feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)

Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

examples/infospace-with-history/output/evaluations/economic_system_integration.md

@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
+---
+entity_slug: economic_system_integration
+evaluator: null
+evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T05:17:40.809238'
+overall_score: 2.6
+scores:
+- name: definition_precision
+  value: 2.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: The definition is overly broad and vague, using generic terms like "coordination,"
+    "harmonization," and "unified economic objectives" without specifying what constitutes
+    integration or how it differs from general economic coordination. It reads more
+    like a modern management concept than a precise economic principle.
+- name: source_grounding
+  value: 2.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: While Smith does discuss political economy as a science, the entity extrapolates
+    far beyond what Smith actually argues, imposing modern systems thinking language
+    ("integration," "alignment of institutions") that doesn't reflect his 18th-century
+    analytical framework. The connection to "Book IV, Chapter 0" is also questionable
+    as this appears to be a general introduction rather than substantive content.
+- name: domain_placement
+  value: 3.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: '"General Theory" is appropriate given the broad, abstract nature of
+    the concept, though the entity might better fit under "Policy" or "Institutional"
+    domains if it were more precisely defined. The current placement reflects its
+    vague, overarching character.'
+- name: vsm_relevance
+  value: 4.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: This entity maps well to S2 (coordination) and potentially S3 (internal
+    regulation) in the VSM framework, as it explicitly deals with coordination and
+    harmonization of system components. The integration focus aligns naturally with
+    VSM's emphasis on system coherence and coordination mechanisms.
+- name: explanatory_value
+  value: 2.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: The entity provides little explanatory power beyond naming a general
+    phenomenon, offering no insight into specific mechanisms, trade-offs, or structural
+    relationships that Smith identifies. It functions more as a conceptual umbrella
+    than as an analytical tool that illuminates economic processes.
+---
+
+# Evaluation: Economic System Integration
+
+## definition_precision — 2.0 / 5.0
+
+The definition is overly broad and vague, using generic terms like "coordination," "harmonization," and "unified economic objectives" without specifying what constitutes integration or how it differs from general economic coordination. It reads more like a modern management concept than a precise economic principle.
+
+## source_grounding — 2.0 / 5.0
+
+While Smith does discuss political economy as a science, the entity extrapolates far beyond what Smith actually argues, imposing modern systems thinking language ("integration," "alignment of institutions") that doesn't reflect his 18th-century analytical framework. The connection to "Book IV, Chapter 0" is also questionable as this appears to be a general introduction rather than substantive content.
+
+## domain_placement — 3.0 / 5.0
+
+"General Theory" is appropriate given the broad, abstract nature of the concept, though the entity might better fit under "Policy" or "Institutional" domains if it were more precisely defined. The current placement reflects its vague, overarching character.
+
+## vsm_relevance — 4.0 / 5.0
+
+This entity maps well to S2 (coordination) and potentially S3 (internal regulation) in the VSM framework, as it explicitly deals with coordination and harmonization of system components. The integration focus aligns naturally with VSM's emphasis on system coherence and coordination mechanisms.
+
+## explanatory_value — 2.0 / 5.0
+
+The entity provides little explanatory power beyond naming a general phenomenon, offering no insight into specific mechanisms, trade-offs, or structural relationships that Smith identifies. It functions more as a conceptual umbrella than as an analytical tool that illuminates economic processes.