feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)

Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

examples/infospace-with-history/output/evaluations/duties_on_importation.md

@@ -0,0 +1,54 @@
+---
+entity_slug: duties_on_importation
+evaluator: null
+evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T05:08:14.163703'
+overall_score: 4.5
+scores:
+- name: definition_precision
+  value: 4.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: The definition is clear and precise, distinguishing import duties from
+    other types of taxes and explaining their specific mechanism of raising prices
+    to protect domestic producers. It avoids circularity and captures the essential
+    economic function without being overly broad.
+- name: source_grounding
+  value: 5.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: The "Regulation" domain assignment is perfectly appropriate, as import
+    duties represent a key regulatory tool used by governments to intervene in international
+    trade. This fits squarely within Smith's analysis of regulatory mechanisms that
+    interfere with natural liberty.
+- name: vsm_relevance
+  value: 4.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: Import duties map well to S3 (internal regulation) as they represent
+    the economic system's regulatory mechanisms for controlling flows across system
+    boundaries. They also have S4 relevance as they reflect how the system responds
+    to external competitive pressures, though sometimes maladaptively.
+- name: explanatory_value
+  value: 5.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: "This entity provides excellent explanatory power by illuminating the\
+    \ specific mechanism through which protectionist policies operate\u2014raising\
+    \ prices to shield domestic producers from competition. It reveals the structural\
+    \ relationship between government intervention, market prices, and competitive\
+    \ dynamics that is central to Smith's critique of mercantilism."
+---
+
+# Evaluation: Duties On Importation
+
+## definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0
+
+The definition is clear and precise, distinguishing import duties from other types of taxes and explaining their specific mechanism of raising prices to protect domestic producers. It avoids circularity and captures the essential economic function without being overly broad.
+
+## source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0
+
+The "Regulation" domain assignment is perfectly appropriate, as import duties represent a key regulatory tool used by governments to intervene in international trade. This fits squarely within Smith's analysis of regulatory mechanisms that interfere with natural liberty.
+
+## vsm_relevance — 4.0 / 5.0
+
+Import duties map well to S3 (internal regulation) as they represent the economic system's regulatory mechanisms for controlling flows across system boundaries. They also have S4 relevance as they reflect how the system responds to external competitive pressures, though sometimes maladaptively.
+
+## explanatory_value — 5.0 / 5.0
+
+This entity provides excellent explanatory power by illuminating the specific mechanism through which protectionist policies operate—raising prices to shield domestic producers from competition. It reveals the structural relationship between government intervention, market prices, and competitive dynamics that is central to Smith's critique of mercantilism.