feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)

Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
2026-02-23 09:36:46 +01:00
parent 81a4c8796a
commit a9ca0adfcf
986 changed files with 63216 additions and 1 deletions

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
---
entity_slug: economic_system_comprehension
evaluator: null
evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T05:13:51.259572'
overall_score: 4.0
scores:
- name: definition_precision
value: 3.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: The definition captures a distinct concept about economic understanding
for governance, but uses somewhat circular language ("understanding...that enables"
and "comprehension...necessary for"). The core idea is clear but could be more
precisely articulated.
- name: source_grounding
value: 4.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: This aligns well with Smith's explicit positioning of political economy
as a science for statesmen and legislators in Book IV. Smith does emphasize the
need for economic understanding among those who govern, making this well-grounded
in the source text.
- name: domain_placement
value: 5.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: '"General Theory" is the appropriate domain placement since this represents
Smith''s meta-theoretical framework about political economy as a discipline. It''s
foundational to economic theory rather than belonging to a specific economic mechanism
or policy area.'
- name: vsm_relevance
value: 4.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: This maps naturally to S4 (intelligence/environmental adaptation) and
S5 (identity/policy) systems, as it concerns the cognitive capabilities needed
for strategic economic planning and policy formulation. It represents the intelligence
function necessary for viable economic governance.
- name: explanatory_value
value: 4.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: This entity illuminates an important structural requirement in Smith's
framework - that effective economic governance depends on theoretical comprehension
rather than mere intuition or tradition. It explains why Smith positions political
economy as a science requiring systematic study.
---
# Evaluation: Economic System Comprehension
## definition_precision — 3.0 / 5.0
The definition captures a distinct concept about economic understanding for governance, but uses somewhat circular language ("understanding...that enables" and "comprehension...necessary for"). The core idea is clear but could be more precisely articulated.
## source_grounding — 4.0 / 5.0
This aligns well with Smith's explicit positioning of political economy as a science for statesmen and legislators in Book IV. Smith does emphasize the need for economic understanding among those who govern, making this well-grounded in the source text.
## domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0
"General Theory" is the appropriate domain placement since this represents Smith's meta-theoretical framework about political economy as a discipline. It's foundational to economic theory rather than belonging to a specific economic mechanism or policy area.
## vsm_relevance — 4.0 / 5.0
This maps naturally to S4 (intelligence/environmental adaptation) and S5 (identity/policy) systems, as it concerns the cognitive capabilities needed for strategic economic planning and policy formulation. It represents the intelligence function necessary for viable economic governance.
## explanatory_value — 4.0 / 5.0
This entity illuminates an important structural requirement in Smith's framework - that effective economic governance depends on theoretical comprehension rather than mere intuition or tradition. It explains why Smith positions political economy as a science requiring systematic study.