feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)

Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

examples/infospace-with-history/output/evaluations/combination_of_workmen.md

@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
+---
+entity_slug: combination_of_workmen
+evaluator: null
+evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T04:56:59.981537'
+overall_score: 4.2
+scores:
+- name: definition_precision
+  value: 4.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: The definition is quite precise, clearly describing collective action
+    by laborers to raise wages through coordinated efforts. It captures a distinct
+    concept with specific characteristics (violence, clamor, outcomes) rather than
+    being a vague umbrella term.
+- name: source_grounding
+  value: 5.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: This entity is directly grounded in Smith's text from Book I, Chapter
+    8, where he explicitly discusses combinations of workmen and their characteristics.
+    The description accurately reflects Smith's observations about their frequency,
+    methods, and typical outcomes.
+- name: domain_placement
+  value: 5.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: The "Regulation" domain assignment is correct, as combinations of workmen
+    represent attempts to regulate wage levels through collective action. This fits
+    perfectly within the broader regulatory framework of labor market dynamics that
+    Smith analyzes.
+- name: vsm_relevance
+  value: 3.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: This entity has moderate VSM relevance, potentially mapping to S2 (coordination
+    among workers) or S4 (environmental adaptation to wage pressures). However, it's
+    primarily a reactive phenomenon rather than a systematic organizational function,
+    making the VSM mapping somewhat forced.
+- name: explanatory_value
+  value: 4.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: The entity provides good explanatory value by illuminating the structural
+    power imbalance between workers and employers and the mechanisms workers use to
+    attempt wage increases. It reveals important dynamics about collective action
+    and market regulation, though it's more descriptive of outcomes than underlying
+    mechanisms.
+---
+
+# Evaluation: Combination Of Workmen
+
+## definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0
+
+The definition is quite precise, clearly describing collective action by laborers to raise wages through coordinated efforts. It captures a distinct concept with specific characteristics (violence, clamor, outcomes) rather than being a vague umbrella term.
+
+## source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0
+
+This entity is directly grounded in Smith's text from Book I, Chapter 8, where he explicitly discusses combinations of workmen and their characteristics. The description accurately reflects Smith's observations about their frequency, methods, and typical outcomes.
+
+## domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0
+
+The "Regulation" domain assignment is correct, as combinations of workmen represent attempts to regulate wage levels through collective action. This fits perfectly within the broader regulatory framework of labor market dynamics that Smith analyzes.
+
+## vsm_relevance — 3.0 / 5.0
+
+This entity has moderate VSM relevance, potentially mapping to S2 (coordination among workers) or S4 (environmental adaptation to wage pressures). However, it's primarily a reactive phenomenon rather than a systematic organizational function, making the VSM mapping somewhat forced.
+
+## explanatory_value — 4.0 / 5.0
+
+The entity provides good explanatory value by illuminating the structural power imbalance between workers and employers and the mechanisms workers use to attempt wage increases. It reveals important dynamics about collective action and market regulation, though it's more descriptive of outcomes than underlying mechanisms.