feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)

Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
2026-02-23 09:36:46 +01:00
parent 81a4c8796a
commit a9ca0adfcf
986 changed files with 63216 additions and 1 deletions

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
---
entity_slug: commercial_system_enrichment_mechanism
evaluator: null
evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T05:00:00.803880'
overall_score: 4.4
scores:
- name: definition_precision
value: 4.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: The definition clearly articulates the specific mercantilist mechanism
involving precious metals accumulation through trade surpluses and government
intervention. It avoids circularity and identifies distinct policy tools (tariffs,
bounties, monopolies) that constitute the mechanism.
- name: source_grounding
value: 5.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: This entity is directly grounded in Smith's extensive critique of mercantilism
throughout Book IV, Chapter 3, where he systematically examines how mercantilist
policies aim to achieve national enrichment through the described mechanisms.
The entity accurately reflects Smith's characterization of mercantilist theory
and practice.
- name: domain_placement
value: 5.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: '"General Theory" is the appropriate domain placement since this represents
a comprehensive theoretical framework that mercantilists used to justify various
specific policies. It operates at the level of overarching economic doctrine rather
than particular mechanisms or applications.'
- name: vsm_relevance
value: 3.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: This entity maps primarily to S4 (intelligence/environmental adaptation)
as it represents a flawed national strategy for responding to international economic
competition. However, it's somewhat abstract as a theoretical framework rather
than an operational system component.
- name: explanatory_value
value: 5.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: This entity provides excellent explanatory power by identifying the core
logic that unified diverse mercantilist policies, helping explain why Smith viewed
these seemingly disparate interventions as manifestations of a single misguided
theoretical framework. It illuminates the structural relationship between mercantilist
theory and policy practice.
---
# Evaluation: Commercial System Enrichment Mechanism
## definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0
The definition clearly articulates the specific mercantilist mechanism involving precious metals accumulation through trade surpluses and government intervention. It avoids circularity and identifies distinct policy tools (tariffs, bounties, monopolies) that constitute the mechanism.
## source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0
This entity is directly grounded in Smith's extensive critique of mercantilism throughout Book IV, Chapter 3, where he systematically examines how mercantilist policies aim to achieve national enrichment through the described mechanisms. The entity accurately reflects Smith's characterization of mercantilist theory and practice.
## domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0
"General Theory" is the appropriate domain placement since this represents a comprehensive theoretical framework that mercantilists used to justify various specific policies. It operates at the level of overarching economic doctrine rather than particular mechanisms or applications.
## vsm_relevance — 3.0 / 5.0
This entity maps primarily to S4 (intelligence/environmental adaptation) as it represents a flawed national strategy for responding to international economic competition. However, it's somewhat abstract as a theoretical framework rather than an operational system component.
## explanatory_value — 5.0 / 5.0
This entity provides excellent explanatory power by identifying the core logic that unified diverse mercantilist policies, helping explain why Smith viewed these seemingly disparate interventions as manifestations of a single misguided theoretical framework. It illuminates the structural relationship between mercantilist theory and policy practice.