feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)

Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

examples/infospace-with-history/output/evaluations/commercial_hospitality_contrast.md

@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
+---
+entity_slug: commercial_hospitality_contrast
+evaluator: null
+evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T04:58:09.000880'
+overall_score: 4.4
+scores:
+- name: definition_precision
+  value: 4.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: The definition clearly distinguishes between two specific modes of wealth
+    consumption - traditional hospitality maintaining retainers versus modern commercial
+    spending on manufactured goods. It captures a distinct structural transformation
+    rather than a vague concept, though it could be slightly more concise.
+- name: source_grounding
+  value: 5.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: This entity is directly grounded in Smith's historical analysis in Book
+    III, Chapter 4, where he explicitly contrasts medieval/Highland hospitality patterns
+    with commercial society's consumption patterns. The examples of medieval England
+    and Scottish Highlands are authentic to Smith's text.
+- name: domain_placement
+  value: 5.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: The "Consumption" domain placement is precisely correct, as this entity
+    fundamentally concerns how wealth is consumed and spent. The contrast between
+    hospitality-based and commercial consumption patterns is a core consumption theory
+    concept.
+- name: vsm_relevance
+  value: 3.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: This entity has moderate VSM relevance, potentially mapping to S4 (intelligence/adaptation)
+    as it describes how economic systems adapt their consumption patterns in response
+    to environmental changes like the availability of manufactured goods. However,
+    it's more of a historical transition description than an active system function.
+- name: explanatory_value
+  value: 5.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: This entity provides excellent explanatory power by illuminating the
+    mechanism through which commerce transformed social power structures - showing
+    how changed consumption patterns broke the dependency relationships that sustained
+    feudal authority. It reveals a crucial structural relationship between economic
+    and political organization.
+---
+
+# Evaluation: Commercial Hospitality Contrast
+
+## definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0
+
+The definition clearly distinguishes between two specific modes of wealth consumption - traditional hospitality maintaining retainers versus modern commercial spending on manufactured goods. It captures a distinct structural transformation rather than a vague concept, though it could be slightly more concise.
+
+## source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0
+
+This entity is directly grounded in Smith's historical analysis in Book III, Chapter 4, where he explicitly contrasts medieval/Highland hospitality patterns with commercial society's consumption patterns. The examples of medieval England and Scottish Highlands are authentic to Smith's text.
+
+## domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0
+
+The "Consumption" domain placement is precisely correct, as this entity fundamentally concerns how wealth is consumed and spent. The contrast between hospitality-based and commercial consumption patterns is a core consumption theory concept.
+
+## vsm_relevance — 3.0 / 5.0
+
+This entity has moderate VSM relevance, potentially mapping to S4 (intelligence/adaptation) as it describes how economic systems adapt their consumption patterns in response to environmental changes like the availability of manufactured goods. However, it's more of a historical transition description than an active system function.
+
+## explanatory_value — 5.0 / 5.0
+
+This entity provides excellent explanatory power by illuminating the mechanism through which commerce transformed social power structures - showing how changed consumption patterns broke the dependency relationships that sustained feudal authority. It reveals a crucial structural relationship between economic and political organization.