feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)
Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics written with per_entity_mean=3.9556. Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS redundancy_ratio 0.0061 (max 0.10) coverage_ratio 0.6190 (min 0.40) coherence_comps 0.0000 (max 3) consistency_cycles 0.0000 (max 0) granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0) per_entity_mean 3.9556 (min 3.5) Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities): definition_precision 3.62 source_grounding 4.36 domain_placement 4.56 vsm_relevance 3.31 explanatory_value 3.94 Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
entity_slug: economic_system_comprehension
|
||||
evaluator: null
|
||||
evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T05:13:51.259572'
|
||||
overall_score: 4.0
|
||||
scores:
|
||||
- name: definition_precision
|
||||
value: 3.0
|
||||
max_value: 5.0
|
||||
rationale: The definition captures a distinct concept about economic understanding
|
||||
for governance, but uses somewhat circular language ("understanding...that enables"
|
||||
and "comprehension...necessary for"). The core idea is clear but could be more
|
||||
precisely articulated.
|
||||
- name: source_grounding
|
||||
value: 4.0
|
||||
max_value: 5.0
|
||||
rationale: This aligns well with Smith's explicit positioning of political economy
|
||||
as a science for statesmen and legislators in Book IV. Smith does emphasize the
|
||||
need for economic understanding among those who govern, making this well-grounded
|
||||
in the source text.
|
||||
- name: domain_placement
|
||||
value: 5.0
|
||||
max_value: 5.0
|
||||
rationale: '"General Theory" is the appropriate domain placement since this represents
|
||||
Smith''s meta-theoretical framework about political economy as a discipline. It''s
|
||||
foundational to economic theory rather than belonging to a specific economic mechanism
|
||||
or policy area.'
|
||||
- name: vsm_relevance
|
||||
value: 4.0
|
||||
max_value: 5.0
|
||||
rationale: This maps naturally to S4 (intelligence/environmental adaptation) and
|
||||
S5 (identity/policy) systems, as it concerns the cognitive capabilities needed
|
||||
for strategic economic planning and policy formulation. It represents the intelligence
|
||||
function necessary for viable economic governance.
|
||||
- name: explanatory_value
|
||||
value: 4.0
|
||||
max_value: 5.0
|
||||
rationale: This entity illuminates an important structural requirement in Smith's
|
||||
framework - that effective economic governance depends on theoretical comprehension
|
||||
rather than mere intuition or tradition. It explains why Smith positions political
|
||||
economy as a science requiring systematic study.
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Evaluation: Economic System Comprehension
|
||||
|
||||
## definition_precision — 3.0 / 5.0
|
||||
|
||||
The definition captures a distinct concept about economic understanding for governance, but uses somewhat circular language ("understanding...that enables" and "comprehension...necessary for"). The core idea is clear but could be more precisely articulated.
|
||||
|
||||
## source_grounding — 4.0 / 5.0
|
||||
|
||||
This aligns well with Smith's explicit positioning of political economy as a science for statesmen and legislators in Book IV. Smith does emphasize the need for economic understanding among those who govern, making this well-grounded in the source text.
|
||||
|
||||
## domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0
|
||||
|
||||
"General Theory" is the appropriate domain placement since this represents Smith's meta-theoretical framework about political economy as a discipline. It's foundational to economic theory rather than belonging to a specific economic mechanism or policy area.
|
||||
|
||||
## vsm_relevance — 4.0 / 5.0
|
||||
|
||||
This maps naturally to S4 (intelligence/environmental adaptation) and S5 (identity/policy) systems, as it concerns the cognitive capabilities needed for strategic economic planning and policy formulation. It represents the intelligence function necessary for viable economic governance.
|
||||
|
||||
## explanatory_value — 4.0 / 5.0
|
||||
|
||||
This entity illuminates an important structural requirement in Smith's framework - that effective economic governance depends on theoretical comprehension rather than mere intuition or tradition. It explains why Smith positions political economy as a science requiring systematic study.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user