on systemic arrangements rather than accumulation processes per se.
+- name: vsm_relevance
+  value: 4.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: This entity maps well to S4 (intelligence/environmental adaptation) as
+    it concerns how colonial systems adapt to maintain long-term viability, and potentially
+    S5 (identity/policy) regarding the fundamental principles governing colonial economic
+    arrangements. The VSM lens adds genuine analytical value here.
+- name: explanatory_value
+  value: 2.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: The entity doesn't illuminate specific mechanisms or structural relations
+    that Smith identified, instead creating a high-level abstraction that obscures
+    rather than clarifies his actual arguments about colonial trade and development.
+    It names a modern concept rather than explaining Smith's reasoning about colonial
+    economics.
+---
+
+# Evaluation: Colony Economic System Sustainability
+
+## definition_precision — 2.0 / 5.0
+
+The definition is overly broad and vague, combining environmental, social, and economic sustainability in ways that Smith wouldn't have conceptualized. It lacks precision about what specifically constitutes "sustainability" in colonial contexts and reads more like a modern sustainability framework than an 18th-century economic concept.
+
+## source_grounding — 2.0 / 5.0
+
+While Smith does discuss colonial economic arrangements and their long-term viability, the explicit framing of "sustainability" with environmental and social dimensions is anachronistic. Smith's concerns were more about economic efficiency and natural development rather than modern sustainability concepts.
+
+## domain_placement — 3.0 / 5.0
+
+The "Accumulation" domain is reasonable since colonial systems relate to wealth generation and capital formation. However, the entity might better fit in a domain focused on trade policy or colonial administration given its emphasis on systemic arrangements rather than accumulation processes per se.
+
+## vsm_relevance — 4.0 / 5.0
+
+This entity maps well to S4 (intelligence/environmental adaptation) as it concerns how colonial systems adapt to maintain long-term viability, and potentially S5 (identity/policy) regarding the fundamental principles governing colonial economic arrangements. The VSM lens adds genuine analytical value here.
+
+## explanatory_value — 2.0 / 5.0
+
+The entity doesn't illuminate specific mechanisms or structural relations that Smith identified, instead creating a high-level abstraction that obscures rather than clarifies his actual arguments about colonial trade and development. It names a modern concept rather than explaining Smith's reasoning about colonial economics.