feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)

Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

examples/infospace-with-history/output/evaluations/economic_system_management.md

@@ -0,0 +1,61 @@
+---
+entity_slug: economic_system_management
+evaluator: null
+evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T05:18:32.062456'
+overall_score: 3.0
+scores:
+- name: definition_precision
+  value: 2.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: The definition is overly broad and umbrella-like, encompassing "policies,
+    institutions, and practices" without clear boundaries. It conflates the role of
+    statesmen/legislators with the broader concept of economic system management,
+    making it imprecise and somewhat circular.
+- name: source_grounding
+  value: 3.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: While Smith does discuss political economy as "the science of the statesman
+    or legislator" in Book IV, the entity extrapolates this into a broader concept
+    of "economic system management" that goes beyond what Smith explicitly articulates.
+    The source grounding is partial but not fully supported.
+- name: domain_placement
+  value: 4.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: The "Regulation" domain assignment is appropriate given the focus on
+    oversight, administration, and the role of legislators in economic arrangements.
+    This aligns well with Smith's discussion of government's role in economic affairs.
+- name: vsm_relevance
+  value: 4.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: This entity maps well to VSM System 5 (identity/policy) as it deals with
+    high-level governance and policy direction of economic systems. It also has some
+    relevance to S3 (internal regulation/audit) regarding oversight functions.
+- name: explanatory_value
+  value: 2.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: The entity primarily names a general phenomenon rather than illuminating
+    specific mechanisms or structural relations. It lacks the analytical depth to
+    explain how economic system management actually works or what makes it effective.
+---
+
+# Evaluation: Economic System Management
+
+## definition_precision — 2.0 / 5.0
+
+The definition is overly broad and umbrella-like, encompassing "policies, institutions, and practices" without clear boundaries. It conflates the role of statesmen/legislators with the broader concept of economic system management, making it imprecise and somewhat circular.
+
+## source_grounding — 3.0 / 5.0
+
+While Smith does discuss political economy as "the science of the statesman or legislator" in Book IV, the entity extrapolates this into a broader concept of "economic system management" that goes beyond what Smith explicitly articulates. The source grounding is partial but not fully supported.
+
+## domain_placement — 4.0 / 5.0
+
+The "Regulation" domain assignment is appropriate given the focus on oversight, administration, and the role of legislators in economic arrangements. This aligns well with Smith's discussion of government's role in economic affairs.
+
+## vsm_relevance — 4.0 / 5.0
+
+This entity maps well to VSM System 5 (identity/policy) as it deals with high-level governance and policy direction of economic systems. It also has some relevance to S3 (internal regulation/audit) regarding oversight functions.
+
+## explanatory_value — 2.0 / 5.0
+
+The entity primarily names a general phenomenon rather than illuminating specific mechanisms or structural relations. It lacks the analytical depth to explain how economic system management actually works or what makes it effective.