feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)

Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

examples/infospace-with-history/output/evaluations/economic_development_geography.md

@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
+---
+entity_slug: economic_development_geography
+evaluator: null
+evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T05:09:57.084640'
+overall_score: 4.6
+scores:
+- name: definition_precision
+  value: 4.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: The definition clearly distinguishes economic development geography as
+    the study of how spatial relationships influence economic patterns, avoiding circularity.
+    It could be slightly more precise about the mechanisms involved, but successfully
+    captures a distinct analytical concept.
+- name: source_grounding
+  value: 5.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: This entity is exceptionally well-grounded in Smith's actual text, as
+    Book I, Chapter 3 explicitly analyzes how geographical features like coastlines,
+    rivers, and canals determine industrial development patterns. The entity directly
+    reflects Smith's core argument in that chapter.
+- name: domain_placement
+  value: 5.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: '"General Theory" is the correct domain placement since this represents
+    Smith''s theoretical framework for understanding spatial economic development
+    rather than a specific policy or operational mechanism. It''s a foundational analytical
+    concept.'
+- name: vsm_relevance
+  value: 4.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: This entity maps well to S4 (intelligence/environmental adaptation) as
+    it concerns how economic systems adapt to and leverage their geographical environment
+    for development. It also has some relevance to S1 as it affects primary operations
+    across regions.
+- name: explanatory_value
+  value: 5.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: This entity provides significant explanatory power by illuminating the
+    structural relationship between geography and economic development patterns. It
+    explains fundamental mechanisms behind regional economic differences and specialization
+    patterns that Smith identifies.
+---
+
+# Evaluation: Economic Development Geography
+
+## definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0
+
+The definition clearly distinguishes economic development geography as the study of how spatial relationships influence economic patterns, avoiding circularity. It could be slightly more precise about the mechanisms involved, but successfully captures a distinct analytical concept.
+
+## source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0
+
+This entity is exceptionally well-grounded in Smith's actual text, as Book I, Chapter 3 explicitly analyzes how geographical features like coastlines, rivers, and canals determine industrial development patterns. The entity directly reflects Smith's core argument in that chapter.
+
+## domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0
+
+"General Theory" is the correct domain placement since this represents Smith's theoretical framework for understanding spatial economic development rather than a specific policy or operational mechanism. It's a foundational analytical concept.
+
+## vsm_relevance — 4.0 / 5.0
+
+This entity maps well to S4 (intelligence/environmental adaptation) as it concerns how economic systems adapt to and leverage their geographical environment for development. It also has some relevance to S1 as it affects primary operations across regions.
+
+## explanatory_value — 5.0 / 5.0
+
+This entity provides significant explanatory power by illuminating the structural relationship between geography and economic development patterns. It explains fundamental mechanisms behind regional economic differences and specialization patterns that Smith identifies.